Resources Policy

Top Research Topics at Resources Policy?

The journal focuses on Natural resource economics, Natural resource, Econometrics, Production (economics) and Resource (biology). The studies on Natural resource economics discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of China and Sustainable development. The Natural resource works, particularly on Resource curse are tackled in it.

Volatility (finance) is a key component of Econometrics research discussed in it. The journal focused on Volatility (finance) research but expanded to cover Monetary economics.

• Natural resource economics (16.47%)
• Natural resource (10.05%)
• Econometrics (9.98%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories (496 citations)
• Rare earth elements as critical raw materials: Focus on international markets and future strategies (438 citations)
• The paths to social licence to operate: An integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining $ (374 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Resources Policy:

The main points discussed in the published articles deal with Natural resource economics, Econometrics, Economic growth, Sustainable development and Natural resource. While the primary focus in the published papers is Natural resource economics, they also dissect topics surrounding Production (economics) and Economy as a whole. The most cited papers explore topics in Sustainable development which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Corporate social responsibility, Public relations and Sustainability.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

• World War II
• Law
• China

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

The objective of Resources Policy is to combine knowledge in the areas of Econometrics, Monetary economics, Natural resource, Volatility (finance) and Natural resource economics. It focuses on Econometrics research which is adjacent to topics in Futures contract. While work presented in the journal provided substantial information on Monetary economics, it also covered topics in Spillover effect, Financial crisis, Stock market and Diversification (finance), Portfolio.

The Natural resource studies discussed in it incorporate research from disciplines like

• Resource (biology) which is related to area like China,
• Sustainable development that intertwine with fields like Sustainability.. While it focused on Volatility (finance), it was also able to explore topics like Index (economics) and Commodity. Discussions in Resources Policy are anchored in the subject of Natural resource economics and the similar topic of Ecological footprint.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

• How COVID-19 drives connectedness among commodity and financial markets: Evidence from TVP-VAR and causality-in-quantiles techniques (44 citations)
• Nexus between energy poverty and energy efficiency: Estimating the long-run dynamics (37 citations)
• Does institutional quality and remittances inflow crowd-in private investment to avoid Dutch Disease? A case for emerging seven (E7) economies (31 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Resources Policy (based on the number of publications) are:

• Marian Radetzki (37 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition,
• John E. Tilton (35 papers) absent at the last edition,
• David Humphreys (30 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Xuan Vinh Vo (24 papers) published 18 papers at the last edition, 12 more than at the previous edition,
• James Otto (21 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Resources Policy (based on the number of publications) are:

• Colorado School of Mines (94 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (60 papers) published 17 papers at the last edition, 9 more than at the previous edition,
• Central South University (46 papers) published 16 papers at the last edition, 7 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Queensland (45 papers) published 7 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
• University of the Witwatersrand (37 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 10.20% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 16.67% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 12.56% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 13.29% of all publications and 57.49% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Applying the Research and the Importance in the Real World

An area that seems to be missing from the article is a section discussing the potential applications of the research covered in the journal, and its importance in real-world scenarios. The discussion could also touch on the relevance of the research to fields like accounting and finance, and even link to educational opportunities in these fields more broadly. Here's a draft of this potential missing section: The research papers published in the journal of Resources Policy have far-reaching impacts beyond academia. They offer crucial insights into a multitude of domains, such as Natural resource economics, and Econometrics that could inform practices in the business world and economic policies. In addition to contributing to scholarly discussions and debates, the research from this journal provides valuable knowledge for practical applications in business operations and government policies.

For instance, articles exploring Natural resource economics could be of considerable interest to businesses operating in sectors like mining, where understanding the dynamics of resource allocation and economic implications can be crucial. Simultaneously, research in Econometrics could provide governments and policy-makers with better insight into economic trends and forecasts, which could in turn shape sound economic policies and planning.

If you are interested in diving deeper into areas related to Natural resource economics or Econometrics, you might consider pursuing relevant academic degrees or certifications. One way to do so is to start your educational journey in a field like accounting, which can provide a robust foundation for understanding complex economic concepts. For example, you might explore some of the best accounting schools in Arkansas and deepen your understanding of these fields.

Understanding and applying the latest research in these areas can lead to more sustainable and efficient practices in both the private and public sectors. Therefore, the knowledge and insights found in the research papers of the Resources Policy Journal offer not only academic value but also practical utility for a better economic future.