World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 46 4269 3925 1651 1467 170 7085

Jamal Rostami publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jamal Rostami between 1994 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jamal Rostami published across 33 years, from 1994 to 2026, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2024. 19 of the 223 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2024. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 7 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 3 publications
1994 2026

223 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jamal Rostami: publications per year, 1994 to 2026
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 0
2005 1
2006 0
2007 1
2008 7
2009 7
2010 6
2011 6
2012 8
2013 8
2014 12
2015 10
2016 13
2017 12
2018 19
2019 18
2020 15
2021 17
2022 8
2023 11
2024 21
2025 16
2026 3
Total 223
Download as CSV

Jamal Rostami publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamal Rostami sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 168–177 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 170 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490 170
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Jamal Rostami D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamal Rostami sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212 46
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jamal Rostami is affiliated with the Colorado School of Mines in the United States. Their primary research domain is in the broad field of Engineering, with a significant focus on Civil and Structural Engineering, Ocean Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality.

The scientist's work concentrates heavily on key topics including Tunneling and Rock Mechanics, Drilling and Well Engineering, Rock Mechanics and Modeling, Advanced machining processes and optimization, Advanced materials and composites, Mineral Processing and Grinding, and Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis.

Jamal Rostami has authored numerous research articles published across various reputable journals. Recent publications include:

  • Prediction of flyrock distance induced by mine blasting using a novel Harris Hawks optimization-based multi-layer perceptron neural network, 2021, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
  • Tracking of disc cutter wear in TBM tunneling: a case study of Kerman water conveyance tunnel, 2020, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
  • Evaluation of TBM Cutter Wear in Naghadeh Water Conveyance Tunnel and Developing a New Prediction Model, 2021, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
  • Predicting TBM performance in soft sedimentary rocks, case study of Zagros mountains water tunnel projects, 2020, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
  • Introducing an empirical model for prediction of disc cutter life for TBM application in jointed rocks: case study, Kerman water conveyance tunnel, 2021, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment

The primary publication venues where Rostami's research appears frequently include:

  • Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
  • Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
  • Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Rostami are:

  • Jafar Hassanpour
  • Anuradha Khetwal
  • Priscilla P. Nelson
  • Christopher B. Dreyer
  • Morteza Karami

Overall, Rostami's body of work reflects a multidisciplinary engagement with engineering challenges related to rock mechanics, tunneling technology, and material performance. Their collaborations and publication record indicate a focus on advancing predictive modeling techniques and empirical evaluations in the domain of underground construction and mining engineering.

Best Publications

  • Disc cutting tests in Colorado Red Granite: Implications for TBM performance prediction

    Richard E. Gertsch;Leslie S. Gertsch;Jamal Rostami

  • A new hard rock TBM performance prediction model for project planning

    Jafar Hassanpour;Jamal Rostami;Jian Zhao

  • Performance prediction of hard rock TBM using Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system

    Jafar Khademi Hamidi;Kourosh Shahriar;Bahram Rezai;Jamal Rostami

  • TBM Performance Analysis in Pyroclastic Rocks: A Case History of Karaj Water Conveyance Tunnel

    J. Hassanpour;J. Rostami;Mashalah Khamehchiyan;A. Bruland

  • Performance prediction of hard rock Tunnel Boring Machines (TBMs) in difficult ground

    Jamal Rostami

  • Study of various models for estimation of penetration rate of hard rock TBMs

    Ebrahim Farrokh;Jamal Rostami;Chris Laughton

  • Study of pressure distribution within the crushed zone in the contact area between rock and disc cutters

    Jamal Rostami

  • Application of non-linear regression analysis and artificial intelligence algorithms for performance prediction of hard rock TBMs

    Alireza Salimi;Jamal Rostami;Christian Moormann;Andrea Delisio

  • Developing new equations for TBM performance prediction in carbonate-argillaceous rocks: a case history of Nowsood water conveyance tunnel

    J. Hassanpour;J. Rostami;M. Khamehchiyan;A. Bruland

  • Hard Rock TBM Cutterhead Modeling for Design and Performance Prediction

    Unknown

  • Performance prediction: a key issue in mechanical hard rock mining

    J. Rostami;L. Ozdemir;D. M. Neil

  • Failure Characteristics of Granite Influenced by Sample Height-to-Width Ratios and Intermediate Principal Stress Under True-Triaxial Unloading Conditions

    Xibing Li;Fan Feng;Fan Feng;Diyuan Li;Kun Du

  • Introduction of an empirical TBM cutter wear prediction model for pyroclastic and mafic igneous rocks; a case history of Karaj water conveyance tunnel, Iran

    Jafar Hassanpour;Jamal Rostami;S. Tarigh Azali;J. Zhao;J. Zhao

  • Effect of adverse geological condition on TBM operation in Ghomroud tunnel conveyance project

    Ebrahim Farrokh;Jamal Rostami

  • Numerical Investigation of Hard Rock Strength and Fracturing under Polyaxial Compression Based on Mogi-Coulomb Failure Criterion

    Fan Feng;Xibing Li;Jamal Rostami;Dingxiao Peng

  • 3D finite difference model for simulation of double shield TBM tunneling in squeezing grounds

    Rohola Hasanpour;Jamal Rostami;Bahtiyar Ünver

  • Application of rock mass classification systems for performance estimation of rock TBMs using regression tree and artificial intelligence algorithms

    Unknown

  • Study of Dominant Factors Affecting Cerchar Abrasivity Index

    Jamal Rostami;Amireza Ghasemi;Ehsan Alavi Gharahbagh;Cihan Dogruoz

  • Development of soil abrasivity testing for soft ground tunneling using shield machines

    Jamal Rostami;Ehsan Alavi Gharahbagh;Angelica M. Palomino;Mohsen Mosleh

  • Modeling hard rock failure induced by structural planes around deep circular tunnels

    Fan Feng;Fan Feng;Xibing Li;Jamal Rostami;Diyuan Li

  • Prediction of TBM jamming risk in squeezing grounds using Bayesian and artificial neural networks

    Rohola Hasanpour;Jamal Rostami;Jürgen Schmitt;Yilmaz Ozcelik

  • New soil abrasion testing method for soft ground tunneling applications

    E. Alavi Gharahbagh;J. Rostami;A.M. Palomino

  • Experimental study of the effect of conditioning on abrasive wear and torque requirement of full face tunneling machines

    Ehsan Alavi Gharahbagh;Jamal Rostami;Kaveh Talebi

Frequent Co-Authors

Jian Zhao
Jian Zhao Monash University
Mostafa Sharifzadeh
Mostafa Sharifzadeh Curtin University
Xibing Li
Xibing Li Central South University
Diyuan Li
Diyuan Li Central South University
Edy Tonnizam Mohamad
Edy Tonnizam Mohamad University of Technology Malaysia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an Earth Science degree online opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career paths. Students interested in creative fields might explore an online photography degree, which often complements environmental research through visual documentation and spatial analysis.

Veterans seeking educational advancement can benefit from specialized programs such as an online photography bachelor degree for veterans. These options provide flexible learning tailored to military experience, making transitions smoother.

For those aiming to enhance language skills alongside Earth Science, combining a Spanish degree offers unique advantages. Affordable options like the cheapest online spanish degree programs help students maximize their investment while boosting employability in global markets.

Additionally, veterans can find supportive environments through the best military friendly online spanish degrees, integrating language acquisition with career-focused training. These degrees expand opportunities in fields such as environmental policy, education, and international development.

Best Scientists Citing Jamal Rostami

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles