Ranking & Metrics
Impact Score is a novel metric devised to rank conferences based on the number of contributing the best scientists in addition to the h-index estimated from the scientific papers published by the best scientists. See more details on our methodology page.
Ore Geology Reviews investigates areas of study like Geochemistry, Mineralization (geology), Pyrite, Zircon and Hydrothermal circulation.
Ore Geology Reviews emphasizes research on Geochemistry, which includes concerns such as Metamorphic rock.
Discussions in Ore Geology Reviews are anchored in the subject of Metamorphic rock and the similar topic of Metamorphism.
The studies on Mineralization (geology) discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Volcanic rock, Sedimentary rock, Trace element, Carbonate and Breccia.
Pyrite research presented in it encompasses a variety of subjects, including Arsenopyrite, Chalcopyrite, δ34S and Galena.
Zircon research in Ore Geology Reviews involves the investigation of Geochronology studies, all of which are linked to disciplines such as Isochron.
Meteoric water and Calcite are some topics wherein Fluid inclusions research discussed in the journal have an impact.
Quartz research is the primary subject tackled in the journal with a focus on Vein (geology).
The Mineralogy study featured in Ore Geology Reviews draws connections with the study of Mineral.
Geochemistry (98.77%)
Mineralization (geology) (23.64%)
Pyrite (16.75%)
What are the most cited papers published in the journal?
Orogenic gold deposits : A proposed classification in the context of their crustal distribution and relationship to other gold deposit types (1270 citations)
Orogenic gold and geologic time: a global synthesis (857 citations)
P—T—t—deformation—fluid characteristics of lode gold deposits: evidence from alteration systematics (439 citations)
Research areas of the most cited articles at Ore Geology Reviews:
The published articles mostly deal with topics like Geochemistry, Mineralogy, Mineralization (geology), Hydrothermal circulation and Pyrite.
The most cited papers facilitate discussions on Geochemistry that incorporate concepts from other fields like Skarn, Fluid inclusions and Craton.
The Mineralogy research presented in the most cited papers focuses mostly on Sedimentary rock and, on occasion, topics in Diagenesis.
What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?
Mineral
Geochemistry
Organic chemistry
The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:
The journal mainly deals with areas of study such as Geochemistry, Mineralization (geology), Zircon, Pyrite and Hydrothermal circulation.
It holds forums on Geochemistry that merges themes from other disciplines such as Skarn, Fluid inclusions and Mineral.
It facilitates discussions on Fluid inclusions that incorporate concepts from other fields like Inclusion (mineral), Petrography and Meteoric water.
Ore Geology Reviews addresses concerns in Mineralization (geology) which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Sedimentary rock, Magnetite, Metamorphic rock and Carbonate.
The presented research on Zircon deals specifically with Felsic but it also addresses topics in Volcanic rock.
It explores research in Chalcopyrite and overlapping concepts in Sulfide to expand the discourse in Pyrite.
The most cited articles from the last journal are:
Concentration-concentration fractal modelling: A novel insight for correlation between variables in response to changes in the underlying controlling geological-geochemical processes (13 citations)
Cobalt resources in Europe and the potential for new discoveries (7 citations)
Pyrite trace element behavior in magmatic-hydrothermal environments: an LA-ICPMS imaging study (7 citations)
Papers citation over time
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
Research.com
Top authors and change over time
The top authors publishing in Ore Geology Reviews (based on the number of publications) are:
M. Santosh (105 papers) published 13 papers at the last edition, 4 more than at the previous edition,
Franco Pirajno (73 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
Jingwen Mao (67 papers) published 9 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
Yan-Jing Chen (51 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 3 more than at the previous edition,
Jun Deng (49 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition.
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Research.com
Top affiliations and change over time
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Ore Geology Reviews (based on the number of publications) are:
Chinese Academy of Sciences (665 papers) published 105 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (514 papers) published 94 papers at the last edition, 21 more than at the previous edition,
University of Western Australia (275 papers) published 18 papers at the last edition, 12 less than at the previous edition,
China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) (266 papers) published 58 papers at the last edition, 16 more than at the previous edition,
China Geological Survey (159 papers) published 45 papers at the last edition, 12 more than at the previous edition.
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
Research.com
Publication chance based on affiliation
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
Research.com
During the most recent 2021 edition, 5.39% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 60.71% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 8.25% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 9.43% of all publications and 21.61% were from other institutions.
Returning Authors Index
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
Research.com
Returning Institution Index
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Research.com
The experience to innovation index
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
