World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 63 1626 715 180 11932

J. Casey Moore publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by J. Casey Moore between 1960 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. J. Casey Moore published across 62 years, from 1960 to 2021, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2005. 1 of the 196 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1960 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2005. 1960: 1 publication 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 1 publication 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 3 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 8 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 7 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 8 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
1960 2021

196 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
J. Casey Moore: publications per year, 1960 to 2021
Year Publications
1960 1
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 1
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 1
1973 3
1974 4
1975 3
1976 1
1977 2
1978 5
1979 8
1980 3
1981 1
1982 7
1983 1
1984 8
1985 2
1986 7
1987 5
1988 6
1989 2
1990 6
1991 2
1992 5
1993 5
1994 5
1995 4
1996 3
1997 3
1998 3
1999 6
2000 4
2001 3
2002 5
2003 5
2004 8
2005 14
2006 3
2007 9
2008 1
2009 6
2010 3
2011 5
2012 3
2013 6
2014 0
2015 3
2016 2
2017 1
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
Total 196
Download as CSV

J. Casey Moore publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Casey Moore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 178–187 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 180 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414 180
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

J. Casey Moore D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Casey Moore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83 63
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

J. Casey Moore was affiliated with the University of California, Santa Cruz in the United States. Their research primarily focused on areas within engineering and earth and planetary sciences, with significant contributions to ocean engineering, environmental chemistry, geophysics, geology, and mechanical engineering.

Their scholarly work covered various key topics, including:

  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Drilling and Well Engineering
  • Geological and Geophysical Studies
  • Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
  • Oil and Gas Production Techniques

Moore frequently published in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) and OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University).

Their recent publications included:

  • DSDP Leg 78A, Hole 542B - Well Logging Data, 2020, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • IODP Expedition 314, Hole C0003A - Well Logging Data, 2020, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • ODP Leg 171A, Hole 1044A - Well Logging Data, 2021, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • ODP Leg 156, Hole 948D - Well Logging Data, 2020, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • IODP Expedition 308, Hole U1322A - Well Logging Data, 2021, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Their collaborative work involved frequent co-authorship with the following researchers:

  • Jan H. Behrmann
  • Saneatsu Saito
  • Michael B. Underwood
  • Gregory F. Moore
  • Harold Tobin

Best Publications

  • Fluids in accretionary prisms

    J. Casey Moore;Peter Vrolijk

  • Oregon Subduction Zone: Venting, Fauna, and Carbonates

    L. D. Kulm;E. Suess;J. C. Moore;B. Carson

  • Updip limit of the seismogenic zone beneath the accretionary prism of southwest Japan: An effect of diagenetic to low-grade metamorphic processes and increasing effective stress

    J. Casey Moore;Demian Saffer

  • Geology of the southern Alaska margin

    George Plafker;J. Casey Moore;Gary R. Winkler

  • Structure and composition of the plate-boundary slip zone for the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake.

    Frederick M. Chester;Christie Rowe;Kohtaro Ujiie;James Kirkpatrick

  • Biological communities at vent sites along the subduction zone off Oregon

    Erwin Suess;Bobb Carson;Scott D. Ritger;J. Casey Moore

  • Tectonics and hydrogeology of accretionary prisms: role of the décollement zone

    J.Casey Moore

  • Structural style and kinematics of an underplated slate belt, Kodiak and adjacent islands, Alaska

    James C. Sample;J. Casey Moore

  • Tectonics and hydrogeology of the northern Barbados Ridge: Results from Ocean Drilling Program Leg 110

    J. Casey Moore;Alain Mascle;Elliott Taylor;Patrick Andreieff

  • Landward vergence and oblique structural trends in the Oregon margin accretionary prism: Implications and effect on fluid flow

    Mary E. MacKay;Gregory F. Moore;Guy R. Cochrane;J. Casey Moore

  • The Molucca Sea Collision Zone, Indonesia

    Eli A. Silver;J. Casey Moore

  • Seismically inferred dilatancy distribution, northern Barbados Ridge decollement: Implications for fluid migration and fault strength

    Thomas H. Shipley;Gregory F. Moore;Nathan L. Bangs;J. Casey Moore

  • Paleogene evolution of the Kodiak Islands, Alaska: Consequences of ridge‐trench interaction in a more southerly latitude

    J. Casey Moore;Tim Byrne;Peter W. Plumley;Mary Reid

  • Thickening of fault zones: A mechanism of melange formation in accreting sediments

    J. Casey Moore;Tim Byrne

  • Warm fluid migration along tectonic melanges in the Kodiak Accretionary Complex, Alaska

    Peter Vrolijk;Georgianna Myers;J. Casey Moore

  • Stress state in the largest displacement area of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake

    Weiren Lin;Weiren Lin;Weiren Lin;Marianne Conin;Marianne Conin;J. Casey Moore;Frederick M. Chester

  • In situ stress state in the Nankai accretionary wedge estimated from borehole wall failures

    Chandong Chang;Lisa C. McNeill;J. Casey Moore;Weiren Lin

  • Offscraping and underthrusting of sediment at the deformation front of the Barbados Ridge: Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 78A

    J. Casey Moore;Bernard Biju-Duval;James A. Bergen;Grant Blackington

  • Abnormal fluid pressures and fault-zone dilation in the Barbados accretionary prism: Evidence from logging while drilling

    J. C. Moore;T. H. Shipley;D. Goldberg;Y. Ogawa

  • The Seismogenic Zone of Subduction Thrust Faults

    Timothy H. Dixon;J. Casey Moore

  • Fluids in accretionary prisms

    M. G. Langseth;J. Casey Moore

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregory F. Moore
Gregory F. Moore University of Hawaii at Manoa
Weiren Lin
Weiren Lin Kyoto University
Thomas H. Shipley
Thomas H. Shipley The University of Texas at Austin
Demian M. Saffer
Demian M. Saffer The University of Texas at Austin
Peter B. Flemings
Peter B. Flemings The University of Texas at Austin
Jim Mori
Jim Mori Kyoto University
Masataka Kinoshita
Masataka Kinoshita University of Tokyo
Kohtaro Ujiie
Kohtaro Ujiie University of Tsukuba
Kevin M. Brown
Kevin M. Brown National Institutes of Health
Timothy Byrne
Timothy Byrne University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career pathways. Many students complement their Earth Science background with online degrees that offer flexibility and targeted skills development. For those interested in creative fields related to environmental communication, exploring online mfa programs can be a great way to gain expertise in storytelling and media.

Additionally, Earth Science graduates often move into leadership roles within organizations. Pursuing the best online master degree in human resource management programs helps them acquire essential management and organizational skills.

For mature learners or those returning to education later in life, there are degrees for seniors designed to offer flexible pacing and support, making Earth Science and related fields more accessible at any age.

Moreover, for careers in information science and preservation of environmental data, choosing an ala-accredited program is crucial. These programs prepare students for roles managing scientific libraries and digital archives linked to Earth Science research.

Best Scientists Citing J. Casey Moore

Recently Published Articles