World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Danilo Marchesini

Danilo Marchesini

D-Index & Metrics

Physics

D-Index
83
Citations
25986
World Ranking
2775
National Ranking
1365

Danilo Marchesini publication distribution in Physics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Physics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danilo Marchesini sits on this spectrum.

103–122 publications: 7 scientists 123–142 publications: 10 scientists 143–162 publications: 31 scientists 163–182 publications: 35 scientists 183–202 publications: 53 scientists 203–222 publications: 81 scientists 223–242 publications: 85 scientists 243–262 publications: 112 scientists 263–282 publications: 114 scientists 283–302 publications: 126 scientists 303–322 publications: 136 scientists 323–342 publications: 162 scientists 343–362 publications: 155 scientists 363–382 publications: 156 scientists 383–402 publications: 134 scientists 403–422 publications: 145 scientists 423–442 publications: 147 scientists 443–462 publications: 131 scientists 463–482 publications: 131 scientists 483–502 publications: 116 scientists 503–522 publications: 106 scientists 523–542 publications: 103 scientists 543–562 publications: 87 scientists 563–582 publications: 84 scientists 583–602 publications: 94 scientists 603–622 publications: 70 scientists 623–642 publications: 76 scientists 643–662 publications: 60 scientists 663–682 publications: 54 scientists 683–702 publications: 60 scientists 703–722 publications: 48 scientists 723–742 publications: 64 scientists 743–762 publications: 48 scientists 763–782 publications: 37 scientists 783–802 publications: 43 scientists 803–822 publications: 34 scientists 823–842 publications: 36 scientists 843–862 publications: 32 scientists 863–882 publications: 32 scientists 883–902 publications: 31 scientists 903–922 publications: 25 scientists 923–942 publications: 15 scientists 943–962 publications: 24 scientists 963–982 publications: 13 scientists 983–1,002 publications: 21 scientists 1,003–1,022 publications: 21 scientists 1,023–1,042 publications: 16 scientists 1,043–1,062 publications: 9 scientists 1,063–1,082 publications: 19 scientists 1,083–1,102 publications: 11 scientists 1,103–1,122 publications: 17 scientists 1,123–1,142 publications: 11 scientists 1,143–1,162 publications: 7 scientists 1,163–1,182 publications: 4 scientists 1,183–1,202 publications: 10 scientists 1,203–1,222 publications: 8 scientists 1,223–1,242 publications: 16 scientists 1,243–1,262 publications: 4 scientists 1,263–1,282 publications: 10 scientists 1,283–1,302 publications: 5 scientists 1,303–1,322 publications: 7 scientists 1,323–1,342 publications: 4 scientists 1,343–1,362 publications: 8 scientists 1,363–1,382 publications: 6 scientists 1,383–1,402 publications: 7 scientists 1,403–1,422 publications: 3 scientists 1,423–1,442 publications: 4 scientists 1,443–1,462 publications: 4 scientists 1,463–1,468 publications: 3 scientists 1,469+ publications: 100 scientists
103 publications 1,469+

This scientist: 264 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,469 publications or more.

Danilo Marchesini D-index placement in Physics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Physics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danilo Marchesini sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 76 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 110 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 143 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 153 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 144 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 167 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 167 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 166 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 132 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 155 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 134 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 137 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 102 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 112 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 110 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 116 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 97 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 103 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 87 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 90 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 78 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 75 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 67 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 69 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 59 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 53 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 42 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 41 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 33 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 32 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 45 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 19 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 24 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 28 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 31 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 20 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 12 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 24 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 23 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 15 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 15 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 11 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 17 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 12 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 11 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 9 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 9 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 11 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 4 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 8 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 5 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 3 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 4 scientists 184 D-Index: 4 scientists 185+ D-Index: 99 scientists
70 D-Index 185+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 185 D-Index or more.

