World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
46
Citations
8760
World Ranking
5130
National Ranking
340

Gareth Hinds publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gareth Hinds sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 183 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Gareth Hinds D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gareth Hinds sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering (UK)

Best Publications

  • In-operando high-speed tomography of lithium-ion batteries during thermal runaway

    Donal P. Finegan;Mario Scheel;James B. Robinson;Bernhard Tjaden

  • Application of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy to commercial Li-ion cells: a review

    Nina Meddings;Marco Heinrich;Frédéric Overney;Jong-Sook Lee

  • 3D microstructure design of lithium-ion battery electrodes assisted by X-ray nano-computed tomography and modelling.

    Xuekun Lu;Xuekun Lu;Antonio Bertei;Donal P. Finegan;Chun Tan

  • Characterising thermal runaway within lithium-ion cells by inducing and monitoring internal short circuits.

    Donal P. Finegan;Eric Darcy;Matthew Keyser;Bernhard Tjaden

  • Influence of magnetic forces on electrochemical mass transport

    G. Hinds;J.M.D. Coey;M.E.G. Lyons

  • Impact of impurities on water electrolysis: a review

    Unknown

  • Corrosion challenges towards a sustainable society

    Unknown

  • Magnetic Field Effects on Copper Electrolysis

    G. Hinds;F. E. Spada;J. M. D. Coey;and T. R. Ní Mhíocháin

  • Mass transport in PEM water electrolysers: A review

    M. Maier;K. Smith;J. Dodwell;G. Hinds

  • Identifying the Cause of Rupture of Li-Ion Batteries during Thermal Runaway

    Donal P. Finegan;Eric Darcy;Matthew Keyser;Bernhard Tjaden

  • Multi-objective optimization of lithium-ion battery model using genetic algorithm approach

    Liqiang Zhang;Lixin Wang;Gareth Hinds;Chao Lyu

  • Investigating lithium-ion battery materials during overcharge-induced thermal runaway: an operando and multi-scale X-ray CT study

    Donal P. Finegan;Mario Scheel;James B. Robinson;Bernhard Tjaden

  • Non-uniform temperature distribution in Li-ion batteries during discharge – A combined thermal imaging, X-ray micro-tomography and electrochemical impedance approach

    James B. Robinson;Jawwad A. Darr;David S. Eastwood;Gareth Hinds

  • Microstructural Evolution of Battery Electrodes During Calendering

    Xuekun Lu;Xuekun Lu;Sohrab R. Daemi;Antonio Bertei;Matthew D.R. Kok

  • Tracking Internal Temperature and Structural Dynamics during Nail Penetration of Lithium-Ion Cells

    Donal P. Finegan;Donal P. Finegan;Bernhard Tjaden;Thomas M. M. Heenan;Rhodri Jervis

  • Ex Situ Characterization of 1T/2H MoS2 and Their Carbon Composites for Energy Applications, a Review

    Unknown

  • Critical Review of the Use of Reference Electrodes in Li-Ion Batteries: A Diagnostic Perspective

    Rinaldo Raccichini;Marco Amores;Gareth Hinds

  • Parameter Sensitivity Analysis of Cylindrical LiFePO4 Battery Performance Using Multi-Physics Modeling

    Liqiang Zhang;Chao Lyu;Gareth Hinds;Lixin Wang

  • Effect of a Magnetic Field on Electrodeposition: Chronoamperometry of Ag, Cu, Zn, and Bi

    C. O’Reilly;G. Hinds;J. M. D. Coey

  • Towards more representative test methods for corrosion resistance of PEMFC metallic bipolar plates

    G. Hinds;E. Brightman

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul R. Shearing
Paul R. Shearing University College London
Dan J. L. Brett
Dan J. L. Brett University College London
Donal P. Finegan
Donal P. Finegan National Renewable Energy Laboratory
J. M. D. Coey
J. M. D. Coey Trinity College Dublin
Alexander Rack
Alexander Rack European Synchrotron Radiation Facility
Marco Di Michiel
Marco Di Michiel European Synchrotron Radiation Facility
Gregory J. Offer
Gregory J. Offer Imperial College London
Marc-Olivier Coppens
Marc-Olivier Coppens University College London
Emma Kendrick
Emma Kendrick University of Birmingham
Peter D. Lee
Peter D. Lee University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Gareth Hinds

Recently Published Articles