World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 38 5961 5540 2842 2596 95 6007

Jenna L. McCauley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jenna L. McCauley between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jenna L. McCauley published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2014. 13 of the 118 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2014. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 3 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 5 publications
2007 2025

118 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jenna L. McCauley: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 2
2009 4
2010 8
2011 10
2012 10
2013 7
2014 12
2015 10
2016 7
2017 3
2018 1
2019 3
2020 6
2021 12
2022 5
2023 4
2024 8
2025 5
Total 118
Download as CSV

Jenna L. McCauley publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jenna L. McCauley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 94–103 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 95 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390 95
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jenna L. McCauley D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jenna L. McCauley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278 38
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Jenna L. McCauley is affiliated with the Medical University of South Carolina in the United States, with a research focus primarily in the field of Medicine. Their scholarly work spans a variety of subfields including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Epidemiology, and General Health Professions.

The main topics in Jenna L. McCauley's research include:

  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Poisoning and overdose treatments

Their recent publications reflect these research themes, with selected papers including:

  • "Retention in Treatment after Emergency Department-Initiated Buprenorphine" (2021), Journal of Emergency Medicine
  • "Risk factors and trajectories of opioid use following total knee replacement" (2022), Knee Surgery and Related Research
  • "Increased availability of telehealth mental health and substance abuse treatment for peripartum and postpartum women: A unique opportunity to increase telehealth treatment" (2021), Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • "High-Risk Opioid Prescribing Trends: Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Data From 2010 to 2018" (2020), Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
  • "Substance Use Prevention Programming for Adolescents and Young Adults: A Mixed-Method Examination of Substance Use Perceptions and Use of Prevention Services" (2020), Substance Use & Misuse

Jenna L. McCauley has published frequently in the following venues:

  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • American Journal of Psychiatry
  • Journal of the American Pharmacists Association
  • JAMIA Open
  • Addiction Science & Clinical Practice

Collaborations have been a significant part of their academic work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Sarah Ball
  • Ralph Ward
  • Kathleen T. Brady
  • Patrick D. Mauldin
  • Kelly S. Barth

Best Publications

  • Drug-facilitated, Incapacitated, and Forcible Rape: A National Study

    Dean Kilpatrick;Heidi Resnick;Kenneth Ruggiero;Lauren Conoscenti

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Co-Occurring Substance Use Disorders: Advances in Assessment and Treatment.

    Jenna L. McCauley;Therese Killeen;Daniel F. Gros;Kathleen T. Brady

  • Is Reporting of Rape on the Rise? A Comparison of Women With Reported Versus Unreported Rape Experiences in the National Women’s Study-Replication

    Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Heidi S. Resnick;Jenna L. McCauley;Ananda B. Amstadter

  • Prescription Opioid Misuse, Abuse, and Treatment in the United States: An Update

    Kathleen T. Brady;Jenna L. McCauley;Sudie E. Back

  • Reporting Rape in a National Sample of College Women

    Kate B. Wolitzky-Taylor;Heidi S. Resnick;Ananda B. Amstadter;Jenna L. McCauley

  • Prevalence and risk of psychiatric disorders as a function of variant rape histories: results from a national survey of women

    Heidi M. Zinzow;Heidi S. Resnick;Jenna L. McCauley;Ananda B. Amstadter

  • National Prevalence of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Sexually Revictimized Adolescent, College, and Adult Household-Residing Women

    Kate Walsh;Carla Kmett Danielson;Jenna L. McCauley;Benjamin E. Saunders

  • The role of rape tactics in risk for posttraumatic stress disorder and major depression: results from a national sample of college women

    Heidi M. Zinzow;Heidi S. Resnick;Jenna L. McCauley;Ananda B. Amstadter

  • Prevalence and correlates of service utilization and help seeking in a national college sample of female rape victims

    Ananda B. Amstadter;Heidi M. Zinzow;Jenna L. McCauley;Martha Strachan

  • Self-rated Health in Relation to Rape and Mental Health Disorders in a National Sample of College Women

    Heidi M. Zinzow;Ananda B. Amstadter;Jenna L. McCauley;Kenneth J. Ruggiero

  • Prevalence and predictors of PTSD and depression among adolescent victims of the Spring 2011 tornado outbreak

    Zachary W. Adams;Jennifer A. Sumner;Carla Kmett Danielson;Jenna L. McCauley

  • Pilot of a brief, web-based educational intervention targeting safe storage and disposal of prescription opioids.

