World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
7921
World Ranking
5400
National Ranking
440

Beate Diehl publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beate Diehl sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 191 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Beate Diehl D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beate Diehl sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Beate Diehl is a researcher affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their work spans multiple areas within neuroscience and medicine, with a strong emphasis on the study and treatment of epilepsy as well as cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist has contributed to research published in a variety of venues, among the most frequent being:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Epilepsia
  • Brain Communications
  • Frontiers in Neurology

Beate Diehl's main fields of study include neuroscience and medicine, supported by a substantial number of publications in these areas. Subfields of particular focus are cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, cellular and molecular neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, as well as pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

Within their research topics, the following subjects have been prominent:

  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Some recent notable publications co-authored by Beate Diehl include:

  • Cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with dissociative seizures (CODES): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial, 2020, published in The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Intracranial EEG in the 21st Century, 2020, published in Epilepsy Currents
  • Comparative Effectiveness of Stereotactic Electroencephalography Versus Subdural Grids in Epilepsy Surgery, 2021, published in Annals of Neurology
  • Theta power and theta-gamma coupling support long-term spatial memory retrieval, 2020, published in Hippocampus
  • Normative brain mapping of interictal intracranial EEG to localize epileptogenic tissue, 2021, published in Brain

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • John S. Duncan
  • Fahmida A Chowdhury
  • Yujiang Wang
  • Jane de Tisi
  • Andrew W. McEvoy

Best Publications

  • Hemodynamic correlates of epileptiform discharges : An EEG-fMRI study of 63 patients with focal epilepsy

    Afraim Salek-Haddadi;Beate Diehl;Khalid Hamandi;Martin Merschhemke

  • Abnormalities in diffusion tensor imaging of the uncinate fasciculus relate to reduced memory in temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Beate Diehl;Robyn M. Busch;John S. Duncan;Zhe Piao

  • A prospective, multicenter study of cardiac-based seizure detection to activate vagus nerve stimulation

    Paul Boon;Kristl Vonck;Kenou van Rijckevorsel;Riem El Tahry

  • Postconvulsive central apnea as a biomarker for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP)

    Laura Vilella;Nuria Lacuey;Johnson P. Hampson;M. R.Sandhya Rani

  • Simultaneous intracranial EEG and fMRI of interictal epileptic discharges in humans

    Serge Vulliemoz;David W. Carmichael;Karin Rosenkranz;Beate Diehl;Beate Diehl

  • Temporal lobe epilepsy: When are invasive recordings needed?

    B. Diehl;Hans Luders

  • The incidence and significance of periictal apnea in epileptic seizures.

    Nuria Lacuey;Bilal Zonjy;Johnson P. Hampson;M. R. Sandhya Rani

  • Epileptic Networks in Focal Cortical Dysplasia Revealed Using Electroencephalography–Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Rachel Thornton;Serge Vulliemoz;Serge Vulliemoz;Roman Rodionov;Roman Rodionov;David W. Carmichael;David W. Carmichael

  • Neuroimaging of focal cortical dysplasia.

    Peter Widdess-Walsh;Beate Diehl;Imad Najm

  • Structural imaging biomarkers of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy

    Britta Wandschneider;Matthias Koepp;Matthias Koepp;Catherine Scott;Catherine Scott;Caroline Micallef;Caroline Micallef

  • Seizure localization using ictal phase-locked high gamma: A retrospective surgical outcome study

    Shennan A. Weiss;Athena Lemesiou;Robert Connors;Garrett P. Banks

  • Standardized Computer-based Organized Reporting of EEG: SCORE – second version

    Sándor Beniczky;Harald Aurlien;Jan C. Brøgger;Lawrence J. Hirsch

  • The ventrolateral medulla and medullary raphe in sudden unexpected death in epilepsy

    Smriti Patodia;Alyma Somani;Megan O'Hare;Ranjana Venkateswaran

  • Invasive epilepsy surgery evaluation

    Stjepana Kovac;Vejay N. Vakharia;Catherine Scott;Beate Diehl

  • Evidence for mTOR pathway activation in a spectrum of epilepsy-associated pathologies

    Joan Liu;Cheryl Reeves;Zuzanna Michalak;Antonietta Coppola

  • Seizures induced by direct electrical cortical stimulation--Mechanisms and clinical considerations.

    Stjepana Kovac;Philippe Kahane;Philippe Kahane;Beate Diehl

  • Intracranial EEG in the 21st Century

    Barbara C. Jobst;Fabrice Bartolomei;Beate Diehl;Birgit Frauscher

  • Human Hippocampal Theta Power Indicates Movement Onset and Distance Travelled

    Daniel Bush;James A Bisby;Chris M Bird;Stephanie Gollwitzer

  • Evaluating the Contributions of State of the Art Assessment Techniques to Predicting Memory Outcome after Unilateral Anterior Temporal Lobectomy

    Tara T. Lineweaver;Harold H. Morris;Richard I. Naugle;Imad M. Najm

  • Comparative Effectiveness of Stereotactic Electroencephalography Versus Subdural Grids in Epilepsy Surgery.

    Lara Jehi;Marcia Morita-Sherman;Thomas E. Love;Fabrice Bartolomei

  • Spontaneous oscillations in cerebral blood flow velocity in normal humans and in patients with carotid artery disease.

    Rolf R. Diehl;Beate Diehl;Matthias Sitzer;Michael Hennerici

  • Postictal diffusion-weighted imaging for the localization of focal epileptic areas in temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Beate Diehl;Imad Najm;Paul Ruggieri;Jean Tkach

Frequent Co-Authors

John S. Duncan
John S. Duncan University College London
Louis Lemieux
Louis Lemieux University College London
Andrew W. McEvoy
Andrew W. McEvoy University College London
Matthew C. Walker
Matthew C. Walker University College London
Hans Lüders
Hans Lüders Case Western Reserve University
Samden D. Lhatoo
Samden D. Lhatoo The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Ronald M. Harper
Ronald M. Harper University of California, Los Angeles
Imad Najm
Imad Najm Cleveland Clinic
Sebastien Ourselin
Sebastien Ourselin King's College London
Stephan U. Schuele
Stephan U. Schuele Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Beate Diehl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles