| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Political Science | 306 | 4 | 7 | 3 |
Patterns of Prejudice is organized to address concerns in the fields of Law, Gender studies, Antisemitism, Politics and Racism. The studies on Law discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Political economy and Criminology. The main emphasis of the journal is the research on Gender studies, emphasizing the topic of Race (biology).
While Patterns of Prejudice focused on Antisemitism, it was also able to explore topics like Religious studies and The Holocaust. The work tackled in it goes beyond the discipline of Religious studies as it also encompasses Prejudice (legal term). More specifically, the research on Politics in it is related to Nationalism.
The most cited publications are organized to reinforce research efforts on Law, Gender studies, Racism, Politics and Political economy. The journal papers deal with Law in conjunction with Antisemitism and similar fields in Conceptualization and The Holocaust. The most cited publications focus on Racism but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Context (language use), Ethnic group and Race (biology).
The aim of the journal is to expand the discussion of research in Conversation, Secularism, Multiculturalism, Religious studies and Populism. The journal dives deep in exploring the relationship between the study of Conversation and Politics. The research on Politics tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Environmental ethics, Political economy and Facade.
The journal addresses concerns in Religious studies which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Nationalism, Immigration and Manifesto. Some problems in Populism that were presented in Patterns of Prejudice overlapped with concepts under Liberalism, Neutrality and Conservatism. Issues in Neutrality were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Positive economics and Media studies.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Patterns of Prejudice (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Patterns of Prejudice (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 68.75% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 20.00% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 20.00% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 20.00% of all publications and 40.00% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Research in prejudice studies not only contributes to an understanding of societal attitudes and behaviors but also opens up a range of career opportunities. Many researchers often pursue careers in academia as professors or lecturers. But other career paths also emerge from this kind of focused research. For example, substantial knowledge and understanding of topics such as antisemitism, racism, and nationalism can be useful in various professional roles including social workers, policy analysts, journalists, and even as librarians who can guide readers toward insightful resources on these topics.
For instance, becoming a librarian requires expertise in categorizing, searching, and understanding a wide range of topics. It may be exciting to realize that an in-depth understanding of prejudice studies could enhance the ability of a librarian to guide readers through the multitude of information resources available on these subjects.
Every state has its requirements for becoming a librarian. If you're interested in exploring this career in West Virginia, you can take a detailed look at the school librarian requirements in West Virginia. Having research experience in prejudice studies can offer a unique perspective and competency in this profession as you assist readers and researchers in their search for knowledge.
Yolande Jansen;Nasar Meer
(2020)Tariq Modood
(2021)Tariq Modood
(2021)Tariq Modood
(2021)Tariq Modood
(2021)Studying Political Science opens doors to various related fields that can enhance your career prospects. For those interested in shaping urban environments, pursuing an online masters urban planning offers a specialized focus on sustainable city development and policy implementation.
If you are fascinated by the psychological aspects behind legal systems, exploring a forensic psychology degree can be rewarding. Understanding how much do forensic psychologists make provides insight into the lucrative opportunities and job stability within this niche.
For those aiming for advanced academic credentials without the extensive research burden, online programs providing a phd without dissertation are becoming increasingly popular, allowing students to focus on practical leadership and policy skills.
Additionally, an online Master of Public Administration is a valuable pathway for careers in government and non-profits. Reviewing the top online mpa programs can help prospective students find fast, accredited options that align with their career goals.
