World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Physics 80 3045 2892 1469 1368 387 18460

Edward M. Cackett publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Edward M. Cackett between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Edward M. Cackett published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 20.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 48 publications in 2018. 46 of the 434 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 48. Peak 48 publications in 2018. 2005: 6 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 42 publications 2018: 48 publications 2019: 41 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 29 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 25 publications
2005 2025

434 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Edward M. Cackett: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 6
2006 8
2007 9
2008 12
2009 13
2010 15
2011 13
2012 21
2013 28
2014 24
2015 9
2016 20
2017 42
2018 48
2019 41
2020 23
2021 20
2022 7
2023 29
2024 21
2025 25
Total 434
Download as CSV

Edward M. Cackett publication distribution in Physics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Physics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward M. Cackett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 70 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 103–122 to 1,469+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 323–342 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,469 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 383–402 publications, is where this scientist sits. 103–122 publications: 7 scientists 123–142 publications: 10 scientists 143–162 publications: 31 scientists 163–182 publications: 35 scientists 183–202 publications: 53 scientists 203–222 publications: 81 scientists 223–242 publications: 85 scientists 243–262 publications: 112 scientists 263–282 publications: 114 scientists 283–302 publications: 126 scientists 303–322 publications: 136 scientists 323–342 publications: 162 scientists 343–362 publications: 155 scientists 363–382 publications: 156 scientists 383–402 publications: 134 scientists 403–422 publications: 145 scientists 423–442 publications: 147 scientists 443–462 publications: 131 scientists 463–482 publications: 131 scientists 483–502 publications: 116 scientists 503–522 publications: 106 scientists 523–542 publications: 103 scientists 543–562 publications: 87 scientists 563–582 publications: 84 scientists 583–602 publications: 94 scientists 603–622 publications: 70 scientists 623–642 publications: 76 scientists 643–662 publications: 60 scientists 663–682 publications: 54 scientists 683–702 publications: 60 scientists 703–722 publications: 48 scientists 723–742 publications: 64 scientists 743–762 publications: 48 scientists 763–782 publications: 37 scientists 783–802 publications: 43 scientists 803–822 publications: 34 scientists 823–842 publications: 36 scientists 843–862 publications: 32 scientists 863–882 publications: 32 scientists 883–902 publications: 31 scientists 903–922 publications: 25 scientists 923–942 publications: 15 scientists 943–962 publications: 24 scientists 963–982 publications: 13 scientists 983–1,002 publications: 21 scientists 1,003–1,022 publications: 21 scientists 1,023–1,042 publications: 16 scientists 1,043–1,062 publications: 9 scientists 1,063–1,082 publications: 19 scientists 1,083–1,102 publications: 11 scientists 1,103–1,122 publications: 17 scientists 1,123–1,142 publications: 11 scientists 1,143–1,162 publications: 7 scientists 1,163–1,182 publications: 4 scientists 1,183–1,202 publications: 10 scientists 1,203–1,222 publications: 8 scientists 1,223–1,242 publications: 16 scientists 1,243–1,262 publications: 4 scientists 1,263–1,282 publications: 10 scientists 1,283–1,302 publications: 5 scientists 1,303–1,322 publications: 7 scientists 1,323–1,342 publications: 4 scientists 1,343–1,362 publications: 8 scientists 1,363–1,382 publications: 6 scientists 1,383–1,402 publications: 7 scientists 1,403–1,422 publications: 3 scientists 1,423–1,442 publications: 4 scientists 1,443–1,462 publications: 4 scientists 1,463–1,468 publications: 3 scientists 1,469+ publications: 100 scientists
103–122 publications 1,469+

This scientist: 387 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,469 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Physics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,678 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
103–122 7
123–142 10
143–162 31
163–182 35
183–202 53
203–222 81
223–242 85
243–262 112
263–282 114
283–302 126
303–322 136
323–342 162
343–362 155
363–382 156
383–402 134 387
403–422 145
423–442 147
443–462 131
463–482 131
483–502 116
503–522 106
523–542 103
543–562 87
563–582 84
583–602 94
603–622 70
623–642 76
643–662 60
663–682 54
683–702 60
703–722 48
723–742 64
743–762 48
763–782 37
783–802 43
803–822 34
823–842 36
843–862 32
863–882 32
883–902 31
903–922 25
923–942 15
943–962 24
963–982 13
983–1,002 21
1,003–1,022 21
1,023–1,042 16
1,043–1,062 9
1,063–1,082 19
1,083–1,102 11
1,103–1,122 17
1,123–1,142 11
1,143–1,162 7
1,163–1,182 4
1,183–1,202 10
1,203–1,222 8
1,223–1,242 16
1,243–1,262 4
1,263–1,282 10
1,283–1,302 5
1,303–1,322 7
1,323–1,342 4
1,343–1,362 8
1,363–1,382 6
1,383–1,402 7
1,403–1,422 3
1,423–1,442 4
1,443–1,462 4
1,463–1,468 3
1,469+ 100
Download as CSV

Edward M. Cackett D-index placement in Physics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Physics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward M. Cackett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 59 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 185+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 167. Most scientists, 167, have 80–81 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 185 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 76 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 110 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 143 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 153 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 144 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 167 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 167 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 166 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 132 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 155 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 134 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 137 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 102 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 112 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 110 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 116 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 97 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 103 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 87 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 90 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 78 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 75 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 67 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 69 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 59 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 53 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 42 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 41 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 33 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 32 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 45 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 19 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 24 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 28 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 31 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 20 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 12 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 24 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 23 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 15 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 15 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 11 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 17 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 12 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 11 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 9 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 9 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 11 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 4 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 8 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 5 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 3 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 4 scientists 184 D-Index: 4 scientists 185+ D-Index: 99 scientists
70–71 D-Index 185+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 185 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Physics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,678 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 76
72–73 110
74–75 143
76–77 153
78–79 144
80–81 167 80
82–83 167
84–85 166
86–87 132
88–89 155
90–91 134
92–93 137
94–95 102
96–97 112
98–99 110
100–101 116
102–103 97
104–105 103
106–107 87
108–109 90
110–111 67
112–113 78
114–115 75
116–117 67
118–119 69
120–121 60
122–123 59
124–125 53
126–127 42
128–129 41
130–131 33
132–133 32
134–135 45
136–137 19
138–139 24
140–141 28
142–143 31
144–145 22
146–147 20
148–149 12
150–151 16
152–153 24
154–155 23
156–157 15
158–159 15
160–161 11
162–163 17
164–165 12
166–167 11
168–169 9
170–171 9
172–173 11
174–175 4
176–177 8
178–179 5
180–181 3
182–183 4
184 4
185+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Edward M. Cackett is affiliated with Wayne State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Physics and Astronomy with a focus on Astronomy and Astrophysics, as well as related subfields including Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Computational Mechanics, Biomedical Engineering, and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, notably Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations, Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena, Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research, Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, and Phenomena, Gamma-ray Bursts and Supernovae, Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation, and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies.

Their publication record includes contributions to multiple frequent venues such as:

  • The Astrophysical Journal
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific

Some examples of their recent papers are as follows:

  • Intensive disc-reverberation mapping of Fairall 9: first year of Swift and LCO monitoring, 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • Disk, Corona, Jet Connection in the Intermediate State of MAXI J1820+070 Revealed by NICER Spectral-timing Analysis, 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters
  • The soft state of the black hole transient source MAXI J1820+070: emission from the edge of the plunge region?, 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • On the multiwavelength variability of Mrk 110: two components acting at different time-scales, 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • The NICER "Reverberation Machine": A Systematic Study of Time Lags in Black Hole X-Ray Binaries, 2022, The Astrophysical Journal

Edward M. Cackett collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • K. Horne
  • J. M. Gelbord
  • M. R. Goad
  • Erin Kara
  • Aaron J. Barth

Best Publications

  • The Hot and Energetic Universe: A White Paper presenting the science theme motivating the Athena+ mission

    Kirpal Nandra;Didier Barret;Xavier Barcons;Andy Fabian

  • The quiescent intracluster medium in the core of the Perseus cluster

    Felix Aharonian;Felix Aharonian;Hiroki Akamatsu;Fumie Akimoto;Steven W. Allen

  • Space Telescope and Optical Reverberation Mapping Project. III. Optical Continuum Emission and Broad-Band Time Delays in NGC 5548

    M. M. Fausnaugh;K. D. Denney;A. J. Barth;M. C. Bentz

  • X-ray reverberation around accreting black holes

    P. Uttley;E. M. Cackett;A. C. Fabian;E. Kara

  • Testing thermal reprocessing in active galactic nuclei accretion discs

    Edward M. Cackett;Edward M. Cackett;Keith Horne;Hartmut Winkler

  • Discovery of a relation between black hole mass and soft X-ray time lags in active galactic nuclei

    B. De Marco;B. De Marco;B. De Marco;G. Ponti;M. Cappi;M. Dadina

  • Testing thermal reprocessing in AGN accretion discs

    E. M. Cackett;K. Horne;H. Winkler

  • The Large Observatory For X-ray Timing: LOFT

    M. Feroci;L. Stella;M. van der Klis;T. J.-L. Courvoisier

  • The corona contracts in a black-hole transient

    E. Kara;J. F. Steiner;A. C. Fabian;E. M. Cackett

  • A REVERBERATION-BASED MASS FOR THE CENTRAL BLACK HOLE IN NGC 4151

    Misty C. Bentz;Kelly D. Denney;Edward M. Cackett;Matthias Dietrich

  • Relativistic Lines and Reflection from the Inner Accretion Disks Around Neutron Stars

    E. M. Cackett;J. M. Miller;D. R. Ballantyne;D. Barret

  • A global look at X-ray time lags in seyfert galaxies

    E. Kara;W. N. Alston;A. C. Fabian;E. M. Cackett

  • The fundamental plane of accretion onto black holes with dynamical masses

    Kayhan Gültekin;Edward M. Cackett;Jon M. Miller;Tiziana Di Matteo

  • The Mass of the Black Hole in the Seyfert 1 Galaxy NGC 4593 from Reverberation Mapping

    Kelly D. Denney;Misty C. Bentz;Bradley M. Peterson;Richard W. Pogge

  • Relativistic Iron Emission Lines in Neutron Star Low-Mass X-Ray Binaries as Probes of Neutron Star Radii

    Edward M. Cackett;Jon M. Miller;Sudip Bhattacharyya;Sudip Bhattacharyya;Jonathan E. Grindlay

  • Relativistic iron K X-ray reverberation in NGC 4151

    A. Zoghbi;A. Zoghbi;A. C. Fabian;C. S. Reynolds;E. M. Cackett;E. M. Cackett

  • NGC 5548 in a Low-Luminosity State: Implications for the Broad-Line Region

    Misty C. Bentz;Kelly D. Denney;Edward M. Cackett;Edward M. Cackett;Matthias Dietrich

  • The First Swift Intensive AGN Accretion Disk Reverberation Mapping Survey

    R. Edelson;J. Gelbord;E. Cackett;B. M. Peterson;B. M. Peterson

  • RELATIVISTIC LINES AND REFLECTION FROM THE INNER ACCRETION DISKS AROUND NEUTRON STARS

    Edward M. Cackett;Jon M. Miller;David R. Ballantyne;Didier Barret

  • Modelling the broad Fe Kα reverberation in the AGN NGC 4151

    E. M. Cackett;A. Zoghbi;A. Zoghbi;C. Reynolds;C. Reynolds;A. C. Fabian

Frequent Co-Authors

Jon M. Miller
Jon M. Miller University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christopher S. Reynolds
Christopher S. Reynolds University of Cambridge
Jelle Kaastra
Jelle Kaastra Leiden University
Norbert Werner
Norbert Werner Masaryk University
Rudy Wijnands
Rudy Wijnands University of Amsterdam
Chris Done
Chris Done Durham University
Poshak Gandhi
Poshak Gandhi University of Southampton
Felix Aharonian
Felix Aharonian Dublin Institute For Advanced Studies
Roger Blandford
Roger Blandford Stanford University
Steven W. Allen
Steven W. Allen Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Edward M. Cackett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles