World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
59
Citations
9716
World Ranking
12808
National Ranking
5457

George H. Thomas publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George H. Thomas sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 137 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

George H. Thomas D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George H. Thomas sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

George H. Thomas was affiliated with the Kennedy Krieger Institute in the United States during their career. Their work contributed to the scientific community through various research and academic activities associated with this institution.

Although there are no specific records of recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues linked to their research, their involvement in the field is marked by their association with a prominent research institute.

The available data does not provide detailed information regarding their main fields or subfields of study, nor does it list particular topics or themes that defined their research focus.

George H. Thomas did not have any publicly listed book publications or specific awards recorded in the provided information. Their professional record does not include documented honors or distinctions either.

The absence of specific research outputs or collaborative networks makes it difficult to outline a detailed scholarly profile. However, the affiliation alone indicates a connection to clinical and research activities within the Kennedy Krieger Institute, an organization known for its work in neurological and developmental disorders.

Best Publications

  • Aneurysm Syndromes Caused by Mutations in the TGF-β Receptor

    Bart L. Loeys;Bart L. Loeys;Ulrike Schwarze;Tammy Holm;Bert L. Callewaert

  • Cerebrospinal fluid shunt placement for pseudotumor cerebri-associated intractable headache: predictors of treatment response and an analysis of long-term outcomes.

    Matthew J. Mcgirt;Graeme Woodworth;George Thomas;Neil Miller

  • Genomic insight into the amino acid relations of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, with its symbiotic bacterium Buchnera aphidicola

    A. C. C. Wilson;P. D. Ashton;F. Calevro;H. Charles

  • Whole-genome sequencing of a single proband together with linkage analysis identifies a Mendelian disease gene.

    Nara L. M. Sobreira;Elizabeth T. Cirulli;Dimitrios Avramopoulos;Elizabeth Wohler

  • Complex chromosome rearrangements. Report of a new case and literature review

    G. S. Pai;George H. Thomas;William Mahoney;Barbara R. Migeon

  • The synthesis of 4-methylumbelliferyl α-ketoside of N-acetylneuraminic acid and its use in a fluorometric assay for neuraminidase☆

    Robert W. Myers;Reiko T. Lee;Yuan Chuan Lee;George H. Thomas

  • Hyperammonemia In Women With a Mutation at the Ornithine Carbamoyltransferase Locus A Cause of Postpartum Coma

    P. H. Arn;E. R. Hauser;G. H. Thomas;G. Herman

  • A working group classification of focal prostate atrophy lesions.

    Angelo M. De Marzo;Elizabeth A. Platz;Jonathan I. Epstein;Tehmina Ali

  • Hyperpipecolic acidemia associated with hepatomegaly, mental retardation, optic nerve dysplasia and progressive neurological disease.

    George H. Thomas;Robert H. A. Haslam;Mark L. Batshaw;Arnold J. Capute

  • Recurrent 10q22-q23 Deletions: A Genomic Disorder on 10q Associated with Cognitive and Behavioral Abnormalities

    Jorune Balciuniene;Ningping Feng;Kelly Iyadurai;Kelly Iyadurai;Betsy A Hirsch

  • High male:female ratio of germ-line mutations: an alternative explanation for postulated gestational lethality in males in X-linked dominant disorders.

    G. H. Thomas

  • Maternal uniparental disomy for human chromosome 14, due to loss of a chromosome 14 from somatic cells with t(13;14) trisomy 14

    S E Antonarakis;J L Blouin;J Maher;D Avramopoulos

  • Excision repair (dimer excision, strand breakage and repair replication) in primary cultures of eukaryotic (bovine) cells

    J.E. Cleaver;G.H. Thomas;J.E. Trosko;J.T. Lett

  • Infantile form of sialic acid storage disorder: Clinical, ultrastructural, and biochemical studies in two siblings

    M. Tondeur;J. Libert;E. Vamos;F. Van Hoof

  • 3q29 interstitial microduplication: a new syndrome in a three-generation family.

    Emily C. Lisi;Ada Hamosh;Kimberly F. Doheny;Elizabeth Squibb

  • Arginine-responsive asymptomatic hyperammonemia in the premature infant

    Mark L. Batshaw;Renee C. Wachtel;George H. Thomas;Andrea Starrett

  • New Approaches to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Inborn Errors of Urea Synthesis

    Mark L. Batshaw;George H. Thomas;Saul W. Brusilow

  • Sialidase (α‐N‐acetyl neuraminidase) deficiency: the enzyme defect in an adult with macular cherry‐red spots and myoclonus without dementia

    George H. Thomas;Robert E. Tipton;Lawrence T. Ch'ien;Linda W. Reynolds

  • Clinical, cytogenetic, and fluorescence in situ hybridization findings in two cases of "complete ring" syndrome.

    S. Sigurdardottir;B. K. Goodman;J. Rutberg;G. H. Thomas

  • Mucolipidosis III (Pseudo-Hurler Polydystrophy): Multiple Lysosomal Enzyme Abnormalities in Serum and Cultured Fibroblast Cells

    George H Thomas;Harold A Taylor;Linda W Reynolds;Carol S Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan Pevsner
Jonathan Pevsner National Institute of Mental Health
David Valle
David Valle Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Ada Hamosh
Ada Hamosh Johns Hopkins University
Kimberly F. Doheny
Kimberly F. Doheny Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Reed E. Pyeritz
Reed E. Pyeritz University of Pennsylvania
Hugo W. Moser
Hugo W. Moser Kennedy Krieger Institute
Beatrice S. Knudsen
Beatrice S. Knudsen University of Utah
Sabina Signoretti
Sabina Signoretti Brigham and Women's Hospital
Elizabeth A. Platz
Elizabeth A. Platz Johns Hopkins University
Haig H. Kazazian
Haig H. Kazazian Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a range of rewarding online degree options and career pathways in the USA. Students interested in healthcare can consider online nursing programs, which offer flexibility and foundational training for in-demand nursing roles. For those passionate about health, diet, and wellness, pursuing an online nutrition degree can prepare graduates for roles in clinical or community nutrition, public health, and food science.

Students interested in healthcare leadership may seek out programs such as a Master of Healthcare Administration. Choosing a cahme accreditation for mha programs is vital, as accredited programs offer rigorous standards and industry recognition, enhancing career prospects. For those advancing toward the highest levels of nursing, some are choosing a dnp program no clinical, which allows doctorate-level studies to be completed online without on-site clinicals.

These diverse educational tracks all complement a strong background in Biology and Biochemistry, and are tailored to meet evolving industry needs, offering flexibility and specialized skill development for today’s students.

Best Scientists Citing George H. Thomas

Recently Published Articles