| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecology and Evolution | 84 | 46 | 48 | 31 |
| Biology and Biochemistry | 116 | 62 | 106 | 39 |
| Environmental Sciences | 224 | 29 | 35 | 23 |
The journal focuses on Aquaculture, Fishery, Ecology, Fish farming and Zoology. While Aquaculture is the focus of Reviews in Aquaculture, it also provided insights into the studies of Food science, Agriculture, Biotechnology, Shrimp and Sustainability. The studies in Fishery featured incorporate elements of Aquatic animal, Hatchery and Mariculture.
The journal papers focus largely on the fields of Aquaculture, Fishery, Fish farming, Ecology and Biotechnology. The journal articles facilitate discussions on Aquaculture that incorporate concepts from other fields like Nutrient, Shrimp, Natural resource economics, Aquatic animal and Sustainability. The journal articles address concerns in Fishery which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Agriculture, Aquaculture industry, China, Marine aquaculture and Functional food.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Reviews in Aquaculture (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Reviews in Aquaculture (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 6.12% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 26.81% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 18.84% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 18.12% of all publications and 36.23% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Mahmoud A.O. Dawood;Mahmoud A.O. Dawood
(2021)Andrew van der Schatte Olivier;Laurence Jones;Lewis Le Vay;Michael Christie
(2020)Thora Lieke;Thora Lieke;Thomas Meinelt;Seyed Hossein Hoseinifar;Bo Pan
(2020)Kelly Thornber;David Verner-Jeffreys;David Verner-Jeffreys;Steve Hinchliffe;Muhammad Meezanur Rahman
(2020)Mahmoud A.O. Dawood;Shunsuke Koshio
(2020)Studying Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to various career paths, especially in healthcare and research. For students interested in combining life sciences with mental health, there are several online degree options worth exploring. Programs like online clinical mental health counseling provide flexible pathways to enter counseling fields, integrating biological knowledge with patient care.
Those seeking an accelerated route can consider fast track mental health counseling programs. These options allow for quicker completion, meeting the demands of a rapidly growing mental health sector.
Specialized studies, such as a child mental health masters, offer targeted training for working with younger populations, marrying biological sciences with psychological development insights.
For a broader focus, many consider online masters programs for counseling that provide versatile skill sets applicable in multiple health-related careers. Overall, these online degree options complement a background in Biology or Biochemistry by enhancing career flexibility in health and counseling sectors.
