World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
43
Citations
4799
World Ranking
7494
National Ranking
3225

Antonio Coimbra publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Coimbra sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 69 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Antonio Coimbra D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Coimbra sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Antonio Coimbra is affiliated with the Institute of Business & Medical Careers in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine with a particular emphasis on Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine as subfields.

Their work covers various main topics related to oncological conditions and surgical interventions, specifically:

  • Tumors and Oncological Cases
  • Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Head and Neck Surgical Oncology

Antonio Coimbra has published in the journal Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. A recent paper from 2025 includes:

  • "Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia in oral lichen planus: a case report," published in Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

Their frequent co-authors consist of several researchers with whom they have collaborated on at least one publication each, including:

  • Ana Beatriz Tavares Cunha Belém
  • Gabriel Fragoso Cestari
  • Melka Coêlho Sá
  • Cléverson Luciano Trento
  • Cristiano Gaujac

Best Publications

  • GABA decreases in the spinal cord dorsal horn after peripheral neurectomy

    JoséM. Castro-Lopes;Isaura Tavares;Antonio Coimbra

  • Two types of synaptic glomeruli and their distribution in laminae I–III of the rat spinal cord

    A. Ribeiro‐Da‐Silva;Antonio Coimbra

  • A Golgi study of the neuronal population of the marginal zone (lamina I) of the rat spinal cord

    Deolinda Lima;Antonio Coimbra

  • The spinothalamic system of the rat: structural types of retrogradely labelled neurons in the marginal zone (lamina I).

    D. Lima;A. Coimbra

  • Desensitization of Bladder Sensory Fibers by Intravesical Capsaicin has Long Lasting Clinical and Urodynamic Effects in Patients With Hyperactive or Hypersensitive Bladder Dysfunction

    Francisco Cruz;Miguel Guimaraes;Carlos Silva;Maria Edite Rio

  • The spino-latero-reticular system of the rat: projections from the superficial dorsal horn and structural characterization of marginal neurons involved.

    D. Lima;J.A. Mendes-Ribeiro;A. Coimbra

  • The substantia gelatinosa Rolandi of the rat. Fine structure, cytochemistry (acid phosphatase) and changes after dorsal root section

    Unknown

  • Opiates modify induction of c-fos proto-oncogene in the spinal cord of the rat following noxious stimulation

    T. R. Tölle;J. M. Castro-Lopes;A. Coimbra;W. Zieglgänsberger

  • Morphological types of spinomesencephalic neurons in the marginal zone (lamina I) of the rat spinal cord, as shown after retrograde labelling with cholera toxin subunit B.

    Deolinda Lima;Antonio Coimbra

  • Ultrastructural changes of the central scalloped (C1) primary afferent endings of synaptic glomeruli in the substantia gelatinosa Rolandi of the rat after peripheral neurotomy.

    J. M. Castro-Lopes;A. Coimbra;G. Grant;J. Arvidsson

  • Increase in GABAergic Cells and GABA Levels in the Spinal Cord in Unilateral Inflammation of the Hindlimb in the Rat.

    J. M. Castro-Lopes;Isaura Tavares;T. R. Tölle;Ana Coito

  • Differential activation of c-fos in spinal neurones by distinct classes of noxious stimuli

    Deolinda Lima;A. Avelino;A. Coimbra

  • Carrageenan-induced inflammation of the hind foot provokes a rise of GABA-immunoreactive cells in the rat spinal cord that is prevented by peripheral neurectomy or neonatal capsaicin treatment

    J M Castro-Lopes;I Tavares;T R Tölle;A Coimbra

  • Activation of anterior lobe corticotrophs by electroacupuncture or noxious stimulation in the anaesthetized rat, as shown by colocalization of fos protein with ACTH and β-endorphin and increased hormone release

    Baohan Pan;JoséM. Castro-Lopes;Antonio Coimbra

  • Neuronal uptake of [3H]GABA and [3H]glycine in laminae I-III (substantia gelatinosa Rolandi) of the rat spinal cord. An autoradiographic study.

    A. Ribeiro-Da-Silva;Antonio Coimbra

  • Effects of dorsal rhizotomy on the several types of primary afferent terminals in laminae I-III of the rat spinal cord. An electron microscope study.

    Antonio Coimbra;A. Ribeiro-da-Silva;Duarte Pignatelli

  • Neurons in the superficial dorsal horn of the rat spinal cord projecting to the medullary ventrolateral reticular formation express c-fos after noxious stimulation of the skin.

    I. Tavares;D. Lima;A. Coimbra

  • The medullary dorsal reticular nucleus facilitates acute nociception in the rat.

    Armando Almeida;Arne Tjølsen;Deolinda Lima;Antonio Coimbra

  • Descending projections from the medullary dorsal reticular nucleus make synaptic contacts with spinal cord lamina I cells projecting to that nucleus: An electron microscopic tracer study in the rat

    A. Almeida;I. Tavares;D. Lima;A. Coimbra

  • Structural Types of Spinal Cord Marginal (Lamina I) Neurons Projecting to the Nucleus of the Tractus Solitarius in the Rat

    F. Esteves;D. Lima;A. Coimbra

  • Postnatal maturation of primary afferent terminations in the substantia gelatinosa of the rat spinal cord. An electron microscopic study

    D. Pignatelli;A. Ribeiro-da-Silva;A. Coimbra

Frequent Co-Authors

Deolinda Lima
Deolinda Lima University of Porto
Isaura Tavares
Isaura Tavares University of Porto
Walter Zieglgänsberger
Walter Zieglgänsberger Max Planck Society
Thomas R. Tölle
Thomas R. Tölle Technical University of Munich
Gunnar Grant
Gunnar Grant Karolinska Institute
Adalberto Merighi
Adalberto Merighi University of Turin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Antonio Coimbra

Recently Published Articles