    Jenna L. McCauley;Sudie E. Back;Sudie E. Back;Kathleen T. Brady;Kathleen T. Brady

  • Disaster Impact Across Cultural Groups: Comparison of Whites, African Americans, and Latinos

    Tatiana M. Davidson;Matthew Price;Jenna L. McCauley;Kenneth J. Ruggiero

  • The role of traumatic event history in non-medical use of prescription drugs among a nationally representative sample of US adolescents

    Jenna L. McCauley;Carla Kmett Danielson;Ananda B. Amstadter;Kenneth J. Ruggiero;Kenneth J. Ruggiero

  • Forcible, drug-facilitated, and incapacitated rape in relation to substance use problems: Results from a national sample of college women ☆

    Jenna McCauley;Kenneth J. Ruggiero;Heidi S. Resnick;Lauren M. Conoscenti

  • A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Pilot Trial of N -Acetylcysteine in Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Substance Use Disorders

    Sudie E. Back;Sudie E. Back;Jenna L. McCauley;Kristina J. Korte;Kristina J. Korte;Daniel F. Gros;Daniel F. Gros

  • Drug- or Alcohol-Facilitated, Incapacitated, and Forcible Rape in Relationship to Mental Health Among a National Sample of Women

    Heidi M. Zinzow;Heidi S. Resnick;Ananda B. Amstadter;Jenna L. McCauley

  • Do incident and perpetrator characteristics of elder mistreatment differ by gender of the victim? Results from the National Elder Mistreatment Study.

    Ananda B. Amstadter;Josh M. Cisler;Jenna L. McCauley;Melba A. Hernández

  • Binge Drinking and Rape: A Prospective Examination of College Women With a History of Previous Sexual Victimization

    Jenna L. McCauley;Karen S. Calhoun;Christine A. Gidycz

  • College Women’s Experiences With Rape Disclosure: A National Study

    Lisa A. Paul;Kate Walsh;Jenna L. McCauley;Kenneth J. Ruggiero

  • Document Title: Drug-facilitated, Incapacitated, and Forcible Rape: A National Study

    Dean G. Kilpatrick;Heidi S. Resnick;Kenneth J. Ruggiero;Lauren M. Conoscenti

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth J. Ruggiero
Kenneth J. Ruggiero Medical University of South Carolina
Heidi S. Resnick
Heidi S. Resnick Medical University of South Carolina
Dean G. Kilpatrick
Dean G. Kilpatrick Medical University of South Carolina
Ananda B. Amstadter
Ananda B. Amstadter Virginia Commonwealth University
Carla Kmett Danielson
Carla Kmett Danielson Medical University of South Carolina
Kathleen T. Brady
Kathleen T. Brady Medical University of South Carolina
Daniel F. Gros
Daniel F. Gros Medical University of South Carolina
Heidi M. Zinzow
Heidi M. Zinzow Clemson University
Matthew Price
Matthew Price University of Vermont
Benjamin E. Saunders
Benjamin E. Saunders Medical University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens pathways to diverse careers in education, counseling, policy, and research. Today, many students are choosing to study online for added flexibility and affordability. With options such as cheap psychology masters programs, gaining a quality education without excessive debt is more achievable than ever.

For those looking to fast-track their professional goals, fastest online edd programs and other accelerated online degrees allow you to earn recognized qualifications in less time. These options are ideal if you want to quickly enter or advance in fields like education administration, counseling, or public service.

Online learning is not just about speed and savings. Reputable institutions now offer a wide range of masters programs online, giving you access to high-quality training on your schedule. Whether you’re beginning a new career or seeking advancement, these flexible degree paths in the Social Sciences and Humanities can set you on the right path to success.

Best Scientists Citing Jenna L. McCauley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles