World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Avery Fong

Avery Fong

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 32 13197 5293 122 4164

Avery Fong publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Avery Fong between 1997 and 2013, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Avery Fong published across 17 years, from 1997 to 2013, averaging 7.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2006. 2 of the 130 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2013. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2006. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 20 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 28 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication
1997 2013

130 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Avery Fong: publications per year, 1997 to 2013
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 2
2000 11
2001 5
2002 20
2003 14
2004 7
2005 12
2006 28
2007 13
2008 12
2009 3
2010 0
2011 0
2012 1
2013 1
Total 130
Download as CSV

Avery Fong publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Avery Fong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 122–131 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 122 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544 122
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Avery Fong D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Avery Fong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983 32
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Operating system
  • Computer network
  • Software

His primary areas of study are Database, Software, Computer network, Communications protocol and The Internet. His work deals with themes such as Schedule, Project planning, Data structure and Project manager, which intersect with Database. Avery Fong has included themes like Computer hardware, Touchpad, Real-time computing, User interface design and Workstation in his Software study.

Computer network is closely attributed to Computer program in his study. The various areas that he examines in his Computer program study include Graphical user interface, Transfer and Information retrieval. His study in Communications protocol is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Event and Shared resource.

His most cited work include:

  • Method and apparatus for providing a graphical user interface for creating and editing a mapping of a first structural description to a second structural description (155 citations)
  • Method and system of remote diagnostic, control and information collection using multiple formats and multiple protocols with delegating protocol processor (113 citations)
  • Method and system of remote position reporting device (106 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Computer program, Communications protocol, Database, Computer network and Computer hardware. His Computer program study incorporates themes from Web page, String and Hypertext Transfer Protocol. Avery Fong has researched Communications protocol in several fields, including Object, Identifier, Real-time computing and Control.

He interconnects Schedule, Task, Data structure and Web browser in the investigation of issues within Database. Many of his research projects under Computer network are closely connected to Information storage with Information storage, tying the diverse disciplines of science together. His Computer hardware research also works with subjects such as

  • Interface which is related to area like User interface and Class,
  • Embedded system, which have a strong connection to Interfacing.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Computer program (38.73%)
  • Communications protocol (33.80%)
  • Database (32.39%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2005-2013)?

  • Database (32.39%)
  • Communications protocol (33.80%)
  • Computer program (38.73%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Database, Communications protocol, Computer program, Computer network and Web page. His Database research includes elements of Schedule, Task, Data structure and Web browser. His Communications protocol study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Data file, Control, Object and Data processing.

His studies deal with areas such as Computer hardware and Hypertext Transfer Protocol as well as Computer program. His Computer hardware research incorporates themes from User interface design, User interface and Interface. His Computer network research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Reading and Association.

Between 2005 and 2013, his most popular works were:

  • Method and system of remote diagnostic, control and information collection using multiple formats and multiple protocols with verification of formats and protocols (105 citations)
  • Use of a database in a network-based project schedule management system (101 citations)
  • Application unit monitoring and reporting system and method (88 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Operating system
  • Computer network
  • Software

Avery Fong spends much of his time researching Database, Communications protocol, Computer program, Multiple data and Computer hardware. His studies in Database integrate themes in fields like World Wide Web, Computer network, Task and Data structure. In general Computer network study, his work on Service often relates to the realm of Monitoring system, thereby connecting several areas of interest.

His Computer program research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Simple Network Management Protocol, Protocol and State information. His Computer hardware research includes themes of User interface design, Workstation, Source code and Code. Avery Fong combines subjects such as Interface, Shared resource and File Transfer Protocol with his study of Control.

Best Publications

  • Method and apparatus for providing a graphical user interface for creating and editing a mapping of a first structural description to a second structural description

    Avery Fong;Tetsuro Motoyama;Anurag Bhatnagar

  • Method and system of remote diagnostic, control and information collection using multiple formats and multiple protocols with delegating protocol processor

    Tetsuro Motoyama;Avery Fong

  • Method and system of remote position reporting device

    Tetsuro Motoyama;Avery Fong

  • Method and system of remote diagnostic, control and information collection using multiple formats and multiple protocols with verification of formats and protocols

    Tetsuro Motoyama;Avery Fong

  • Object-oriented method and system of remote diagnostic, control and information collection using multiple formats and multiple protocols

    Tetsuro Motoyama;Avery Fong

  • Use of a database in a network-based project schedule management system

    Tetsuro Motoyama;Avery Fong

  • Method and system of remote diagnostic, control and information collection using a shared resource

    Tetsuro Motoyama;Avery Fong

  • Method and system of remote diagnostic, control and information collection using a dynamic linked library

    Avery Fong;Tetsuro Motoyama;Yevgeniya Lyapustina

  • Application unit monitoring and reporting system and method

    Tetsuro Motoyama;Avery Fong;Yevgeniya Lyapustina

  • Object-oriented system and computer program product for mapping structured information to different structured information

    Tetsuro Motoyama;Avery Fong;Anurag Bhatnagar

  • System, fremgangsmåte og dataprodukt for å overföre fjernstöttedata til en monitor ved hjelp av e-post

    Motoyama Tetsuro;Fong Avery

  • Method and system of data collection and mapping from a remote position reporting device

    Tetsuro Motoyama;Avery Fong

  • SYSTEM FOR REMOTE MONITORING, METHOD THEREFOR, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND RECORDING MEDIUM

    Motoyama Tetsuro;Fong Avery

  • Method and system for managing vendor and model information in a multi-protocol remote monitoring system

    Tetsuro Motoyama;Avery Fong

  • Method and system for using data structures to store database information for multiple vendors and model support for remotely monitored devices

    Tetsuro Motoyama;Avery Fong

  • Remote system usage monitoring with flexible encoding and decoding objects

    Tetsuro Motoyama;Avery Fong;Yevgeniya Lyapustina

  • Method and system of remote monitoring and support of devices, extracting data from different types of email messages, and storing data according to data structures determined by the message types

    Tetsuro Motoyama;Avery Fong

  • ELECTRONIC SOFTWARE DESIGN SPECIFICATION DOCUMENT VERIFICATION METHOD AND DEVICE, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM

    Motoyama Tetsuro;Fong Avery

  • Method and system for using internal data structures for storing information related to remotely monitored devices

    Tetsuro Motoyama;Avery Fong

  • System, computer program product and method for managing and controlling a local network of electronic devices

    Avery Fong

Frequent Co-Authors

Tetsuro Motoyama
Tetsuro Motoyama Ricoh (Japan)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees offers flexible and affordable routes for students interested in computer science careers. Many learners are opting for programs such as online associate degree programs as a starting point, which can lead directly to entry-level jobs or serve as a stepping stone to a bachelor’s degree.

For those looking to advance their education quickly, the quickest cheapest masters degree options allow professionals to upskill without a long time commitment or excessive debt. Choosing graduate degrees that are worth it can enhance career prospects in rapidly growing sectors like AI, cybersecurity, and data science.

Additionally, finding the cheapest online college can significantly reduce financial barriers to obtaining a degree. Exploring these diverse pathways helps students and working professionals make informed decisions that align with their career goals and budgets.

Best Scientists Citing Avery Fong

Recently Published Articles