World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Henk D. F. H. Schallig

Henk D. F. H. Schallig

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
55
Citations
10600
World Ranking
15087
National Ranking
366

Henk D. F. H. Schallig publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henk D. F. H. Schallig sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 216 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Henk D. F. H. Schallig D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henk D. F. H. Schallig sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Henk D. F. H. Schallig is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and has a research focus primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Infectious Diseases, Parasitology, Epidemiology, and Health, Toxicology, and Mutagenesis.

The scientist has contributed extensively to research on topics such as Malaria Research and Control, Studies on Leishmaniasis, Mosquito-borne diseases and their control, Parasites and Host Interactions, Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment, Trypanosoma species research and implications, as well as Insects and Parasite Interactions.

Several recent papers featuring their work include:

  • Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: A 2022 Updated Narrative Review into Diagnosis and Management Developments (2022), American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
  • Global genome diversity of the Leishmania donovani complex (2020), eLife
  • Effect of co-infection with intestinal parasites on COVID-19 severity: A prospective observational cohort study (2021), EClinicalMedicine
  • New Epidemiological Aspects of Animal Leishmaniosis in Europe: The Role of Vertebrate Hosts Other Than Dogs (2021), Pathogens
  • Survey of Dirofilaria immitis antigen and antibodies to Leishmania infantum and Toxoplasma gondii in cats from Madeira Island, Portugal (2020), Parasites & Vectors

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Schallig include:

  • Pètra F. Mens
  • Halidou Tinto
  • Kenneth Bentum Otabil
  • Emmanuel John Bart-Plange
  • Theophilus Nti Babae

The scientist's publication record shows multiple works in key venues such as:

  • Malaria Journal
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • BMC Infectious Diseases
  • PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
  • Research Square (Research Square)

Schallig has contributed to advancing knowledge within major areas of infectious disease research, with a particular emphasis on parasitic diseases and vector-borne infections. The distribution of their work indicates a substantial engagement with epidemiological and public health perspectives on diseases affecting human and animal populations.

Best Publications

  • PCR diagnosis and characterization of Leishmania in local and imported clinical samples.

    Gabriele Schönian;Abedelmajeed Nasereddin;Nicole Dinse;Carola Schweynoch

  • Cutaneous leishmaniasis: recent developments in diagnosis and management.

    Henry J. C. de Vries;Sophia H. Reedijk;Henk D. F. H. Schallig

  • Comparison of serological assays for the diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis in animals presenting different clinical manifestations

    Eduardo de Castro Ferreira;Marta de Lana;Mariângela Carneiro;Alexandre Barbosa Reis

  • Quantification of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes in differential stages of development by quantitative nucleic acid sequence-based amplification.

    Petra Schneider;Gerard Schoone;Henk Schallig;Danielle Verhage

  • The Effect of Dosing Regimens on the Antimalarial Efficacy of Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data

    Jane Achan;Ishag Adam;Emmanuel Arinaitwe;Elizabeth A. Ashley

  • Microsatellite analysis reveals genetic structure of Leishmania tropica.

    Jan M. Schwenkenbecher;Thierry Wirth;Lionel F. Schnur;Charles L. Jaffe

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis: rapid diagnostic tests versus placental histology, microscopy and PCR for malaria in pregnant women

    Johanna H. Kattenberg;Johanna H. Kattenberg;Eleanor A. Ochodo;Kimberly R. Boer;Henk D. F. H. Schallig

  • Real-Time Nucleic Acid Sequence-Based Amplification Is More Convenient than Real-Time PCR for Quantification of Plasmodium falciparum

    Petra Schneider;Liselotte Wolters;Gerard Schoone;Henk Schallig

  • Residual Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia in Kenyan children after artemisinin-combination therapy is associated with increased transmission to mosquitoes and parasite recurrence

    Khalid B. Beshir;Colin J. Sutherland;Patrick Sawa;Chris J. Drakeley

  • Is molecular biology the best alternative for diagnosis of malaria to microscopy? A comparison between microscopy, antigen detection and molecular tests in rural Kenya and urban Tanzania.

    P. Mens;N. Spieker;S. Omar;M. Heijnen

  • Detection and quantification of Plasmodium falciparum in blood samples using quantitative nucleic acid sequence-based amplification.

    Gerard J. Schoone;Linda Oskam;Nel C. M. Kroon;Henk D. F. H. Schallig

  • (Sub)microscopic Plasmodium falciparum gametocytaemia in Kenyan children after treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine monotherapy or in combination with artesunate

    Petra Schneider;Teun Bousema;Sabah Omar;Louis Gouagna

  • Malaria transmission after artemether-lumefantrine and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine: a randomized trial

    Patrick Sawa;Seif A. Shekalaghe;Chris J. Drakeley;Colin J. Sutherland

  • Comparison between Quantitative Nucleic Acid Sequence-Based Amplification, Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR, and Real-Time PCR for Quantification of Leishmania Parasites

    Wendy van der Meide;Jorge Guerra;Gerard Schoone;Marit Farenhorst

  • Molecular biological applications in the diagnosis and control of leishmaniasis and parasite identification.

    Henk D. F. H. Schallig;Linda Oskam

  • Development of a Reverse Transcriptase Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Assay for the Sensitive Detection of Leishmania Parasites in Clinical Samples

    Emily R. Adams;Gerard J. Schoone;Al Farazdag Ageed;Sayda El Safi

  • Quantitative Nucleic Acid Sequence-Based Assay as a New Molecular Tool for Detection and Quantification of Leishmania Parasites in Skin Biopsy Samples

    Wendy F. van der Meide;Gerard J. Schoone;William R. Faber;Jim E. Zeegelaar

  • Detection and identification of human Plasmodium species with real-time quantitative nucleic acid sequence-based amplification

    Petra F. Mens;Gerard J. Schoone;Piet A. Kager;Henk D. F. H. Schallig

  • A Magneto-Optic Route toward the In Vivo Diagnosis of Malaria: Preliminary Results and Preclinical Trial Data

    Dave M. Newman;John Heptinstall;Raphael J. Matelon;Luke Savage

  • Development and application of 'simple' diagnostic tools for visceral leishmaniasis

    Schallig Hd;Schoone Gj;Kroon Cc;Hailu A

Frequent Co-Authors

Luís Cardoso
Luís Cardoso University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro
Umberto D'Alessandro
Umberto D'Alessandro University of London
Teun Bousema
Teun Bousema Radboud University
Luc Kestens
Luc Kestens University of Antwerp
Robert W. Sauerwein
Robert W. Sauerwein Radboud University
Gabriele Schönian
Gabriele Schönian Charité - University Medicine Berlin
John S. Bradley
John S. Bradley University of California, San Diego
Colin J. Sutherland
Colin J. Sutherland London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Jean-Claude Dujardin
Jean-Claude Dujardin Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp
Martin P. Grobusch
Martin P. Grobusch University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to numerous flexible, online education options and dynamic career paths. For students interested in clinical nutrition, several registered dietitian masters programs are available online. These programs can lead to rewarding roles in healthcare, wellness, and public health.

If you’re aiming for early career opportunities in healthcare, exploring medical assistant courses online is a practical step. These courses typically offer financial aid and can be completed in a flexible, remote format. Certified medical assistants wishing to advance can consider a cma to lpn bridge program online, which streamlines the transition to becoming a licensed practical nurse.

For those seeking a broader science foundation or accelerated completion, online biology programs may be ideal. These programs allow for flexible learning and fast-tracked degree paths while preparing graduates for advanced education or entry-level science roles. Exploring these related online degrees can help you tailor your studies to meet your specific career goals in the sciences and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Henk D. F. H. Schallig

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles