World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
8510
World Ranking
11029
National Ranking
94

Dirk Tiede publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dirk Tiede sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 200 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Dirk Tiede D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dirk Tiede sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dirk Tiede is affiliated with the University of Salzburg in Austria and has contributed extensively to research at the intersection of environmental science, computer science, and engineering. Their work spans several subfields, including media technology, artificial intelligence, computer vision and pattern recognition, environmental engineering, and ecology.

Their research topics concentrate mainly on remote sensing technologies, with a particular focus on remote-sensing image classification, remote sensing and LiDAR applications, remote sensing in agriculture, geographic information systems studies, advanced computational techniques and applications, automated road and building extraction, and advanced neural network applications.

Dirk Tiede has published in multiple well-known scientific venues, showing a pattern of involvement in journals and forums specializing in geospatial and environmental data. Frequent publication venues include Remote Sensing, GI_Forum, Big Earth Data, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and the European Journal of Remote Sensing.

Selected recent papers by Dirk Tiede encompass:

  • Mask R-CNN-based building extraction from VHR satellite data in operational humanitarian action: An example related to Covid-19 response in Khartoum, Sudan, 2021, Transactions in GIS
  • Think global, cube local: an Earth Observation Data Cube's contribution to the Digital Earth vision, 2022, Big Earth Data
  • CloudSEN12, a global dataset for semantic understanding of cloud and cloud shadow in Sentinel-2, 2022, Scientific Data
  • UAV-Based Forest Health Monitoring: A Systematic Review, 2022, Remote Sensing
  • Transferable instance segmentation of dwellings in a refugee camp - integrating CNN and OBIA, 2020, European Journal of Remote Sensing

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Dirk Tiede's research, frequently working with several coauthors, most notably Martin Sudmanns, Stefan Lang, Hannah Augustin, L. Wendt, and Andrea Baraldi.

Best Publications

  • Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis - Towards a new paradigm.

    Thomas Blaschke;Geoffrey J. Hay;Maggi Kelly;Stefan Lang

  • ESP: a tool to estimate scale parameter for multiresolution image segmentation of remotely sensed data

    Lucian Drǎguţ;Dirk Tiede;Shaun R. Levick

  • Evaluation of Different Machine Learning Methods and Deep-Learning Convolutional Neural Networks for Landslide Detection

    Omid Ghorbanzadeh;Thomas Blaschke;Khalil Gholamnia;Sansar Raj Meena

  • Automated parameterisation for multi-scale image segmentation on multiple layers.

    L. Drăguţ;O. Csillik;C. Eisank;D. Tiede

  • Evaluation of Feature Selection Methods for Object-Based Land Cover Mapping of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Imagery Using Random Forest and Support Vector Machine Classifiers

    Lei Ma;Lei Ma;Tengyu Fu;Thomas Blaschke;Manchun Li

  • A systematic comparison of different object-based classification techniques using high spatial resolution imagery in agricultural environments

    Manchun Li;Lei Ma;Lei Ma;Thomas Blaschke;Liang Cheng

  • Big Earth data: disruptive changes in Earth observation data management and analysis?

    Martin Sudmanns;Dirk Tiede;Stefan Lang;Helena Bergstedt

  • Evaluation of different machine learning algorithms for scalable classification of tree types and tree species based on Sentinel-2 data.

    Mathias Wessel;Melanie Brandmeier;Dirk Tiede

  • Integrated assessment of the environmental impact of an IDP camp in Sudan based on very high resolution multi-temporal satellite imagery

    Michael Hagenlocher;Stefan Lang;Dirk Tiede

  • A FULL GIS-BASED WORKFLOW FOR TREE IDENTIFICATION AND TREE CROWN DELINEATION USING LASER SCANNING

    Dirk Tiede;Gregor Hochleitner;Thomas Blaschke

  • Building Extraction from Airborne Laser Scanning Data: An Analysis of the State of the Art

    Ivan Tomljenovic;Bernhard Höfle;Dirk Tiede;Thomas Blaschke

  • Assessing global Sentinel-2 coverage dynamics and data availability for operational Earth observation (EO) applications using the EO-Compass

    Martin Sudmanns;Dirk Tiede;Hannah Augustin;Stefan Lang

  • Earth observation (EO)-based ex post assessment of internally displaced person (IDP) camp evolution and population dynamics in Zam Zam, Darfur

    Stefan Lang;Dirk Tiede;Daniel Holbling;Petra Fureder

  • Object-Based Change Detection in Urban Areas: The Effects of Segmentation Strategy, Scale, and Feature Space on Unsupervised Methods

    Lei Ma;Manchun Li;Thomas Blaschke;Xiaoxue Ma

  • Object-based Class Modeling for Cadastre-constrained Delineation of Geo-objects

    Dirk Tiede;Stefan Lang;Florian Thomas Albrecht;Daniel Hölbling

  • Detection of Gully-Affected Areas by Applying Object-Based Image Analysis (OBIA) in the Region of Taroudannt, Morocco

    Sebastian d'Oleire-Oltmanns;Irene Marzolff;Dirk Tiede;Thomas Blaschke

  • Evaluating fuzzy operators of an object-based image analysis for detecting landslides and their changes

    Bakhtiar Feizizadeh;Thomas Blaschke;Dirk Tiede;Mohammad Hossein Rezaei Moghaddam

  • Exploring semantic elements for urban scene recognition: Deep integration of high-resolution imagery and OpenStreetMap (OSM)

    Wenzhi Zhao;Yanchen Bo;Jiage Chen;Dirk Tiede

  • Automatic Geographic Object Based Mapping of Streambed and Riparian Zone Extent from LiDAR Data in a Temperate Rural Urban Environment, Australia

    Kasper Johansen;Dirk Tiede;Thomas Blaschke;Lara A. Arroyo

  • Automated Damage Indication for Rapid Geospatial Reporting

    Dirk Tiede;Stefan Lang;Petra Füreder;Daniel Hölbling

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Blaschke
Thomas Blaschke University of Salzburg
Alistair B.A. Boxall
Alistair B.A. Boxall University of York
Omid Ghorbanzadeh
Omid Ghorbanzadeh University of Salzburg
Kasper Johansen
Kasper Johansen King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Geoffrey J. Hay
Geoffrey J. Hay University of Calgary
Bernhard Höfle
Bernhard Höfle Heidelberg University
Stuart R. Phinn
Stuart R. Phinn University of Queensland
William J. Emery
William J. Emery University of Colorado Boulder
Thilo Hofmann
Thilo Hofmann University of Vienna
Hannes Taubenböck
Hannes Taubenböck German Aerospace Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online computer science degrees in the USA opens up many accessible and flexible opportunities. Students concerned about cost can benefit from enrolling at one of the most affordable online colleges, ensuring quality education without a high financial burden.

Admissions requirements are another key factor to consider. Some institutions make online learning more inclusive, with several online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa or similar, giving students with lower GPAs the chance to pursue a degree and change their career trajectory.

For those seeking to enter the workforce faster, there are fastest computer science degree options that allow you to earn your qualification in less time. This can be especially valuable for career changers or professionals seeking quick advancement.

Finally, graduates in computer science can explore a wide array of related job markets, much like students asking, what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree? Both fields offer roles in research, technology, and interdisciplinary industries, expanding your career possibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Dirk Tiede

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles