World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 37 8839 8163 3740 3386 95 4878

Janet L. Stringer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Janet L. Stringer between 1967 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Janet L. Stringer published across 50 years, from 1967 to 2016, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 1989. 2 of the 107 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 1989. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 1 publication 1969: 2 publications 1970: 3 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 3 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 5 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication
1967 2016

107 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Janet L. Stringer: publications per year, 1967 to 2016
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 1
1969 2
1970 3
1971 0
1972 1
1973 3
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 2
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 2
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 6
1989 8
1990 6
1991 3
1992 4
1993 3
1994 6
1995 1
1996 5
1997 4
1998 4
1999 3
2000 7
2001 4
2002 3
2003 2
2004 4
2005 2
2006 2
2007 2
2008 6
2009 2
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 1
2016 1
Total 107
Download as CSV

Janet L. Stringer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet L. Stringer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 88–97 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 95 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452 95
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Janet L. Stringer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet L. Stringer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435 37
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Janet L. Stringer is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States. Their work appears to center within an academic and medical research context, as indicated by the primary institutional association.

There is no publicly available record of recent papers authored by Janet L. Stringer, nor is there information on frequent co-authors or common publication venues associated with their research. Similarly, no documented book publications or awards have been recorded in available sources.

The data does not specify particular main fields or subfields of study linked to their research, nor does it highlight specific topics of work or specialization areas.

Given the absence of detailed publication or research topic data, the profile of Janet L. Stringer is primarily defined by their current affiliation within an established academic medical institution. This situates them within a framework that potentially encompasses a broad array of medical and biomedical research domains.

Best Publications

  • Functional anatomy of hippocampal seizures.

    Eric W. Lothman;Edward H. Bertram;Janet L. Stringer

  • Recurrent spontaneous hippocampal seizures in the rat as a chronic sequela to limbic status epilepticus.

    Eric W. Lothman;Edward H. Bertram;Jaideep Kapur;Janet L. Stringer

  • Combination of hypothyroidism and stress abolishes early LTP in the CA1 but not dentate gyrus of hippocampus of adult rats.

    Nashaat Z Gerges;Janet L Stringer;Karim A Alkadhi

  • Evidence that repetitive seizures in the hippocampus cause a lasting reduction of GABAergic inhibition.

    J. Kapur;J. L. Stringer;E. W. Lothman

  • Activity-Dependent Intracellular Acidification Correlates with the Duration of Seizure Activity

    Unknown

  • Elimination of long-term potentiation in the hippocampus by phencyclidine and ketamine.

    Janet L. Stringer;Patrice G. Guyenet

  • Induction of paroxysmal discharges in the dentate gyrus: frequency dependence and relationship to afterdischarge production.

    J. L. Stringer;J. M. Williamson;E. W. Lothman

  • Reverberatory seizure discharges in hippocampal-parahippocampal circuits.

    Janet L. Stringer;Eric W. Lothman

  • Sodium pump activity, not glial spatial buffering, clears potassium after epileptiform activity induced in the dentate gyrus.

    Unknown

  • Blockade of long-term potentiation by phencyclidine and σ opiates in the hippocampus in vivo and in vitro

    Janet L. Stringer;L. John Greenfield;John T. Hackett;Patrice G. Guyenet

  • Effect of Volatile Anesthetics on Synaptic Transmission in the Rat Hippocampus

    Robert A. Pearce;Janet L. Stringer;Eric W. Lothman

  • Extracellular pH responses in CA1 and the dentate gyrus during electrical stimulation, seizure discharges, and spreading depression.

    Unknown

  • Maximal dentate gyrus activation: characteristics and alterations after repeated seizures.

    Unknown

  • Astrocytes contribute to regulation of extracellular calcium and potassium in the rat cerebral cortex during spreading depression

    Unknown

  • Repeated seizures increase GFAP and vimentin in the hippocampus

    Unknown

  • Bilateral maximal dentate activation is critical for the appearance of an afterdischarge in the dentate gyrus.

    J.L. Stringer;E.W. Lothman

  • Energy failure in astrocytes increases the vulnerability of neurons to spreading depression

    Unknown

  • Repetitive seizures cause an increase in paired-pulse inhibition in the dentate gyrus.

    Janet L. Stringer;Eric W. Lothman

  • Effect of volatile anesthetics on synaptic transmission in the rat hippocampus.

    Unknown

  • The stimulation of the mitochondrial uncoupler-dependent ATPase in isolated hepatocytes by catecholamines and glucagon and its relationship to gluconeogenesis.

    Michael A. Titheradge;Janet L. Stringer;Robert C. Haynes

  • Maximal dentate activation: a tool to screen compounds for activity against limbic seizures

    Janet L. Stringer;Eric W. Lothman

  • In vitro effects of extracellular calcium concentrations on hippocampal pyramidal cell responses.

    Janet L. Stringer;Eric W. Lothman

  • Epileptiform discharges induced by altering extracellular potassium and calcium in the rat hippocampal slice

    Janet L. Stringer;Eric W. Lothman

  • MAXIMAL DENTATE ACTIVATION IS PRODUCED BY AMYGDALA STIMULATION IN UNANESTHETIZED RATS

    Janet L. Stringer;John M. Williamson;Eric W. Lothman

  • Effect of phencyclidines on hippocampal pyramidal cells.

    Janet L. Stringer;Patrice G. Guyenet

  • Pharmacological evidence indicating a role of GABAergic systems in termination of limbic seizures

    Janet L. Stringer;Eric W. Lothman

  • Spreading depression and reverberatory seizures induce the upregulation of mRNA for glial fibrillary acidic protein.

    Daniel J. Bonthius;Janet L. Stringer;Eric W. Lothman;Oswald Steward

  • Hippocampal slices from kindled rats show an increased sensitivity for induction of epileptiform activity by changes in extracellular ion concentrations.

    Janet L. Stringer;Eric W. Lothman

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric W. Lothman
Eric W. Lothman University of Virginia
Patrice G. Guyenet
Patrice G. Guyenet University of Virginia
Edward H. Bertram
Edward H. Bertram University of Virginia
Jaideep Kapur
Jaideep Kapur University of Virginia
James P. Bennett
James P. Bennett Virginia Commonwealth University
Robert A. Pearce
Robert A. Pearce University of Wisconsin–Madison
Oswald Steward
Oswald Steward University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA can set you on a path to a rewarding and high-paying career. Many students are interested in finding college majors that make the most money, and neuroscience often ranks highly because of its links to healthcare, technology, and research fields.

If flexibility and affordability matter to you, exploring online colleges that accept financial aid is a smart move. These programs allow you to balance studies with other responsibilities, while potentially reducing debt.

Enhancing your skill set with certificates online can boost your employment prospects or help you pivot into specialized neuroscience fields. Online certifications in areas like data analysis, cognitive science, or health informatics are especially valuable.

For students seeking an efficient route, you can also consider the easiest online bachelor degree options. These degrees may provide a quicker, more accessible pathway towards careers related to neuroscience, such as psychology or biology.

Best Scientists Citing Janet L. Stringer

Recently Published Articles