World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frank W. Sharbrough

Frank W. Sharbrough

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
77
Citations
22134
World Ranking
1835
National Ranking
105

Frank W. Sharbrough publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank W. Sharbrough sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 207 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Frank W. Sharbrough D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank W. Sharbrough sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank W. Sharbrough is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their professional profile reflects involvement in academic research within this institution.

There are no recent papers listed under their name, nor are there details regarding frequent co-authors or common publication venues. Similarly, specific information about book publications, including publishers and numbers, is not available.

Details pertaining to main fields of study, subfields, and main topics of work are also not provided. No awards or honors have been recorded for this individual.

Given the limited data available, the profile centers primarily on their institutional association. No additional publication, research focus, or collaborative patterns can be outlined at this time.

Best Publications

  • Correlation of cerebral blood flow and electroencephalographic changes during carotid endarterectomy: with results of surgery and hemodynamics of cerebral ischemia.

    Sundt Tm;Sharbrough Fw;Piepgras Dg;Kearns Tp

  • Anterior temporal lobes and hippocampal formations: normative volumetric measurements from MR images in young adults.

    C R Jack;C K Twomey;A R Zinsmeister;F W Sharbrough

  • Correlation of Continuous Electroencephalograms With Cerebral Blood Flow Measurements During Carotid Endarterectomy

    Frank W. Sharbrough;Joseph M. Messick;Thoralf M. Sundt

  • Magnetic resonance imaging–based volume studies in temporal lobe epilepsy: Pathological correlations

    Gregory D Cascino;Clifford R Jr. Jack;Joseph E Parisi;F. W. Sharbrough

  • Temporal lobe seizures: lateralization with MR volume measurements of the hippocampal formation.

    C R Jack;F W Sharbrough;C K Twomey;G D Cascino

  • Magnetic resonance image-based hippocampal volumetry : correlation with outcome after temporal lobectomy

    Clifford R Jr. Jack;F. W. Sharbrough;Gregory D Cascino;K. A. Hirschorn

  • Subtraction ictal SPECT co‐registered to MRI improves clinical usefulness of SPECT in localizing the surgical seizure focus

    Unknown

  • Sensory motor cortex: correlation of presurgical mapping with functional MR imaging and invasive cortical mapping.

    C R Jack;R M Thompson;R K Butts;F W Sharbrough

  • Predictors of outcome of anterior temporal lobectomy for intractable epilepsy A multivariate study

    K. Radhakrishnan;El L. So;Pl L. Silbert;Cr R. Jack

  • Cerebral blood flow measurements and electroencephalograms during carotid endarterectomy.

    Thoralf M. Sundt;Frank W. Sharbrough;Robert E. Anderson;John D. Michenfelder

  • MRI hippocampal volumes and memory function before and after temporal lobectomy

    M. R. Trenerry;C. R. Jack;R. J. Ivnik;F. W. Sharbrough

  • Spatial Filtering of Multichannel Electroencephalographic Recordings Through Principal Component Analysis by Singular Value Decomposition

    Terrence D. Lagerlund;Frank W. Sharbrough;Neil E. Busacker

  • Nonpathologic Factors Influencing Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials

    James J. Stockard;Janet E. Stockard;Frank W. Sharbrough

  • Prognostic value of myoclonus status in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest

    Eelco F. M. Wijdicks;Joseph E. Parisi;Frank W. Sharbrough

  • Detection and localization of occult lesions with brainstem auditory responses

    J J Stockard;J E Stockard;F W Sharbrough

  • Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome: a cause of neurologic dysfunction after carotid endarterectomy.

    Martha M. Reigel;Larry H. Hollier;Thoralf M. Sundt;David G. Piepgras

  • Localization of the epileptic focus by low-resolution electromagnetic tomography in patients with a lesion demonstrated by MRI.

    Gregory A. Worrell;Terrence D. Lagerlund;Frank W. Sharbrough;Benjamin H. Brinkmann

  • Gelastic seizures and hypothalamic hamartomas Evaluation of patients undergoing chronic intracranial EEG monitoring and outcome of surgical treatment

    G. D. Cascino;F. Andermann;S. F. Berkovic;R. I. Kuzniecky

  • Factors predictive of the outcome of frontal lobe epilepsy surgery

    R. K. Mosewich;Elson L. So;T. J. O'Brien;G. D. Cascino

  • Alpha-coma. Electroencephalographic, clinical, pathologic, and etiologic correlations.

    Barbara F. Westmoreland;Donald W. Klass;Frank W. Sharbrough;Thomas J. Reagan

  • Correlation of Cerebral Blood Flow and Electroencephalographic Changes during Carotid Endarterectomy, with Results of Surgery and Hemodynamics of Cerebral Ischemia

    T. M. Sundt;F. W. Sharbrough;D. G. Piepgras;T. P. Kearns

Frequent Co-Authors

Thoralf M. Sundt
Thoralf M. Sundt Harvard University
Clifford R. Jack
Clifford R. Jack Mayo Clinic
Elson L. So
Elson L. So Mayo Clinic
Patrick J. Kelly
Patrick J. Kelly New York University
W. Richard Marsh
W. Richard Marsh Mayo Clinic
Fredric B. Meyer
Fredric B. Meyer Mayo Clinic
Terence J. O'Brien
Terence J. O'Brien Monash University
Robert J. Ivnik
Robert J. Ivnik Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Frank W. Sharbrough

Recently Published Articles