World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
5116
World Ranking
11719
National Ranking
1449

Dong Li publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dong Li sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 351 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Dong Li D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dong Li sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Ergodic Capacity of Intelligent Reflecting Surface-Assisted Communication Systems With Phase Errors

    Unknown

  • EERAID: energy efficient redundant and inexpensive disk array

    Dong Li;Jun Wang

  • Physical Layer Security of Cognitive Ambient Backscatter Communications for Green Internet-of-Things

    Xingwang Li;Yike Zheng;Wali Ullah Khan;Ming Zeng

  • A Novel Framework of Three-Hierarchical Offloading Optimization for MEC in Industrial IoT Networks

    Zichao Zhao;Rui Zhao;Junjuan Xia;Xianfu Lei

  • Dynamic Offloading for Multiuser Muti-CAP MEC Networks: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach

    Chao Li;Junjuan Xia;Fagui Liu;Dong Li

  • How Many Reflecting Elements Are Needed for Energy- and Spectral-Efficient Intelligent Reflecting Surface-Assisted Communication

    Unknown

  • Rethinking Sustainable Sensing in Agricultural Internet of Things: From Power Supply Perspective

    Unknown

  • Active RIS-Assisted Secure Transmission for Cognitive Satellite Terrestrial Networks

    Unknown

  • Pain Without Gain: Destructive Beamforming From a Malicious RIS Perspective in IoT Networks

    Unknown

  • Ultra-reliable MU-MIMO detector based on deep learning for 5G/B5G-enabled IoT

    Ke He;Zizhi Wang;Dong Li;Fusheng Zhu

  • On Superimposed Pilot for Channel Estimation in Multicell Multiuser MIMO Uplink: Large System Analysis

    Han Zhang;Shan Gao;Dong Li;Hongbin Chen

  • On Eavesdropping Attacks in Wireless Sensor Networks with Directional Antennas

    Hong-Ning Dai;Qiu Wang;Dong Li;Raymond Chi-Wing Wong

  • A mobility and load aware OLSR routing protocol for UAV mobile ad-hoc networks

    Unknown

  • Joint Computation Offloading and Radio Resource Allocation in MEC-Based Wireless-Powered Backscatter Communication Networks

    Yongjun Xu;Bowen Gu;Rose Qingyang Hu;Dong Li

  • Sidelobe suppression in NC-OFDM systems using constellation adjustment

    Unknown

  • Two Birds With One Stone: Exploiting Decode-and-Forward Relaying for Opportunistic Ambient Backscattering

    Unknown

  • Adaptive Ambient Backscatter Communication Systems With MRC

    Dong Li;Ying-Chang Liang

  • Energy-Efficient Maximization for RIS-Aided MISO Symbiotic Radio Systems

    Unknown

  • Performance Analysis of MRC Diversity for Cognitive Radio Systems

    Unknown

  • Hybrid Ambient Backscatter Communication Systems With Harvest-Then-Transmit Protocols

    Dong Li;Wei Peng;Ying-Chang Liang

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below: