World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
4851
World Ranking
10389
National Ranking
1286

Jing Bi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jing Bi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 195 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jing Bi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jing Bi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Energy-Optimized Partial Computation Offloading in Mobile-Edge Computing With Genetic Simulated-Annealing-Based Particle Swarm Optimization

    Jing Bi;Haitao Yuan;Shuaifei Duanmu;MengChu Zhou

  • A Hybrid Prediction Method for Realistic Network Traffic With Temporal Convolutional Network and LSTM

    Jing Bi;Xiang Zhang;Haitao Yuan;Jia Zhang

  • Dynamic Provisioning Modeling for Virtualized Multi-tier Applications in Cloud Data Center

    Unknown

  • TTSA: An Effective Scheduling Approach for Delay Bounded Tasks in Hybrid Clouds

    Haitao Yuan;Jing Bi;Wei Tan;MengChu Zhou

  • Exploiting ensemble learning for automatic cataract detection and grading

    Ji-Jiang Yang;Jianqiang Li;Ruifang Shen;Yang Zeng

  • Artificial neural networks for water quality soft-sensing in wastewater treatment: a review

    Gongming Wang;Qing Shan Jia;Meng Chu Zhou;Jing Bi

  • Integrated deep learning method for workload and resource prediction in cloud systems

    Jing Bi;Shuang Li;Haitao Yuan;Meng Chu Zhou

  • Application-Aware Dynamic Fine-Grained Resource Provisioning in a Virtualized Cloud Data Center

    Jing Bi;Haitao Yuan;Wei Tan;MengChu Zhou

  • TL-GDBN: Growing Deep Belief Network With Transfer Learning

    GongMing Wang;JunFei Qiao;Jing Bi;WenJing Li

  • Deep Learning-Based Model Predictive Control for Continuous Stirred-Tank Reactor System

    Gongming Wang;Qing-Shan Jia;Junfei Qiao;Jing Bi

  • Temporal Task Scheduling With Constrained Service Delay for Profit Maximization in Hybrid Clouds

    Haitao Yuan;Jing Bi;Wei Tan;Bo Hu Li

  • Biobjective Task Scheduling for Distributed Green Data Centers

    Haitao Yuan;Jing Bi;MengChu Zhou;Qing Liu

  • Large-scale water quality prediction with integrated deep neural network

    Jing Bi;Yongze Lin;Quanxi Dong;Haitao Yuan

  • Self-adaptive Bat Algorithm With Genetic Operations

    Unknown

  • Temporal Prediction of Multiapplication Consolidated Workloads in Distributed Clouds

    Jing Bi;Haitao Yuan;Mengchu Zhou

  • Spatial Task Scheduling for Cost Minimization in Distributed Green Cloud Data Centers

    Haitao Yuan;Jing Bi;MengChu Zhou

  • Revenue and Energy Cost-Optimized Biobjective Task Scheduling for Green Cloud Data Centers

    Haitao Yuan;Heng Liu;Jing Bi;MengChu Zhou

  • SGW-SCN: An integrated machine learning approach for workload forecasting in geo-distributed cloud data centers

    Unknown

  • Multiqueue Scheduling of Heterogeneous Tasks With Bounded Response Time in Hybrid Green IaaS Clouds

    Haitao Yuan;Jing Bi;MengChu Zhou

  • Time-Aware Multi-Application Task Scheduling With Guaranteed Delay Constraints in Green Data Center

    Haitao Yuan;Jing Bi;MengChu Zhou;Ahmed Chiheb Ammari

Frequent Co-Authors

MengChu Zhou
MengChu Zhou New Jersey Institute of Technology
Wei Tan
Wei Tan Citadel LLC
Jianqiang Li
Jianqiang Li Beijing University of Technology
Junfei Qiao
Junfei Qiao Beijing University of Technology
Abdullah Abusorrah
Abdullah Abusorrah King Abdulaziz University
Qing-Shan Jia
Qing-Shan Jia Tsinghua University
Yusuf Al-Turki
Yusuf Al-Turki King Abdulaziz University
Qing Wang
Qing Wang Pennsylvania State University
Hong Jiang
Hong Jiang The University of Texas at Arlington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jing Bi