Overview

Danilo Marchesini is affiliated with Tufts University in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Physics and Astronomy, with a strong focus on subfields such as Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, Computational Mechanics, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

Their work covers a range of topics including Astronomy and Astrophysical Research, Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena, Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies, Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae, Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations, Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies, and Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing.

Danilo Marchesini has frequently published in several venues, reflecting a concentration in astronomy-oriented journals and archives. Key publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Astrophysical Journal
  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics

Several notable papers by Marchesini illustrate their contributions and the scope of their studies:

  • UNCOVER Spectroscopy Confirms the Surprising Ubiquity of Active Galactic Nuclei in Red Sources at z > 5, 2024, The Astrophysical Journal
  • The GLASS-JWST Early Release Science Program. I. Survey Design and Release Plans, 2022, The Astrophysical Journal
  • UNCOVER: A NIRSpec Identification of a Broad-line AGN at z = 8.50, 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters
  • UNCOVER: The Growth of the First Massive Black Holes from JWST/NIRSpec-Spectroscopic Redshift Confirmation of an X-Ray Luminous AGN at z = 10.1, 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters
  • The JWST FRESCO survey: legacy NIRCam/grism spectroscopy and imaging in the two GOODS fields, 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Collaboration plays a significant role in Marchesini's research output, with frequent co-authors including Gabriel Brammer, Katherine E. Whitaker, Karl Glazebrook, Adam Muzzin, and Ivo Labbé.

Best Publications

  • An ultra-deep near-infrared spectrum of a compact quiescent galaxy at z=2.2

    Mariska Kriek;Pieter G. van Dokkum;Ivo Labbé;Marijn Franx

  • The Growth of Massive Galaxies Since z = 2

    Pieter G. van Dokkum;Pieter G. van Dokkum;Katherine E. Whitaker;Katherine E. Whitaker;Gabriel Brammer;Gabriel Brammer;Marijn Franx

  • Confirmation of the Remarkable Compactness of Massive Quiescent Galaxies at z ~ 2.3: Early-Type Galaxies Did not Form in a Simple Monolithic Collapse* **

    Pieter G. van Dokkum;Marijn Franx;Mariska Kriek;Bradford Holden

  • THE EVOLUTION OF THE STELLAR MASS FUNCTIONS OF STAR-FORMING AND QUIESCENT GALAXIES TO z = 4 FROM THE COSMOS/UltraVISTA SURVEY*

    Adam Muzzin;Danilo Marchesini;Mauro Stefanon;Marijn Franx

  • 3D-HST WFC3-selected Photometric Catalogs in the Five CANDELS/3D-HST Fields: Photometry, Photometric Redshifts, and Stellar Masses

    Rosalind E. Skelton;Katherine E. Whitaker;Ivelina G. Momcheva;Gabriel B. Brammer

  • The 3D-HST Survey: Hubble Space Telescope WFC3/G141 grism spectra, redshifts, and emission line measurements for $\sim 100,000$ galaxies

    Ivelina G. Momcheva;Gabriel B. Brammer;Pieter G. van Dokkum;Rosalind E. Skelton

  • 3D-HST: a wide-field grism spectroscopic survey with the Hubble Space Telescope

    Gabriel B. Brammer;Pieter G. Van Dokkum;Marijn Franx;Mattia Fumagalli

  • THE EVOLUTION OF THE STELLAR MASS FUNCTION OF GALAXIES FROM z = 4.0 AND THE FIRST COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF ITS UNCERTAINTIES: EVIDENCE FOR MASS-DEPENDENT EVOLUTION*

    Danilo Marchesini;Pieter G. van Dokkum;Natascha M. Förster Schreiber;Marijn Franx

  • A Public Ks-selected Catalog in the COSMOS/UltraVISTA Field: Photometry, Photometric Redshifts and Stellar Population Parameters

    Adam Muzzin;Danilo Marchesini;Mauro Stefanon;Marijn Franx

  • A PUBLIC K-s-SELECTED CATALOG IN THE COSMOS/ULTRAVISTA FIELD: PHOTOMETRY, PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFTS, AND STELLAR POPULATION PARAMETERS

    Adam Muzzin;Danilo Marchesini;Mauro Stefanon;Marijn Franx

  • The number density and mass density of star-forming and quiescent galaxies at 0.4 < z < 2.2

    Gabriel B. Brammer;Katherine E. Whitaker;Pieter G. van Dokkum;Danilo Marchesini

  • Ly-alpha Emission-Line Galaxies at z = 3.1 in the Extended Chandra Deep Field South

    C. Gronwall;R. Ciardullo;T. Hickey;E. Gawaiser

  • THE RELATION BETWEEN COMPACT, QUIESCENT HIGH-REDSHIFT GALAXIES AND MASSIVE NEARBY ELLIPTICAL GALAXIES: EVIDENCE FOR HIERARCHICAL, INSIDE-OUT GROWTH

    Rachel Bezanson;Pieter G. van Dokkum;Tomer Tal;Danilo Marchesini

  • THE 3D-HST SURVEY: HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE WFC3/G141 GRISM SPECTRA, REDSHIFTS, AND EMISSION LINE MEASUREMENTS FOR ∼100,000 GALAXIES

    Ivelina G. Momcheva;Gabriel B. Brammer;Pieter G. Van Dokkum;Rosalind E. Skelton

  • THE NEWFIRM MEDIUM-BAND SURVEY: PHOTOMETRIC CATALOGS, REDSHIFTS, AND THE BIMODAL COLOR DISTRIBUTION OF GALAXIES OUT TO z ∼ 3

    Katherine E. Whitaker;Katherine E. Whitaker;Ivo Labbé;Ivo Labbé;Pieter G. van Dokkum;Pieter G. van Dokkum;Gabriel Brammer;Gabriel Brammer;Gabriel Brammer

  • Lyα Emission-Line Galaxies at z = 3.1 in the Extended Chandra Deep Field-South

    Caryl Gronwall;Robin Ciardullo;Thomas Hickey;Eric Gawiser

  • THE NUMBER DENSITY AND MASS DENSITY OF STAR-FORMING AND QUIESCENT GALAXIES AT 0.4 ⩽ z ⩽ 2.2

    Gabriel B. Brammer;Gabriel B. Brammer;Gabriel B. Brammer;K. E. Whitaker;P. G. van Dokkum;D. Marchesini

  • THE DEAD SEQUENCE: A CLEAR BIMODALITY IN GALAXY COLORS FROM z = 0 to z = 2.5

    G. B. Brammer;K. E. Whitaker;P. G. van Dokkum;D. Marchesini;D. Marchesini

  • Spectroscopic Identification of Massive Galaxies at z ~ 2.3 with Strongly Suppressed Star Formation*

    Mariska Kriek;Pieter G. van Dokkum;Marijn Franx;Ryan Quadri

  • HST/WFC3 Confirmation of the Inside-out Growth of Massive Galaxies at 0 < z < 2 and Identification of Their Star-forming Progenitors at z ~ 3

    Shannon G. Patel;Pieter G. van Dokkum;Marijn Franx;Ryan F. Quadri

Frequent Co-Authors

Gabriel B. Brammer
Gabriel B. Brammer University of Copenhagen
Mariska Kriek
Mariska Kriek University of California, Berkeley
Pieter G. van Dokkum
Pieter G. van Dokkum Yale University
Ivo Labbe
Ivo Labbe Swinburne University of Technology
David A. Wake
David A. Wake The Open University
Marijn Franx
Marijn Franx Leiden University
Eric Gawiser
Eric Gawiser Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Garth D. Illingworth
Garth D. Illingworth University of California, Santa Cruz
Bo Milvang-Jensen
Bo Milvang-Jensen University of Copenhagen
Pascal Oesch
Pascal Oesch University of Geneva

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Danilo Marchesini

Trending Scientists