| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 794 | 24 | 42 | 8 |
The journal generally zeroes in on subjects such as Pharmacology, Metabolism, Biochemistry, Metabolite and Pharmacokinetics. Pharmacology research presented in it encompasses a variety of subjects, including CYP3A4 and In vivo. The studies in Metabolism featured incorporate elements of Urine, Stereochemistry and Hydroxylation.
The journal explores research in Excretion and overlapping concepts in Absorption (skin) to expand the discourse in Urine. Biochemistry studies presented in the journal focus on topics such as Microsome, Enzyme, In vitro, Glutathione and Drug metabolism. While the primary focus in it is Microsome, it also dissects topics surrounding Cytochrome P450 and Isozyme as a whole.
The journal addresses concerns in Metabolite which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Chromatography, Biotransformation and Metabolic pathway. The research on Pharmacokinetics discussed in the journal draws on the closely related field of Distribution (pharmacology). The works on Internal medicine deal in particular with Toxicity.
The journal publications tackle a plethora of topics, such as Biochemistry, Pharmacology, Metabolism, Microsome and Metabolite. While the most cited papers focused on Pharmacology, they were also able to explore topics like CYP3A4 and In vivo. The journal papers focus on Metabolism but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Urine, Glutathione and Biotransformation.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Xenobiotica (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Xenobiotica (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 12.40% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 16.81% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 8.85% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 15.04% of all publications and 59.29% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Seigo Sanoh;Yoichi Naritomi;Satoshi Kitamura;Akihiko Shinagawa
(2020)Shotaro Uehara;Nao Yoneda;Yuichiro Higuchi;Hiroshi Yamazaki
(2021)Shotaro Uehara;Nao Yoneda;Yuichiro Higuchi;Hiroshi Yamazaki
(2020)Haruna Nagayoshi;Norie Murayama;Masaki Tsujino;Shigeo Takenaka
(2020)Billy J. Molloy;Adam King;Lauren G. Mullin;Lee A. Gethings
(2021)Takeshi Sawada;Yoshiyuki Yamaura;Satonori Higuchi;Haruo Imawaka
(2020)Chukwunonso K Nwabufo;Omozojie P Aigbogun;Kevin J H Allen;Madeline N Owens
(2021)Haruna Nagayoshi;Norie Murayama;Shigeo Takenaka;Vitchan Kim
(2021)For students pursuing Medicine in the USA, diversifying skill sets through complementary fields can enhance career prospects. Many professionals explore degrees like a business administration degree online to develop core management skills, essential for running medical practices or healthcare startups.
Leadership in healthcare requires robust expertise, which can be gained through an online master's in organizational leadership. This degree focuses on effective team management and decision-making—critical for medical managers and administrators.
Moreover, an best MBA for operations management can provide strategic insights into optimizing hospital workflows and healthcare delivery systems, helping practitioners improve patient outcomes and operational efficiency.
For busy medical students and professionals, flexibility is key. Many choose MBA programs online no GMAT to balance rigorous schedules without entrance exam hurdles, accelerating their path to leadership roles within the medical field.
