World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
62
Citations
26525
World Ranking
729
National Ranking
457

John C. Williams publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Williams sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 289 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

John C. Williams D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Williams sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

John C. Williams is affiliated with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in the United States. Their research primarily spans within the broad field of Economics, Econometrics, and Finance, covering a total of 11 publications.

The subfields of study addressed in their work include:

  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Accounting
  • Building and Construction
  • Spectroscopy

The main research topics featured in their publications are:

  • Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
  • Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Economic theories and models
  • Economic Theory and Policy
  • Housing Market and Economics
  • Hygrothermal properties of building materials
  • Aerogels and thermal insulation

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
  • Journal of Monetary Economics
  • American Economic Review
  • Journal of money credit and banking

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by John C. Williams include:

  • What to Expect from the Lower Bound on Interest Rates: Evidence from Derivatives Prices, 2021, American Economic Review
  • A new approach to assess inflation expectations anchoring using strategic surveys, 2022, Journal of Monetary Economics
  • Heat, mass and momentum transport in wet mineral-wool insulation: Experiment and simulation, 2024, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
  • The Curious Case of the Rise in Deflation Expectations, 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Taming Inflation Scares, 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal

Frequent co-authors collaborating with them include:

  • Olivier Armantier
  • Wilbert van der Klaauw
  • Argia M. Sbordone
  • Giorgio Topa
  • Massoud Kaviany

Best Publications

  • Measuring the Natural Rate of Interest

    Thomas Laubach;John C. Williams

  • Measuring the Effect of the Zero Lower Bound on Medium- and Longer-Term Interest Rates

    Eric T. Swanson;John C. Williams

  • Measuring the Social Return to R&D

    Charles I. Jones;John C. Williams

  • Measuring the Natural Rate of Interest: International Trends and Determinants

    Kathryn Holston;Thomas Laubach;John C. Williams

  • Three Lessons for Monetary Policy in a Low Inflation Era

    David L. Reifschneider;John C. Williams

  • Measuring the Natural Rate of Interest

    Unknown

  • A black swan in the money market

    John B. Taylor;John C. Williams

  • Three lessons for monetary policy in a low inflation era

    David L. Reifschneider;John Williams

  • Too Much of a Good Thing? The Economics of Investment in R&D

    Charles I. Jones;John C. Williams

  • The Performance of Forecast-Based Monetary Policy Rules under Model Uncertainty ∗

    Andrew T. Levin;Volker Wieland;John C. Williams

  • Too Much of a Good Thing? The Economics of Investment in R&D

    Unknown

  • Measuring the Natural Rate of Interest: International Trends and Determinants

    Kathryn Holston;Thomas Laubach;John C. Williams

  • Robust Monetary Policy Rules with Unknown Natural Rates

    Athanasios Orphanides;John C. Williams

  • A Black Swan in the Money Market

    John B. Taylor;John C. Williams

  • Measuring the Natural Rate of Interest: International Trends and Determinants

    Unknown

  • Imperfect Knowledge, Inflation Expectations, and Monetary Policy

    Athanasios Orphanides;John C. Williams

  • Three Lessons for Monetary Policy in a Low Inflation Era

    Unknown

  • Robustness of Simple Monetary Policy Rules under Model Uncertainty

    Andrew Levin;Volker Wieland;John C. Williams

  • The decline of activist stabilization policy: natural rate misperceptions, learning, and expectations

    Athanasios Orphanides;John C. Williams

  • Measuring the Effect of the Zero Lower Bound on Medium- and Longer-Term Interest Rates

    Eric T. Swanson;John C. Williams

  • Imperfect Knowledge, Inflation Expectations, and Monetary Policy

    Athanasios Orphanides;John C. Williams

  • Monetary Policy under Uncertainty in Micro-Founded Macroeconometric Models

    Andrew T. Levin;Alexei Onatski;John C. Williams;Noah Williams

  • Measuring the Natural Rate of Interest Redux

    Thomas Laubach;John C. Williams

  • Robust monetary policy with competing reference models

    Andrew T. Levin;John C. Williams

  • Simple and Robust Rules for Monetary Policy

    John B. Taylor;John C. Williams

  • Forecasting Recessions: The Puzzle of the Enduring Power of the Yield Curve

    Glenn D. Rudebusch;John C. Williams

  • Have We Underestimated the Likelihood and Severity of Zero Lower Bound Events

    Hess Chung;Jean-Philippe Laforte;David L. Reifschneider;John C. Williams

  • The evolution of macro models at the Federal Reserve Board

    Flint Brayton;Andrew Levin;Ralph Lyon;John C. Williams

  • Robust Monetary Policy with Imperfect Knowledge

    Athanasios Orphanides;John C. Williams

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Laubach
Thomas Laubach Federal Reserve System
Andrew T. Levin
Andrew T. Levin Dartmouth College
Simon Gilchrist
Simon Gilchrist New York University
John B. Taylor
John B. Taylor Stanford University
Eric T. Swanson
Eric T. Swanson University of California, Irvine
Volker Wieland
Volker Wieland Goethe University Frankfurt
Glenn D. Rudebusch
Glenn D. Rudebusch Brookings Institution
Peter Cramton
Peter Cramton University of Maryland, College Park
David E. M. Sappington
David E. M. Sappington University of Florida

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your study of Economics and Finance, several online degrees offer specialized skills and new career opportunities. For those interested in data-driven decision-making, pursuing an online masters business intelligence program can build competencies in data analysis and strategic planning—qualities highly sought after in modern business.

An accelerated online mba 1 year program allows you to quickly earn your degree and enter the workforce, some without GMAT or GRE requirements. Cost is also a critical factor, and there are best mba programs under 30k that offer affordability without sacrificing quality.

As financial landscapes become more digital, understanding marketing strategies is crucial. Earning an online digital marketing degree with social media focus helps you leverage new media for financial products or services, a skill of growing importance in the industry. These related degrees broaden your expertise and open new career pathways in the evolving world of economics and finance.

Best Scientists Citing John C. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles