World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 39 5559 5157 929 863 163 9104

Frank Ackerman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frank Ackerman between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frank Ackerman published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2008. 1 of the 181 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2008. 1971: 2 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1971 2025

181 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frank Ackerman: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 2
1972 1
1973 0
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 2
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 3
1997 7
1998 0
1999 3
2000 4
2001 11
2002 10
2003 3
2004 3
2005 14
2006 6
2007 7
2008 18
2009 12
2010 13
2011 13
2012 12
2013 14
2014 5
2015 3
2016 4
2017 3
2018 1
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 181
Download as CSV

Frank Ackerman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Ackerman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 154–163 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 163 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411 163
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Frank Ackerman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Ackerman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300 39
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Frank Ackerman is affiliated with the Stockholm Environment Institute in the United Kingdom. Their professional background is centered within this research institution.

No recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues have been listed for Frank Ackerman. Similarly, there are no book publications recorded under their name.

Their profile does not include any specified main fields or subfields of study, nor are there detailed main topics of work documented. No awards have been reported in relation to their career.

Based on the available data, Frank Ackerman maintains a professional presence primarily through their affiliation with the Stockholm Environment Institute, with a focus likely aligned with environmental research given the nature of the institution.

Best Publications

  • Assessing "dangerous climate change": required reduction of carbon emissions to protect young people, future generations and nature.

    James E. Hansen;Pushker A. Kharecha;Pushker A. Kharecha;Makiko H. Sato;Valerie Masson-Delmotte

  • Pricing the Priceless: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Environmental Protection

    Frank Ackerman;Lisa Heinzerling

  • INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS

    J. C. Minx;T. Wiedmann;R. Wood;G. P. Peters

  • Priceless: On Knowing the Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing

    Frank Ackerman;Lisa Heinzerling

  • Why Do We Recycle?: Markets, Values, and Public Policy

    Frank Ackerman

  • Looming Global-Scale Failures and Missing Institutions

    Brian Walker;Brian Walker;Scott Barrett;Stephen Polasky;Stephen Polasky;Victor Galaz

  • Limitations of integrated assessment models of climate change

    Frank Ackerman;Stephen J. DeCanio;Richard B. Howarth;Kristen Sheeran;Kristen Sheeran

  • Still dead after all these years: interpreting the failure of general equilibrium theory

    Frank Ackerman

  • Climate risks and carbon prices: Revising the social cost of carbon

    Frank Ackerman;Elizabeth A. Stanton

  • The Consumer Society

    Neva R. Goodwin;Frank Ackerman;David Kiron

  • The economics of atrazine.

    Frank Ackerman

  • Inside the integrated assessment models: Four issues in climate economics

    Elizabeth A. Stanton;Frank Ackerman;Sivan Kartha

  • Fat tails, exponents, extreme uncertainty: Simulating catastrophe in DICE

    Frank Ackerman;Elizabeth A. Stanton;Ramón Bueno

  • Consumed in Theory: Alternative Perspectives on the Economics of Consumption

    Frank Ackerman

  • The carbon content of Japan-US trade

    Frank Ackerman;Masanobu Ishikawa;Mikio Suga

  • The Shrinking Gains from Trade: A Critical Assessment of Doha Round Projections

    Frank Ackerman

  • Is there a water-energy nexus in electricity generation? Long-term scenarios for the western United States

    Frank Ackerman;Jeremy Fisher

  • Can We Afford the Future?: The Economics of a Warming World

    Frank Ackerman

  • Waste Management and Climate Change

    Frank Ackerman

  • The Flawed Foundations of General Equilibrium Theory: Critical Essays on Economic Theory

    Frank Ackerman;Alejandro Nadal Egea;Carlo Benetti;Kevin P. Gallagher

  • The Caribbean and Climate Change: The Costs of Inaction

    R. Bueno;C. Herzfeld;E. A. Stanton;F. Ackerman

  • The Social Cost of Carbon

    Frank Ackerman;Elizabeth A. Stanton

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin P. Gallagher
Kevin P. Gallagher Boston University
Makiko Sato
Makiko Sato Columbia University
James Hansen
James Hansen Columbia University
Camille Parmesan
Camille Parmesan The University of Texas at Austin
Richard B. Howarth
Richard B. Howarth Dartmouth College
Jeffrey D. Sachs
Jeffrey D. Sachs Columbia University
James C. Zachos
James C. Zachos University of California, Santa Cruz
Konrad Steffen
Konrad Steffen Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Peter Smith
Peter Smith University of Aberdeen
Johan Rockström
Johan Rockström Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in Social Sciences and Humanities? The rise of online education has expanded access to reputable degrees and diverse career paths in this field. Flexible, accredited options can help you progress quickly while balancing other commitments.

If you are interested in psychology practice or counseling, psyd online programs offer rigorous training in clinical skills, preparing graduates for licensure and advanced roles. Similarly, those seeking fast entry into family therapy may explore accelerated mft programs online to complete coursework in a shorter time frame.

For those aiming for flexibility and affordability, a masters in psychology online provides a broad foundation for roles in counseling, market research, human resources, and more. Aspiring educators and administrators can benefit from accelerated edd programs online that help you reach leadership positions quickly.

Research your options carefully to find accredited, reputable programs aligned with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Frank Ackerman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles