World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
51
Citations
9199
World Ranking
17190
National Ranking
1352

James O. McInerney publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James O. McInerney sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 144 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

James O. McInerney D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James O. McInerney sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

James O. McInerney is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with specific contributions across several subfields including Molecular Biology, Genetics, Ecology, Plant Science, and Mechanical Engineering.

The main topics James O. McInerney has worked on include:

  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering

The scientist has published extensively, with key recent papers including:

  • "Horizontal Gene Transfer as a Source of Conflict and Cooperation in Prokaryotes" (2020, Frontiers in Microbiology)
  • "Coinfinder: detecting significant associations and dissociations in pangenomes" (2020, Microbial Genomics)
  • "Mechanisms That Shape Microbial Pangenomes" (2021, Trends in Microbiology)
  • "Evidence for Selection in the Abundant Accessory Gene Content of a Prokaryote Pangenome" (2021, Molecular Biology and Evolution)
  • "Contingency, repeatability, and predictability in the evolution of a prokaryotic pangenome" (2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)

James O. McInerney frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Microbial Genomics
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution
  • Frontiers in Microbiology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with James O. McInerney include:

  • Rebecca J Hall
  • Fiona Whelan
  • Nathan Kallus
  • Elizabeth Cummins
  • Alan McNally

Their scholarly work emphasizes the dynamics and mechanisms of microbial pangenomes, horizontal gene transfer, and genetic selection within prokaryotic populations. Their publications address evolutionary concepts and genetic interactions influencing microbial communities and their genetic content.

Best Publications

  • New approaches for unravelling reassortment pathways

    Victoria Svinti;Victoria Svinti;James A Cotton;James A Cotton;James O McInerney

  • Population genomics reveal recent speciation and rapid evolutionary adaptation in polar bears.

    Shiping Liu;Eline D. Lorenzen;Matteo Fumagalli;Bo Li

  • Why prokaryotes have pangenomes

    James O. McInerney;Alan McNally;Mary J. O'Connell

  • Endosymbiotic origin and differential loss of eukaryotic genes

    Chuan Ku;Shijulal Nelson-Sathi;Mayo Roettger;Filipa L. Sousa

  • Replicational and transcriptional selection on codon usage in Borrelia burgdorferi

    James O. McInerney

  • GCUA: general codon usage analysis.

    James O. McInerney

  • Origins of major archaeal clades correspond to gene acquisitions from bacteria

    Shijulal Nelson-Sathi;Filipa L. Sousa;Mayo Roettger;Nabor Lozada-Chávez

  • Acquisition of 1,000 eubacterial genes physiologically transformed a methanogen at the origin of Haloarchaea

    Shijulal Nelson-Sathi;Tal Dagan;Giddy Landan;Arnold Janssen

  • Supertrees Disentangle the Chimerical Origin of Eukaryotic Genomes

    Davide Pisani;James A. Cotton;James O. McInerney

  • Clann: investigating phylogenetic information through supertree analyses

    C. J. Creevey;J. O. Mcinerney

  • Metazoan opsin evolution reveals a simple route to animal vision

    Roberto Feuda;Sinead C. Hamilton;James O. McInerney;Davide Pisani

  • Networks: expanding evolutionary thinking

    Eric Bapteste;Leo van Iersel;Axel Janke;Scot Kelchner

  • Combined analysis of variation in core, accessory and regulatory genome regions provides a super-resolution view into the evolution of bacterial populations

    Alan McNally;Yaara Oren;Darren Kelly;Ben Pascoe

  • The Opisthokonta and the Ecdysozoa May Not Be Clades: Stronger Support for the Grouping of Plant and Animal than for Animal and Fungi and Stronger Support for the Coelomata than Ecdysozoa

    Gayle K. Philip;Christopher J. Creevey;James O. McInerney

  • TOPD/FMTS

    Pere Puigbò;Santiago Garcia-Vallvé;James O. McInerney

  • Genome Phylogenies Indicate a Meaningful α-Proteobacterial Phylogeny and Support a Grouping of the Mitochondria with the Rickettsiales

    David A. Fitzpatrick;Christopher J. Creevey;James O. McInerney

  • Of clades and clans: terms for phylogenetic relationships in unrooted trees.

    Mark Wilkinson;James O. McInerney;Robert P. Hirt;Peter G. Foster

  • The hybrid nature of the Eukaryota and a consilient view of life on Earth.

    James O. McInerney;Mary J. O'Connell;Davide Pisani

  • A method for inferring the rate of evolution of homologous characters that can potentially improve phylogenetic inference, resolve deep divergence and correct systematic biases.

    Carla A. Cummins;James O. McInerney

  • Does a tree-like phylogeny only exist at the tips in the prokaryotes?

    Christopher J. Creevey;David A. Fitzpatrick;Gayle K. Philip;Rhoda J. Kinsella

Frequent Co-Authors

Davide Pisani
Davide Pisani University of Bristol
Eric Bapteste
Eric Bapteste Sorbonne University
William Martin
William Martin Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Thomas J. Naughton
Thomas J. Naughton National University of Ireland, Maynooth
James Cotton
James Cotton University of Glasgow
Alan McNally
Alan McNally University of Birmingham
Peter G. Foster
Peter G. Foster Natural History Museum
Simon R. Harris
Simon R. Harris Wellcome Sanger Institute
Tal Dagan
Tal Dagan Kiel University
Jukka Corander
Jukka Corander University of Oslo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing James O. McInerney

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles