World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
31
Citations
3754
World Ranking
3357
National Ranking
205

Björn Schmalfuss publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Björn Schmalfuss sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 108 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Björn Schmalfuss D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Björn Schmalfuss sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Random attractors for the 3D stochastic Navier-Stokes equation with multiplicative white noise

    Franco Flandoli;Björn Schmalfuss

  • Invariant manifolds for stochastic partial differential equations

    Jinqiao Duan;Kening Lu;Björn Schmalfuss

  • Nonautonomous systems, cocycle attractors and variable time-step discretization

    Peter E. Kloeden;Björn Schmalfuß

  • Non--autonomous and random attractors for delay random semilinear equations without uniqueness

    Tomás Caraballo;M. J. Garrido-Atienza;B. Schmalfuss;José Valero

  • The Conjugacy of Stochastic and Random Differential Equations and the Existence of Global Attractors

    Peter Imkeller;Björn Schmalfuss

  • Asymptotic behaviour of a stochastic semilinear dissipative functional equation without uniqueness of solutions

    Tomás Caraballo;María J. Garrido–Atienza;Björn Schmalfuss;José Valero

  • Asymptotic behaviour of nonautonomous difference inclusions

    Peter E. Kloeden;Björn Schmalfuss

  • A Random Fixed Point Theorem and the Random Graph Transformation

    Björn Schmalfuss

  • Random Dynamical Systems and Stationary Solutions of Differential Equations Driven by the Fractional Brownian Motion

    Unknown

  • Weak Solutions and Attractors for Three-Dimensional Navier–Stokes Equations with Nonregular Force

    Franco Flandoli;Björn Schmalfuß

  • Invariant manifolds for stochastic wave equations

    Kening Lu;Björn Schmalfuß

  • Pathwise solutions of SPDEs driven by Hölder-continuous integrators with exponent larger than $1/2$ and random dynamical systems

    Yong Chen;Hongjun Gao;María José Garrido Atienza;Björn Schmalfuss

  • Ergodicity of the Infinite Dimensional Fractional Brownian Motion

    Unknown

  • Random dynamical systems for stochastic partial differentialequations driven by a fractional Brownian motion

    María J. Garrido–Atienza;Kening Lu;Björn Schmalfuss

  • The 3D Quasigeostrophic Fluid Dynamics Under Random Forcing On Boundary

    Jinqiao Duan;Bjorn Schmalfuss

  • Pullback Attractors in Dissipative Nonautonomous Differential Equations Under Discretization

    D. N. Cheban;P. E. Kloeden;B. Schmalfuß

  • Lyapunov's Second Method for Random Dynamical Systems

    Unknown

  • RANDOM ATTRACTORS FOR STOCHASTIC EQUATIONS DRIVEN BY A FRACTIONAL BROWNIAN MOTION

    Unknown

  • Random attractors for stochastic lattice dynamical systems with infinite multiplicative white noise

    Tomás Caraballo;Xiaoying Han;Björn Schmalfuss;José Valero

  • Random Attractors for Stochastic Evolution Equations Driven by Fractional Brownian Motion

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Kening Lu
Kening Lu Brigham Young University
Jinqiao Duan
Jinqiao Duan Great Bay University
Tomás Caraballo
Tomás Caraballo University of Seville
Igor Chueshov
Igor Chueshov V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University
Peter E. Kloeden
Peter E. Kloeden University of Tübingen
José Valero
José Valero Miguel Hernandez University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, often enhanced by complementary online degrees. For those interested in finance, pursuing an online masters in finance can be a strategic step, combining strong quantitative skills with financial expertise to boost employability in banking and investment sectors.

Alternatively, students aiming for leadership roles may consider MBA programs. Several fastest MBA programs online offer flexible, accelerated tracks that allow math graduates to gain business acumen without committing to lengthy study periods. This approach speeds up career advancement in management and consulting.

Marketing is another promising field where analytical skills are prized. The cheapest online marketing degree programs provide affordable routes to develop expertise in digital marketing, market analytics, and consumer behavior — all areas where mathematical insight adds value.

For those seeking an even more intensive business education, the 1 year MBA programs are highly effective for rapidly building leadership skills, often attracting math graduates eager to combine technical knowledge with advanced managerial training.

Best Scientists Citing Björn Schmalfuss

Recently Published Articles