World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 54 12789 11507 3384 2765 117 8740

Carsten Sievers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Carsten Sievers between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Carsten Sievers published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 7.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2023. 20 of the 172 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2023. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 19 publications 2026: 1 publication
2004 2026

172 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Carsten Sievers: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 4
2006 6
2007 6
2008 4
2009 3
2010 1
2011 2
2012 5
2013 5
2014 7
2015 6
2016 4
2017 11
2018 11
2019 10
2020 9
2021 10
2022 6
2023 20
2024 20
2025 19
2026 1
Total 172
Download as CSV

Carsten Sievers publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carsten Sievers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 117 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623 117
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Carsten Sievers D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carsten Sievers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933 54
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Carsten Sievers is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research primarily encompasses the fields of engineering and materials science, with a significant focus on several subfields including mechanical engineering, materials chemistry, catalysis, biomedical engineering, and inorganic chemistry.

Their work covers a broad array of topics related to catalytic processes and materials science. The main topics addressed in Sievers's research include:

  • Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
  • Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
  • Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
  • Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
  • Catalysts for Methane Reforming
  • Polymer crystallization and properties

Sievers has published numerous papers in several academic journals. Some of their recent publications include:

  • "Nickel Speciation and Methane Dry Reforming Performance of Ni/CexZr1-xO2 Prepared by Different Synthesis Methods," 2020, ACS Catalysis
  • "Insights into the Oxidative Degradation Mechanism of Solid Amine Sorbents for CO 2 Capture from Air: Roles of Atmospheric Water," 2023, Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • "Mechanocatalytic Ammonia Synthesis over TiN in Transient Microenvironments," 2020, ACS Energy Letters
  • "Stages and Kinetics of Mechanochemical Depolymerization of Poly(ethylene terephthalate) with Sodium Hydroxide," 2022, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
  • "Leveraging mechanochemistry for sustainable polymer degradation," 2024, Polymer Journal

Frequently publishing in prominent journals, Sievers has a notable number of contributions in:

  • ACS Catalysis
  • ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
  • Journal of Catalysis
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Collaborations are a significant aspect of their research activities. Some of Sievers's frequent coauthors include:

  • Marta C. Hatzell
  • Karoline L. Hebisch
  • Giada Innocenti
  • Sankar Nair
  • Bryan J. Hare

Best Publications

  • Stability of Zeolites in Hot Liquid Water

    Ryan M. Ravenelle;Florian Schüβler;Andrew D’Amico;Nadiya Danilina

  • Structural Changes of γ-Al2O3-Supported Catalysts in Hot Liquid Water

    Ryan M. Ravenelle;John R. Copeland;Wun-Gwi Kim;John C. Crittenden

  • Acid‐Catalyzed Conversion of Sugars and Furfurals in an Ionic‐Liquid Phase

    Carsten Sievers;Ildar Musin;Teresita Marzialetti;Mariefel B. Valenzuela Olarte

  • Phenomena Affecting Catalytic Reactions at Solid–Liquid Interfaces

    Carsten Sievers;Yu Noda;Long Qi;Elise M. Albuquerque;Elise M. Albuquerque

  • Effect of Amine Surface Coverage on the Co-Adsorption of CO2 and Water: Spectral Deconvolution of Adsorbed Species

    Stephanie A. Didas;Miles A. Sakwa-Novak;Guo Shiou Foo;Carsten Sievers

  • Dramatic enhancement of CO2 uptake by poly(ethyleneimine) using zirconosilicate supports.

    Yasutaka Kuwahara;Dun Yen Kang;John R. Copeland;Nicholas A. Brunelli

  • CATALYTIC ACTIVITY OF BRONSTED ACID SITES IN ZEOLITES: INTRINSIC ACTIVITY, RATE-LIMITING STEP, AND INFLUENCE OF THE LOCAL STRUCTURE OF THE ACID SITES

    Bin Xu;Carsten Sievers;Suk Bong Hong;Roel Prins

  • Dilute Acid Hydrolysis of Loblolly Pine: A Comprehensive Approach

    Teresita Marzialetti;Mariefel B. Valenzuela Olarte;Carsten Sievers;Travis J. C. Hoskins

  • Role of Lewis and Brønsted Acid Sites in the Dehydration of Glycerol over Niobia

    Guo Shiou Foo;Daniel Wei;David S. Sholl;Carsten Sievers

  • Elucidation of Surface Species through in Situ FTIR Spectroscopy of Carbon Dioxide Adsorption on Amine-Grafted SBA-15.

    Guo Shiou Foo;Jason J. Lee;Chia-Hsin Chen;Sophia E. Hayes

  • Ionic-Liquid-Phase Hydrolysis of Pine Wood

    Carsten Sievers;Mariefel B. Valenzuela-Olarte;Teresita Marzialetti;Ildar Musin

  • Differences in the Nature of Active Sites for Methane Dry Reforming and Methane Steam Reforming over Nickel Aluminate Catalysts

    Jessica L. Rogers;Jessica L. Rogers;Michael C. Mangarella;Andrew D. D’Amico;James R. Gallagher

  • Effect of preparation methods on the performance of Co/Al2O3 catalysts for dry reforming of methane

    Jessica L. Ewbank;Libor Kovarik;Christian C. Kenvin;Carsten Sievers

  • Important Roles of Enthalpic and Entropic Contributions to CO2 Capture from Simulated Flue Gas and Ambient Air Using Mesoporous Silica Grafted Amines

    Mustafa A. Alkhabbaz;Praveen Bollini;Guo Shiou Foo;Carsten Sievers

  • Novel ruthenium-based metathesis catalysts containing electron-withdrawing ligands: synthesis, immobilization, and reactivity.

    Tobias S. Halbach;Stefan Mix;Dirk Fischer;Simon Maechling

  • Generation and Characterization of Well-Defined Zn2+ Lewis Acid Sites in Ion Exchanged Zeolite BEA

    Jochen Penzien;Anuji Abraham;Jeroen A. Van Bokhoven;Andreas Jentys

  • Effect of metal–support interactions in Ni/Al2O3 catalysts with low metal loading for methane dry reforming

    Jessica L. Ewbank;Libor Kovarik;Fatoumata Z. Diallo;Carsten Sievers

  • Propane dehydrogenation catalyzed by gallosilicate MFI zeolites with perturbed acidity

    Seung-Won Choi;Wun-Gwi Kim;Jung-Seob So;Jason S. Moore

  • Hydrodeoxygenation of Guaiacol over Ceria–Zirconia Catalysts

    Sarah M. Schimming;Onaje D. LaMont;Michael König;Michael König;Allyson K. Rogers;Allyson K. Rogers

  • Enhanced CO2 Adsorption over Polymeric Amines Supported on Heteroatom‐Incorporated SBA‐15 Silica: Impact of Heteroatom Type and Loading on Sorbent Structure and Adsorption Performance

    Yasutaka Kuwahara;Yasutaka Kuwahara;Dun Yen Kang;John R. Copeland;Praveen Bollini

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher W. Jones
Christopher W. Jones Georgia Institute of Technology
Johannes A. Lercher
Johannes A. Lercher Technical University of Munich
Eli Stavitski
Eli Stavitski Brookhaven National Laboratory
David S. Sholl
David S. Sholl Georgia Institute of Technology
Thomas Müller
Thomas Müller Ruhr University Bochum
Libor Kovarik
Libor Kovarik Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
J. Will Medlin
J. Will Medlin University of Colorado Boulder
John C. Crittenden
John C. Crittenden Georgia Institute of Technology
Sankar Nair
Sankar Nair Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens the door to numerous career paths, many of which require specialized education and training. For those interested in legal support roles, exploring what types of paralegals make the most money can provide valuable insights into how chemistry knowledge may complement careers in patent law or environmental regulations.

The pharmaceutical industry offers lucrative opportunities for chemistry graduates. For example, a role as a pharmaceutical sales representative is both dynamic and rewarding. Understanding the pharmaceutical sales salary and career paths helps students align their studies with industry expectations and growth potential.

For those aiming for clinical roles, becoming a pharmacist requires significant commitment. Reviewing how much schooling to be a pharmacist highlights the educational requirements and long-term career benefits, often making it a worthwhile pursuit.

Another specialized field linked to Chemistry is forensic science. Learning about careers such as an autopsy technician can broaden your perspective on how science supports legal and medical investigations. The resource on autopsy technician education, salary, and job outlook provides crucial information for those intrigued by forensic applications.

Best Scientists Citing Carsten Sievers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles