| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 1 | 669 | 1058 | 87 |
New Phytologist was organized to reinforce research efforts on Botany, Ecology, Biochemistry, Agronomy and Cell biology. While Botany is the focus of it, it also provided insights into the studies of Symbiosis, Mycorrhiza and Horticulture. Ectomycorrhiza is a key component of Mycorrhiza research discussed in New Phytologist.
More specifically, the research on Ecology in New Phytologist is related to Ecosystem. Most of the Agronomy studies addressed also intersect with Nutrient. New Phytologist focuses on Cell biology but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Arabidopsis, Mutant and Gene.
Discussions in New Phytologist are anchored in the subject of Arabidopsis and the similar topic of Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene research is the primary subject tackled in the journal with a focus on Gene expression.
The journal articles cover a variety of subjects, including Botany, Ecology, Agronomy, Mycorrhiza and Biochemistry. The journal articles explore topics in Botany which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Symbiosis, Nutrient and Horticulture. While work presented in the most cited articles provide substantial information on Mycorrhiza, it also covers topics in Glomus, Arbuscular mycorrhiza, Mycelium and Hypha.
The objective of New Phytologist is to combine knowledge in the areas of Cell biology, Ecology, Gene, Arabidopsis and Mutant. Cell biology research featured in New Phytologist incorporates concerns from various other topics such as Arabidopsis thaliana, Transcription factor, Transcriptional regulation and Auxin. Ecology studies presented in the journal focus on topics such as Ecosystem, Plant community, Biodiversity and Climate change.
Research on Gene presented in New Phytologist concerns the broader topic of Genetics.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in New Phytologist (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in New Phytologist (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 1.50% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 22.22% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 11.55% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 16.01% of all publications and 50.22% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Charlotte Grossiord;Charlotte Grossiord;Thomas N. Buckley;Lucas A. Cernusak;Kimberly A. Novick
(2020)Grégoire T Freschet;Grégoire T Freschet;Catherine Roumet;Louise H Comas;Monique Weemstra
(2021)Chao Xiong;Yongguan Zhu;Juntao Wang;Brajesh K Singh
(2021)Anthony P. Walker;Martin G. De Kauwe;Ana Bastos;Soumaya Belmecheri
(2021)Grégoire T Freschet;Loïc Pagès;Colleen M Iversen;Louise H Comas
(2021)Thomas Christian de Bang;Søren Husted;Kristian Holst Laursen;Daniel Pergament Persson
(2021)Rana Munns;Rana Munns;David A Day;Wieland Fricke;Michelle Watt
(2020)Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia;Stijn Vaessen;Milagros Barcelo;Jinhong He
(2020)Alexandra Weigelt;Liesje Mommer;Karl Andraczek;Colleen M. Iversen
(2021)Rana Munns;Rana Munns;John B. Passioura;Timothy D. Colmer;Caitlin S. Byrt;Caitlin S. Byrt
(2020)Pursuing Chemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways and related online degrees. For those interested in the healthcare sector, exploring online accelerated nursing programs for non nurses provides a streamlined route to enter nursing without prior experience. These programs offer a practical transition into healthcare with foundational and advanced knowledge.
Similarly, students considering specialization can check out the easiest fnp program. Family Nurse Practitioner degrees are in high demand and often available online, making it a convenient choice for further study beyond a chemistry background, especially in clinical and patient-focused roles.
For those interested in healthcare administration or medical documentation, the job outlook for medical billing and coding highlights stability and growth. This career path can complement a chemistry education by offering specialized knowledge related to medical records and billing systems.
Nurses aiming to enhance their qualifications can benefit from rn to bsn programs with no clinicals, allowing a focus on leadership and research skills while advancing their education fully online. This pathway underscores the flexibility and accessibility of online degrees in related scientific and healthcare fields.
Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF), CSIC
Publications: 8