Klinische Neurophysiologie

Top Research Topics at Klinische Neurophysiologie?

Klinische Neurophysiologie investigates areas of study like Neuroscience, Audiology, Gynecology, Electrodiagnosis and Electroencephalography.

• Neuroscience (17.67%)
• Audiology (5.11%)
• Gynecology (5.03%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• Empfehlungen zur Durchführung und Auswertung polygraphischer Ableitungen im diagnostischen Schlaflabor (74 citations)
• A novel method for reliable and fast extraction of neuronal EEG/MEG oscillations on the basis of spatio-spectral decomposition (37 citations)
• Visuell evozierte Potentiale bei Musterbewegung (32 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Klinische Neurophysiologie:

The most cited papers mainly deal with areas of study such as Electrodiagnosis, Neuroscience, Electroencephalography, Gynecology and Evoked potential. While the journal articles focused on Electrodiagnosis, they were also able to explore topics like Adaptation (eye), Nuclear magnetic resonance and Audiology. The journal papers hold forums on Neuroscience that merge themes from other disciplines such as Imaging Procedures and Ion selective microelectrodes.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

• Internal medicine
• Disease
• Neuroscience

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

The journal was organized to reinforce research efforts on Gynecology, Multiple sklerose, Quantitative sensory testing, Seizure detection and Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy. The study on Gynecology presented is investigated in conjunction with research in Status epilepticus. The journal focuses on Multiple sklerose as well as the interrelated topic of Conduction time.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

• Wearables bei Epilepsien (2 citations)
• Evozierte Potenziale – Reminder und Update (0 citations)
• Nicht zum Lachen: eine Begleiterscheinung der Corona-Pandemie (0 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Klinische Neurophysiologie (based on the number of publications) are:

• Walter Paulus (47 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Simon B. Eickhoff (47 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Reinhard Dengler (47 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Otto W. Witte (46 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Marianne Dieterich (43 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Klinische Neurophysiologie (based on the number of publications) are:

• Max Planck Society (32 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Charité (31 papers) absent at the last edition,
• RWTH Aachen University (25 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (21 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Hochschule Hannover (20 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 70.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 44.44% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 0.00% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 44.44% of all publications and 11.11% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Career Path: Becoming a Speech Language Pathologist

A career as a Speech Language Pathologist is an exciting prospect for those who are passionate about helping people with communication disorders. They evaluate, diagnose, treat, and help to prevent communication and swallowing disorders in patients. A key part of the Neurophysiologie field, there are opportunities for those looking to pursue this career in various settings including schools, private practices, hospitals, research institutions, and more. Many students may wonder how to get started on this career path. To become a Speech Language Pathologist, one needs a bachelor's degree in a related field, a master's degree in speech-language pathology, and then licensure to practice. Requirements may vary by state, and prospective Speech Pathologists should research the specific qualifications in their area of residence. For instance, if you're aiming to become a speech therapist in Arizona, there are certain steps you will need to follow, including completing specific coursework, gaining supervised clinical experience, and passing a national examination. We have detailed the entire process on our webpage. If you want to learn more, follow the link how to be a speech therapist in Arizona for more detailed information. The career demands a high level of determination, patience and sensitivity, as dealing with speech disorders can often be a slow and frustrating process. However, the rewards of witnessing the progress of patients and contributing to their quality of life make it a fulfilling career choice.