World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
5453
World Ranking
7941
National Ranking
52

Esben Thade Petersen publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Esben Thade Petersen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 114 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Esben Thade Petersen D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Esben Thade Petersen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Non-invasive measurement of perfusion: a critical review of arterial spin labelling techniques

    E. T. Petersen;I. Zimine;Y. C.L. Ho;Xavier Golay

  • Model-free arterial spin labeling quantification approach for perfusion MRI†

    Esben Thade Petersen;Tchoyoson Lim;Xavier Golay

  • The QUASAR reproducibility study, Part II: Results from a multi-center Arterial Spin Labeling test-retest study.

    Esben Thade Petersen;Kim Mouridsen;Xavier Golay

  • Pulsed star labeling of arterial regions (PULSAR): A robust regional perfusion technique for high field imaging

    Xavier Golay;Esben T. Petersen;Francis Hui

  • Chronic Pain: Lost Inhibition?

    Luke A. Henderson;Chris C. Peck;Chris C. Peck;Esben T. Petersen;Caroline D. Rae

  • In Vivo Blood T-1 Measurements at 1.5 T, 3 T, and 7 T

    X. Zhang;E. T. Petersen;E. Ghariq;J. B. De Vis

  • Accuracy and precision of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion during baseline and hypercapnia: A head-to-head comparison with 15O H2O positron emission tomography

    D.F.R. Heijtel;H.J.M.M. Mutsaerts;E. Bakker;P. Schober

  • Territorial arterial spin labeling in the assessment of collateral circulation: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

    Soke Miang Chng;Esben Thade Petersen;Ivan Zimine;Yih Yian Sitoh

  • Arterial spin labeling: benefits and pitfalls of high magnetic field.

    Xavier Golay;Esben T. Petersen

  • Cerebral Border Zones between Distal End Branches of Intracranial Arteries: MR Imaging

    Jeroen Hendrikse;Esben Thade Petersen;Peter Jan van Laar;Xavier Golay

  • Age‐related changes in brain hemodynamics; A calibrated MRI study

    J.B. De Vis;J. Hendrikse;A. Bhogal;A. Adams

  • A method for rapid in vivo measurement of blood T1

    Marta Varela;Joseph V. Hajnal;Esben T. Petersen;Xavier Golay

  • Regional cerebral perfusion in patients with Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: effect of APOE Epsilon4 allele

    Sun Mi Kim;Min Ji Kim;Hak Young Rhee;Chang-Woo Ryu

  • Multi-vendor reliability of arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI using a near-identical sequence: Implications for multi-center studies

    Henri J. M. M. Mutsaerts;Matthias J. P. van Osch;Fernando O. Zelaya;Danny J. J. Wang

  • Differential brain activity in subjects with painful trigeminal neuropathy and painful temporomandibular disorder.

    Andrew M. Youssef;Sylvia M. Gustin;Paul G. Nash;Jenna M. Reeves

  • The effect of physical exercise on cerebral blood flow in Alzheimer's disease.

    Lisa A. van der Kleij;Esben T. Petersen;Hartwig R. Siebner;Jeroen Hendrikse

  • Cerebral arterial bolus arrival time is prolonged in multiple sclerosis and associated with disability.

    David Paling;Esben Thade Petersen;Daniel J. Tozer;Daniel R. Altmann;Daniel R. Altmann

  • Quantitative assessment of cerebral hemodynamic parameters by QUASAR arterial spin labeling in Alzheimer's disease and cognitively normal Elderly adults at 3-tesla.

    Henry K.F. Mak;Queenie Chan;Zhipeng Zhang;Esben T. Petersen

  • Vascular Disorders: Insights from Arterial Spin Labeling

    Jeroen Hendrikse;Esben Thade Petersen;Xavier Golay

  • Cerebral perfusion measurements in elderly with hypertension using arterial spin labeling

    H. J. M. M. Mutsaerts;J. W. van Dalen;D. F. R. Heijtel;P. F. C. Groot

  • Mapping of cerebral perfusion territories using territorial arterial spin labeling: techniques and clinical application

    Nolan S. Hartkamp;Esben T. Petersen;Jill B. De Vis;Reinoud P. H. Bokkers

Frequent Co-Authors

Olaf B. Paulson
Olaf B. Paulson University of Copenhagen
Floris Groenendaal
Floris Groenendaal Utrecht University
Messoud Ashina
Messoud Ashina University of Copenhagen
Henrik Larsson
Henrik Larsson Karolinska Institute
Frank van Bel
Frank van Bel Utrecht University
Charles B. L. M. Majoie
Charles B. L. M. Majoie University of Amsterdam
Joseph V. Hajnal
Joseph V. Hajnal King's College London
Greg M. Murray
Greg M. Murray University of Sydney
Luke A. Henderson
Luke A. Henderson University of Sydney
Danielle van Westen
Danielle van Westen Lund University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often opens doors to a wide array of related online degree options and career pathways. For those interested in understanding the human mind and behavior, consider an accredited online psychology degree, which can serve as a pathway into research, education, or counseling.

If your interests include social work and helping communities, look into msw programs with high acceptance rate. These flexible options can prepare you for roles in mental health services and advocacy.

For advanced clinical practice, there are also reputable psyd online programs tailored for those seeking specialized expertise and licensure in psychology.

Additionally, those interested in family therapy may find accelerated education through online mft programs, which can lead to fulfilling careers in marriage and family counseling.

Each pathway offers unique benefits, so reflect on your career goals and select the program that aligns best with your interests in neuroscience and mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Esben Thade Petersen

Recently Published Articles