World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
66
Citations
49317
World Ranking
2635
National Ranking
1513

Bruce N. Cuthbert publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce N. Cuthbert sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 129 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Bruce N. Cuthbert D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce N. Cuthbert sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruce N. Cuthbert is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with significant contributions in experimental and cognitive psychology, biological psychiatry, psychiatry and mental health, molecular biology, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's recent scholarly output encompasses several topics including mental health research, tryptophan and brain disorders, schizophrenia research and treatment, congenital heart defects research, functional brain connectivity studies, stress responses and cortisol, and broader mental health and psychiatry themes.

Key recent papers authored by this scientist include:

  • Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): Progress and Potential, 2022, Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • The role of RDoC in future classification of mental disorders, 2020, Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience
  • Evolving Concepts of the Schizophrenia Spectrum: A Research Domain Criteria Perspective, 2021, Frontiers in Psychiatry

Other influential papers related to the field but not authored solely by Cuthbert include "Revisiting the seven pillars of RDoC" (2022, BMC Medicine) and "Development and environment in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Research Domain Criteria" (2022, Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science).

The scientist frequently collaborates with several other researchers. Notable frequent coauthors are Nicholas Massa, Erica Duncan, Opal Ousley, Elaine F. Walker, and Joseph F. Cubells.

Bruce N. Cuthbert has published repeatedly in several prominent venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • BMC Medicine
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders

    Thomas R Insel;Bruce N. Cuthbert;Marjorie A. Garvey;Robert K. Heinssen

  • Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC

    Bruce N Cuthbert;Thomas R Insel

  • Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex.

    Peter J. Lang;Margaret M. Bradley;Bruce N. Cuthbert

  • Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing.

    Margaret M. Bradley;Maurizio Codispoti;Bruce N. Cuthbert;Peter J. Lang

  • Brain potentials in affective picture processing: Covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report

    Bruce N. Cuthbert;Harald Thomas Schupp;Margaret M. Bradley;Niels Birbaumer

  • Motivated attention : affect, activation, and action

    Peter J. Lang;Margaret M. Bradley;Bruce N. Cuthbert

  • Affective picture processing : The late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance

    Harald Thomas Schupp;Bruce N. Cuthbert;Margaret M. Bradley;John T. Cacioppo

  • The RDoC framework: facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology.

    Bruce N. Cuthbert

  • Committee report: Guidelines for human startle eyeblink electromyographic studies.

    Terry D. Blumenthal;Bruce N. Cuthbert;Diane L. Filion;Steven Hackley

  • Emotion, motivation, and anxiety: brain mechanisms and psychophysiology

    Peter J. Lang;Margaret M. Bradley;Bruce N. Cuthbert

  • Emotional arousal and activation of the visual cortex: An fMRI analysis

    Peter J. Lang;Margaret M. Bradley;Jeffrey R. Fitzsimmons;Bruce N. Cuthbert

  • Brain disorders? Precisely

    Thomas R. Insel;Bruce N. Cuthbert

  • Developing constructs for psychopathology research: research domain criteria.

    Charles A. Sanislow;Daniel S. Pine;Kevin J. Quinn;Michael J. Kozak

  • Reenvisioning Clinical Science: Unifying the Discipline to Improve the Public Health

    Lisa S. Onken;Kathleen M. Carroll;Varda Shoham;Bruce N. Cuthbert

  • Research Domain Criteria: cognitive systems, neural circuits, and dimensions of behavior.

    Sarah E Morris;Bruce N Cuthbert

  • The NIMH Research Domain Criteria Initiative: Background, Issues, and Pragmatics.

    Michael J. Kozak;Bruce N. Cuthbert

  • Three Approaches to Understanding and Classifying Mental Disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC):

    Lee Anna Clark;Bruce Cuthbert;Roberto Lewis-Fernández;William E. Narrow

  • Brain processes in emotional perception: Motivated attention

    Harald Thomas Schupp;Harald Thomas Schupp;Bruce N. Cuthbert;Bruce N. Cuthbert;Margaret M. Bradley;Charles H. Hillman

  • Probing picture perception : Activation and emotion

    Bruce N. Cuthbert;Margaret M. Bradley;Peter J. Lang

  • Emotion in the criminal psychopath: Fear image processing.

    Christopher J. Patrick;Bruce N. Cuthbert;Peter J. Lang

  • Startle Reflex Modification: Emotion or Attention?

    Margaret M. Bradley;Bruce N. Cuthbert;Peter J. Lang

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Lang
Peter Lang University of Bern
Margaret M. Bradley
Margaret M. Bradley University of Florida
Thomas R. Insel
Thomas R. Insel National Institutes of Health
Harald T. Schupp
Harald T. Schupp University of Konstanz
Robert Heinssen
Robert Heinssen National Institutes of Health
Alfons O. Hamm
Alfons O. Hamm University of Greifswald
Charles H. Hillman
Charles H. Hillman Northeastern University
Christopher J. Patrick
Christopher J. Patrick Florida State University
Scott R. Vrana
Scott R. Vrana Virginia Commonwealth University
Daniel W. McNeil
Daniel W. McNeil West Virginia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in expanding your psychology studies, several related online degrees can open doors to rewarding careers. Social work is one of the most popular pathways for psychology graduates, offering opportunities to support individuals and communities. However, requirements to become a social worker vary by state.

For those considering a career in North Dakota, be sure to review the social worker degree requirements in North Dakota. If you’re in Ohio, check the Ohio education requirements for social workers. Each state has specific guidelines regarding the necessary qualifications and licensure.

Similarly, aspiring social workers in Oklahoma should familiarize themselves with Oklahoma education requirements for social workers. In Oregon, learning about the social worker degree requirements in Oregon can guide you in choosing the right degree or certification. Understanding these differences is essential when planning your educational journey and future career in psychology or social work.

Best Scientists Citing Bruce N. Cuthbert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles