World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
31
Citations
4970
World Ranking
3268
National Ranking
1105

John C. Vassberg publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Vassberg sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 101 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

John C. Vassberg D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Vassberg sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Development of a Common Research Model for Applied CFD Validation Studies

    John C. Vassberg;Mark A. Dehaan;S. Melissa Rivers;Richard A. Wahls

  • Data Summary from Second AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Drag Prediction Workshop

    Kelly R. Laflin;Steven M. Klausmeyer;Thomas Zickuhr;John C. Vassberg

  • Summary of the Fourth AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop

    John C. Vassberg;Edward N. Tinoco;Mori Mani;Ben Rider

  • Summary Data from the Sixth AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop: CRM Cases

    Edward N. Tinoco;Olaf P. Brodersen;Stefan Keye;Kelly R. Laflin

  • Abridged Summary of the Third AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Drag Prediction Workshop

    John C. Vassberg;Edward N. Tinoco;Mori Mani;Olaf P. Brodersen

  • Summary of Data from the Fifth Computational Fluid Dynamics Drag Prediction Workshop

    David W. Levy;Kelly R. Laflin;Edward N. Tinoco;John C. Vassberg

  • In Pursuit of Grid Convergence for Two-Dimensional Euler Solutions

    John C. Vassberg;Antony Jameson

  • Summary of Data from the First AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop

    David W. Levy;Tom Zickuhr;John Vassberg;Shreekant Agrawal

  • Summary of the Third AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop

    John C. Vassberg;Edward N. Tinoco;Mori Mani;Olaf P. Brodersen

  • Grid Quality and Resolution Issues from the Drag Prediction Workshop Series

    Dimitri J. Mavriplis;John C. Vassberg;Edward N. Tinoco;Mori Mani

  • Aerodynamic shape optimization techniques based on control theory

    Antony Jameson;Juan Alonso;James Reuther;Luigi Martinelli

  • Summary of Data from the Fifth AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop

    David W. Levy;Kelly R. Laflin;Edward N. Tinoco;John C. Vassberg

  • Computational Fluid Dynamics for Aerodynamic Design: Its Current and Future Impact

    Antony Jameson;John Vassberg

  • Summary of the Fourth AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Drag Prediction Workshop

    John C. Vassberg;Edward N. Tinoco;Mori Mani;Ben Rider

  • Summary of Data from the Second AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop

    K. Laflin;S. Klausmeyer;T. Zickuhr;J. Vassberg

  • Data Summary from the First AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Drag Prediction Workshop

    Unknown

  • Study Based on the AIAA Aerodynamic Design Optimization Discussion Group Test Cases

    Stephen T. LeDoux;John C. Vassberg;David P. Young;Spencer Fugal

  • A Unified Baseline Grid about the Common Research Model Wing/Body for the Fifth AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop (Invited)

    Unknown

  • Summary of Data from the Second AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop (Invited)

    Kelly Laflin;Olaf Brodersen;Mark Rakowitz;John Vassberg

  • Comparative Study of Three-Dimensional Wing Drag Minimization by Different Optimization Techniques

    Boris Epstein;Antony Jameson;Sergey Peigin;Dino Roman

Frequent Co-Authors

Antony Jameson
Antony Jameson Texas A&M University
Dimitri J. Mavriplis
Dimitri J. Mavriplis University of Wyoming
Christopher L. Rumsey
Christopher L. Rumsey Langley Research Center
David W. Zingg
David W. Zingg University of Toronto
Christopher J. Roy
Christopher J. Roy Virginia Tech

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students pursuing Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering often consider complementary online degrees to broaden their skill sets. For those interested in healthcare communication, accelerated SLP programs provide a faster route to becoming licensed speech-language pathologists, offering a valuable bridge between engineering and clinical applications.

Alternatively, some graduates explore career paths in federal agencies, where analytical and problem-solving skills are critical. For example, understanding the requirements and job outlook can be beneficial if aiming to become an FBI criminal profiler; detailed insights are available through FBI criminal profiler salary guidance.

Engineering students interested in human behavior and support might consider psychology-oriented tracks. Exploring the different therapy degrees helps identify programs suited for diverse counseling fields, aligning well with interdisciplinary approaches.

For those wanting a more accessible start, reviewing the easiest counseling degree programs can be a practical step toward entering counseling professions, which complement engineering skills through enhanced communication and interpersonal abilities.

Best Scientists Citing John C. Vassberg

Recently Published Articles