World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 38 6441 5965 88 82 170 6019

Farrokh Nadim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Farrokh Nadim between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Farrokh Nadim published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2009. 4 of the 230 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2009. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 5 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1983 2025

230 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Farrokh Nadim: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 1
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 2
1989 1
1990 3
1991 2
1992 2
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 5
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 2
2001 3
2002 1
2003 2
2004 9
2005 7
2006 8
2007 10
2008 8
2009 19
2010 9
2011 6
2012 11
2013 16
2014 17
2015 13
2016 9
2017 11
2018 6
2019 6
2020 6
2021 7
2022 8
2023 8
2024 2
2025 2
Total 230
Download as CSV

Farrokh Nadim publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Farrokh Nadim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 168–177 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 170 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490 170
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Farrokh Nadim D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Farrokh Nadim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344 38
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Farrokh Nadim is affiliated with the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute in Norway. Their research predominantly spans across the fields of Engineering and Environmental Science, with an emphasis on Civil and Structural Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, and Water Science and Technology.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics including:

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies

Farrokh Nadim has authored multiple publications in various scientific venues. The frequent publication outlets include:

  • Landslides
  • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
  • Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
  • Georisk Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards
  • Engineering Geology

Among recent papers associated with their research are:

  • "A new look at the statistics of tailings dam failures", 2022, Engineering Geology
  • "Considerations for using critical state soil mechanics based constitutive models for capturing static liquefaction failure of tailings dams", 2024, Computers and Geotechnics
  • "CPT-Based Axial Capacity Design Method for Driven Piles in Clay", 2022, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
  • "Increased human risk caused by cascading hazards - A framework", 2022, The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Risk Assessment of Terrestrial Transportation Infrastructures Exposed to Extreme Events", 2021, Infrastructures

In their collaborative work, Farrokh Nadim has frequently co-authored with the following researchers:

  • Suzanne Lacasse
  • Luca Piciullo
  • Zhongqiang Liu
  • Nezam Bozorgzadeh

Best Publications

  • Uncertainties in characterising soil properties

    S Lacasse;F Nadim

  • Global landslide and avalanche hotspots

    Farrokh Nadim;Oddvar Kjekstad;Pascal Peduzzi;Christian Herold

  • A conceptual framework for quantitative estimation of physical vulnerability to landslides

    Marco Uzielli;Farrokh Nadim;Suzanne Lacasse;Amir M. Kaynia

  • Seismically Induced Movement of Retaining Walls

    Farrokh Nadim;Robert V. Whitman

  • Quantitative vulnerability estimation for scenario-based landslide hazards

    Zhihong Li;Zhihong Li;Farrokh Nadim;Hongwei Huang;Marco Uzielli

  • Soil variability analysis for geotechnical practice

    K Phoon;F Nadim;M Uzielli;S Lacasse

  • Landslide Risk Assessment and Mitigation Strategy

    Suzanne Lacasse;Farrokh Nadim

  • Statistical modelling of Europe-wide landslide susceptibility using limited landslide inventory data

    M. Van Den Eeckhaut;J. Hervás;C. Jaedicke;J.-P. Malet

  • Submarine debris flow impact on pipelines — Part I: Experimental investigation

    Arash Zakeri;Arash Zakeri;Kaare Høeg;Kaare Høeg;Farrokh Nadim

  • Brief communication "Landslide Early Warning System: toolbox and general concepts"

    Emanuele Intrieri;Giovanni Gigli;Nicola Casagli;F. Nadim

  • Uncertainties in Characterising Soil Properties

    Suzanne Lacasse;Farrokh Nadim

  • Submarine debris flow impact on pipelines — Part II: Numerical analysis

    Arash Zakeri;Arash Zakeri;Kaare Høeg;Kaare Høeg;Farrokh Nadim

  • A three-level framework for multi-risk assessment

    Zhongqiang Liu;Farrokh Nadim;Alexander Garcia-Aristizabal;Arnaud Mignan

  • Tsunami hazard and exposure on the global scale

    Finn Løvholt;Sylfest Glimsdal;Carl B. Harbitz;Natalia Zamora

  • Identification of landslide hazard and risk ‘hotspots’ in Europe

    Christian Jaedicke;Miet Van Den Eeckhaut;Farrokh Nadim;Javier Hervás

  • Seismic triggering of submarine slides in soft cohesive soil deposits

    G Biscontin;J.M Pestana;F Nadim

  • Stochastic design of an early warning system

    Zenon Medina-Cetina;Farrokh Nadim

  • Soil conditions and slope stability in the Ormen Lange area

    Tore J. Kvalstad;Farrokh Nadim;Amir M. Kaynia;Karl Henrik Mokkelbost

  • Tsunami risk reduction – are we better prepared today than in 2004?

    Finn Løvholt;Neysa J. Setiadi;Joern Birkmann;Carl B. Harbitz

  • Slope reliability analysis accounting for spatial variation

    B. K. Low;S. Lacasse;F. Nadim

  • Evolution of Mass Movements near Epicentre of Wenchuan Earthquake, the First Eight Years

    Shuai Zhang;Shuai Zhang;Li Min Zhang;Suzanne Lacasse;Farrokh Nadim

  • Global tsunami hazard and exposure due to large co-seismic slip

    Finn Løvholt;Finn Løvholt;Sylfest Glimsdal;Sylfest Glimsdal;Carl B. Harbitz;Carl B. Harbitz;Nick Horspool;Nick Horspool

Frequent Co-Authors

Kaare Høeg
Kaare Høeg Norwegian Geotechnical Institute
Carl B. Harbitz
Carl B. Harbitz Norwegian Geotechnical Institute
Finn Løvholt
Finn Løvholt Norwegian Geotechnical Institute
Amir M. Kaynia
Amir M. Kaynia Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Pascal Peduzzi
Pascal Peduzzi University of Geneva
Maosong Huang
Maosong Huang Tongji University
Carl Fredrik Forsberg
Carl Fredrik Forsberg Norwegian Geotechnical Institute
Barry Lehane
Barry Lehane University of Western Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens doors to diverse career paths often supported by complementary skills. For instance, understanding how to organize and manage scientific data can be enhanced through a is library science a good career program, which teaches information management relevant to research and environmental documentation.

Visual communication also plays a significant role in Earth Science fields such as geology and environmental studies. Pursuing the cheapest online photography degree can equip students with the technical skills to capture and present vital scientific imagery.

Veterans seeking to combine their discipline with creative expression might benefit from specialized programs like the best online photography degree programs for veterans, offering tailored opportunities that support both career transitions and academic growth.

In addition, developing language proficiency through an online degrees in Spanish can enhance communication and collaboration in global Earth Science projects, increasing employability in multinational environments.

Best Scientists Citing Farrokh Nadim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles