World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Angelica M. Stacy publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angelica M. Stacy sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Angelica M. Stacy D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angelica M. Stacy sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

Angelica M. Stacy is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research centers primarily on social sciences and psychology, with a focus on education, safety research, and developmental and educational psychology as subfields. The main topics addressed in their work include science education and pedagogy, career development and diversity, and educational strategies and epistemologies.

They have contributed to multiple publications, including articles in the Journal of Chemical Education and the Journal of College Science Teaching. Two recent papers authored by or involving Angelica M. Stacy are:

  • "Moving Toward Inclusivity in Chemistry by Developing Data-Based Instructional Tasks Aimed at Increasing Students' Self-Perception as Capable Learners Who Belong in STEM" (2021, Journal of Chemical Education)
  • "Designing to Disrupt Traditional Conceptions of Scientific Competence" (2020, Journal of College Science Teaching)

Angelica M. Stacy has collaborated frequently with a range of co-authors, including:

  • Erin Sandhusen Palmer
  • Carmen Works
  • Jennifer Whiles Lillig
  • Chase Clark
  • Paul Lemuel Daubenmire

The combination of fields and topics highlights a research trajectory focused on improving inclusivity and changing traditional approaches within science education. This involves the design and implementation of instructional tasks and strategies intended to shift perceptions of competence among learners, particularly in STEM disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Optical Negative Refraction in Bulk Metamaterials of Nanowires

    Jie Yao;Zhaowei Liu;Yongmin Liu;Yuan Wang

  • Electrodeposition of Ordered Bi2Te3 Nanowire Arrays

    Amy Lucia Prieto;Melissa S. Sander;Marisol Martín-González;Ronald Gronsky

  • Fabrication of High‐Density, High Aspect Ratio, Large‐Area Bismuth Telluride Nanowire Arrays by Electrodeposition into Porous Anodic Alumina Templates

    Melissa S. Sander;Amy L. Prieto;Ronald Gronsky;Timothy Sands

  • Search for Isotope Effect in Superconducting Y-Ba-Cu-O

    L C Bourne;M F Crommie;A Zettl;Hans Conrad zur Loye

  • Insights into the Electrodeposition of Bi2Te3

    Marisol S. Martı́n-González;Amy L. Prieto;Ronald Gronsky;Timothy Sands

  • The Role of Metacognition in Learning Chemistry.

    Dawn Rickey;Angelica M. Stacy

  • Observation of an oxygen isotope effect in YBa 2 Cu 3 O 7

    Kevin J Leary;Kevin J Leary;Hans Conrad zur Loye;Hans Conrad zur Loye;Steven W Keller;Steven W Keller;Tanya A Faltens;Tanya A Faltens

  • Structure of Bismuth Telluride Nanowire Arrays Fabricated by Electrodeposition into Porous Anodic Alumina Templates

    M. S. Sander;R. Gronsky;and T. Sands;A. M. Stacy

  • Observation of an Isotope Shift in the Superconducting Transition Temperature of La 1.85 Sr 0.15 CuO 4

    Tanya A Faltens;William K Ham;Steven W Keller;Kevin J. Leary

  • Direct Electrodeposition of Highly Dense 50 nm Bi2Te3-ySey Nanowire Arrays

    Marisol Martín-González;G. Jeffrey Snyder;Amy Lucia Prieto;Ronald Gronsky

  • Microwave observation of magnetic field penetration of high-Tc superconducting oxides.

    K. Khachaturyan;E. R. Weber;P. Tejedor;Angelica M. Stacy

  • High‐Density 40 nm Diameter Sb‐Rich Bi2–xSbxTe3 Nanowire Arrays

    Marisol Martín-González;Amy Lucia Prieto;Amy Lucia Prieto;Ronald Gronsky;Timothy Sands;Timothy Sands

  • Raman spectra of IVB and VIB transition metal disulfides using laser energies near the absorption edges

    A.M. Stacy;D.T. Hodul

  • Promoting understanding of chemical bonding and spontaneity through student explanation and integration of ideas

    Melonie A. Teichert;Angelica M. Stacy

  • Preparation of high-surface-area transition-metal nitrides: molybdenum nitrides, Mo2N and MoN

    Christopher H. Jaggers;James N. Michaels;Angelica M. Stacy

  • The electrodeposition of high-density, ordered arrays of Bi1-xSbx nanowires.

    Amy Lucia Prieto;Marisol Martín-González;Jennifer Keyani;Ronald Gronsky

  • Superconductivity in the layered compound LixNbO2

    Margret J. Geselbracht;Thomas J. Richardson;Angelica M. Stacy;Angelica M. Stacy

  • Thermal properties of electrodeposited bismuth telluride nanowires embedded in amorphous alumina

    D.-A. Borca-Tasciuc;G. Chen;A. Prieto;M. S. Martín-González

  • Electrodeposited bismuth telluride nanowire arrays with uniform growth fronts.

    Lynn Trahey;Catherine R. Becker;Angelica M. Stacy

  • Carbon and oxygen atom mobility during activation of Mo2C catalysts

    Kevin J. Leary;James N. Michaels;Angelica M. Stacy

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald Gronsky
Ronald Gronsky University of California, Berkeley
Timothy D. Sands
Timothy D. Sands Virginia Tech
Alex Zettl
Alex Zettl University of California, Berkeley
Hans-Conrad zur Loye
Hans-Conrad zur Loye University of South Carolina
Marvin L. Cohen
Marvin L. Cohen University of California, Berkeley
Marisol Martín-González
Marisol Martín-González Spanish National Research Council
Xiang Zhang
Xiang Zhang University of Hong Kong
Lawrence F. Dahl
Lawrence F. Dahl University of Wisconsin–Madison
Zhaowei Liu
Zhaowei Liu University of California, San Diego
Mark Wilson
Mark Wilson University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in Chemistry can open doors to various career pathways in the medical and scientific fields. For those interested in the healthcare industry, becoming a pharmacist is a popular, yet challenging option. To learn more about the demands of this career, explore is it hard to become a pharmacist.

If your passion lies in sales and communication within the pharmaceutical industry, consider becoming a pharmaceutical sales representative. Understanding how much do drug reps make can help you evaluate this career’s financial potential.

For those interested in forensic and medical investigations, an online bachelor's degree in forensic science is a practical starting point. This degree equips students with the scientific foundation needed to work in crime scene analysis and other forensic roles. More details on accessible programs can be found at online bachelor's degree in forensic science.

Additionally, becoming a medical examiner assistant, also known as an autopsy technician, is a vital role that combines biology and investigative skills. Find out more about the educational path and job outlook by reading how to become a medical examiner assistant.

Best Scientists Citing Angelica M. Stacy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles