World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
63
Citations
11932
World Ranking
1626
National Ranking
715

J. Casey Moore publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Casey Moore sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 180 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

J. Casey Moore D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Casey Moore sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Casey Moore was affiliated with the University of California, Santa Cruz in the United States. Their research primarily focused on areas within engineering and earth and planetary sciences, with significant contributions to ocean engineering, environmental chemistry, geophysics, geology, and mechanical engineering.

Their scholarly work covered various key topics, including:

  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Drilling and Well Engineering
  • Geological and Geophysical Studies
  • Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
  • Oil and Gas Production Techniques

Moore frequently published in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) and OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University).

Their recent publications included:

  • DSDP Leg 78A, Hole 542B - Well Logging Data, 2020, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • IODP Expedition 314, Hole C0003A - Well Logging Data, 2020, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • ODP Leg 171A, Hole 1044A - Well Logging Data, 2021, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • ODP Leg 156, Hole 948D - Well Logging Data, 2020, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • IODP Expedition 308, Hole U1322A - Well Logging Data, 2021, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Their collaborative work involved frequent co-authorship with the following researchers:

  • Jan H. Behrmann
  • Saneatsu Saito
  • Michael B. Underwood
  • Gregory F. Moore
  • Harold Tobin

Best Publications

  • Fluids in accretionary prisms

    J. Casey Moore;Peter Vrolijk

  • Oregon Subduction Zone: Venting, Fauna, and Carbonates

    L. D. Kulm;E. Suess;J. C. Moore;B. Carson

  • Updip limit of the seismogenic zone beneath the accretionary prism of southwest Japan: An effect of diagenetic to low-grade metamorphic processes and increasing effective stress

    J. Casey Moore;Demian Saffer

  • Geology of the southern Alaska margin

    George Plafker;J. Casey Moore;Gary R. Winkler

  • Structure and composition of the plate-boundary slip zone for the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake.

    Frederick M. Chester;Christie Rowe;Kohtaro Ujiie;James Kirkpatrick

  • Biological communities at vent sites along the subduction zone off Oregon

    Erwin Suess;Bobb Carson;Scott D. Ritger;J. Casey Moore

  • Tectonics and hydrogeology of accretionary prisms: role of the décollement zone

    J.Casey Moore

  • Structural style and kinematics of an underplated slate belt, Kodiak and adjacent islands, Alaska

    James C. Sample;J. Casey Moore

  • Tectonics and hydrogeology of the northern Barbados Ridge: Results from Ocean Drilling Program Leg 110

    J. Casey Moore;Alain Mascle;Elliott Taylor;Patrick Andreieff

  • Landward vergence and oblique structural trends in the Oregon margin accretionary prism: Implications and effect on fluid flow

    Mary E. MacKay;Gregory F. Moore;Guy R. Cochrane;J. Casey Moore

  • The Molucca Sea Collision Zone, Indonesia

    Eli A. Silver;J. Casey Moore

  • Seismically inferred dilatancy distribution, northern Barbados Ridge decollement: Implications for fluid migration and fault strength

    Thomas H. Shipley;Gregory F. Moore;Nathan L. Bangs;J. Casey Moore

  • Paleogene evolution of the Kodiak Islands, Alaska: Consequences of ridge‐trench interaction in a more southerly latitude

    J. Casey Moore;Tim Byrne;Peter W. Plumley;Mary Reid

  • Thickening of fault zones: A mechanism of melange formation in accreting sediments

    J. Casey Moore;Tim Byrne

  • Warm fluid migration along tectonic melanges in the Kodiak Accretionary Complex, Alaska

    Peter Vrolijk;Georgianna Myers;J. Casey Moore

  • Stress state in the largest displacement area of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake

    Weiren Lin;Weiren Lin;Weiren Lin;Marianne Conin;Marianne Conin;J. Casey Moore;Frederick M. Chester

  • In situ stress state in the Nankai accretionary wedge estimated from borehole wall failures

    Chandong Chang;Lisa C. McNeill;J. Casey Moore;Weiren Lin

  • Offscraping and underthrusting of sediment at the deformation front of the Barbados Ridge: Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 78A

    J. Casey Moore;Bernard Biju-Duval;James A. Bergen;Grant Blackington

  • Abnormal fluid pressures and fault-zone dilation in the Barbados accretionary prism: Evidence from logging while drilling

    J. C. Moore;T. H. Shipley;D. Goldberg;Y. Ogawa

  • The Seismogenic Zone of Subduction Thrust Faults

    Timothy H. Dixon;J. Casey Moore

  • Fluids in accretionary prisms

    M. G. Langseth;J. Casey Moore

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregory F. Moore
Gregory F. Moore University of Hawaii at Manoa
Weiren Lin
Weiren Lin Kyoto University
Thomas H. Shipley
Thomas H. Shipley The University of Texas at Austin
Demian M. Saffer
Demian M. Saffer The University of Texas at Austin
Peter B. Flemings
Peter B. Flemings The University of Texas at Austin
Jim Mori
Jim Mori Kyoto University
Masataka Kinoshita
Masataka Kinoshita University of Tokyo
Kohtaro Ujiie
Kohtaro Ujiie University of Tsukuba
Kevin M. Brown
Kevin M. Brown National Institutes of Health
Timothy Byrne
Timothy Byrne University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career pathways. Many students complement their Earth Science background with online degrees that offer flexibility and targeted skills development. For those interested in creative fields related to environmental communication, exploring online mfa programs can be a great way to gain expertise in storytelling and media.

Additionally, Earth Science graduates often move into leadership roles within organizations. Pursuing the best online master degree in human resource management programs helps them acquire essential management and organizational skills.

For mature learners or those returning to education later in life, there are degrees for seniors designed to offer flexible pacing and support, making Earth Science and related fields more accessible at any age.

Moreover, for careers in information science and preservation of environmental data, choosing an ala-accredited program is crucial. These programs prepare students for roles managing scientific libraries and digital archives linked to Earth Science research.

Best Scientists Citing J. Casey Moore

Recently Published Articles