World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
31
Citations
3915
World Ranking
2830
National Ranking
1094

Jack C. Hayya publications per year

1961: 1 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 1 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 1 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publications 1997: 1 publications 1998: 1 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 2 publications
1961 2013

87 publications in total across all disciplines

Jack C. Hayya publication distribution in Business and Management in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Jack C. Hayya sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 81 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Jack C. Hayya D-index placement in Business and Management in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Jack C. Hayya sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute

Best Publications

  • The Bullwhip Effect—Impact of Stochastic Lead Time, Information Quality, and Information Sharing: A Simulation Study

    Dean C. Chatfield;Jeon G. Kim;Terry P. Harrison;Jack C. Hayya

  • Sole Versus Dual Sourcing in Stochastic Lead-Time s, Q Inventory Models

    Ranga V. Ramasesh;J. Keith Ord;Jack C. Hayya;Andrew Pan

  • A Note on the Ratio of Two Normally Distributed Variables

    Jack Hayya;Donald Armstrong;Nicolas Gressis

  • Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a supply chain with stochastic lead time

    Jeon G. Kim;Dean C. Chatfield;Terry P. Harrison;Jack C. Hayya

  • A fuzzy clustering approach to manufacturing cell formation

    Chao Hsien Chu;Jack C. Hayya

  • Priority dispatching with operation due dates in a job shop

    John J. Kanet;Jack C. Hayya

  • Just-In-Time purchasing: Single or multiple sourcing?

    Jae-Dong Hong;Jack C. Hayya

  • The effect of lead-time variability: The case of independent demand

    Uttarayan Bagchi;Jack C. Hayya;Chao Hsien Chu

  • SISCO: an object-oriented supply chain simulation system

    Dean C. Chatfield;Terry P. Harrison;Jack C. Hayya

  • Setup Reduction in the Economic Production Quantity Model

    Seung Lae Kim;Jack C. Hayya;Jae-Dong Hong

  • A multi-formalism architecture for agent-based, order-centric supply chain simulation

    Dean C. Chatfield;Jack C. Hayya;Terry P. Harrison

  • Joint investment in quality improvement and setup reduction

    Jae-Dong Hong;Jack C. Hayya

  • MODELING DEMAND DURING LEAD TIME

    Uttarayan Bagchi;Jack C. Hayya;J. Keith Ord

  • A PERIODIC-REVIEW INVENTORY SYSTEM WITH SUPPLY INTERRUPTIONS

    Zhaolin Li;Susan H. Xu;Jack Hayya

  • The impact of stochastic lead time reduction on inventory cost under order crossover

    Jack C. Hayya;Terry Paul Harrison;X. James He

  • On static stochastic order crossover

    Jack C. Hayya;Uttarayan Bagchi;Jeon G. Kim;Daewon Sun

  • Process quality improvement and setup reduction in dynamic lot-sizing

    Jae-Dong Hong;S. H. Xu;J. C. Hayya

  • Multiple sourcing: The determination of lead times

    Andrew C. Pan;Ranga V. Ramasesh;Jack C. Hayya;J. Keith Ord

  • An Inventory Model with Order Crossover

    Xin X. He;Susan H. Xu;J. Keith Ord;Jack C. Hayya

  • Note: Dual sourcing with nonidentical suppliers

    Ranga V. Ramasesh;J. Keith Ord;Jack C. Hayya

Frequent Co-Authors

Chao-Hsien Chu
Chao-Hsien Chu Pennsylvania State University
Stephen Michael Disney
Stephen Michael Disney University of Exeter

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jack C. Hayya

Recently Published Articles