World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Journal of Urban Technology
H-index 15

Journal of Urban Technology

1063-0732

Published by: Taylor & Francis

https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/cjut20

Ranking & Metrics

Discipline name Position Best Scientists Publications D-Index
Social Sciences and Humanities 305 13 21 13
Engineering and Technology 1180 7 8 6

Additional Metrics

Number of Best Scientists*: 34
Documents by Best Scientists*: 35
Top 100 Ranked Scientists*: 5
SCIMAGO H-index: 60
SCIMAGO SJR: 1.186
Impact Factor: 4.4

Overview

Top Research Topics at Journal of Urban Technology?

The topics of Economic growth, Urban planning, Environmental planning, Urban technology and Public relations are the focal point of discussions in the journal. Economic growth study tackled is connected to the field of Information and Communications Technology. The studies in Urban density under the umbrella field of Urban planning overlap with concepts in Smart city.

Sustainable development research discussed connects with the study of Sustainability.

  • Economic growth (14.68%)
  • Urban planning (12.40%)
  • Environmental planning (10.28%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

  • Smart cities in Europe (1774 citations)
  • Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives (1259 citations)
  • Creating Smart-er Cities: An Overview (301 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Journal of Urban Technology:

The main points discussed in the most cited articles deal with Urban planning, Smart city, Urban technology, Economic growth and Sustainability. The journal papers with studies in Urban planning featured incorporate elements of Public participation, Open data, Land-use planning and Sustainable development. The most cited publications hold forums on Economic growth that merge themes from other disciplines such as Economy, Creativity, China and Environmental planning.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

  • World War II
  • Law
  • China

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

The objective of the journal is to combine knowledge in the areas of Smart city, Regional science, Metropolitan area, Media studies and Architectural engineering. While Smart city is the focus of the conference, it also discussed overlapping research pursuits in other fields like Public administration, Urban governance, Environmental planning, Perspective (graphical) and Public relations. The featured Environmental planning works encompass concepts such as Participatory planning and examines them in conjunction with Project implementation.

While Journal of Urban Technology focused on Regional science, it was also able to explore topics like Web service, Smart growth, Digital transformation and Externality. Journal of Urban Technology focuses on Media studies but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Emerging technologies, The Internet and Urban policy. The journal addresses concerns in Urban planning which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Knowledge management and Big data.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

  • How are smart city concepts and technologies perceived and utilized? A systematic geo-Twitter analysis of smart cities in Australia (32 citations)
  • From “Smart in the Box” to “Smart in the City”: Rethinking the Socially Sustainable Smart City in Context (12 citations)
  • Assembling Sustainable Smart City Transitions: An Interdisciplinary Theoretical Perspective (9 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

The top authors publishing in Journal of Urban Technology (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Kheir Al-Kodmany (9 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Tan Yigitcanlar (9 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
  • Mark Deakin (8 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
  • George Bugliarello (7 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Martin de Jong (7 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Journal of Urban Technology (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (10 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
  • Queensland University of Technology (7 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
  • Virginia Tech (6 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
  • Michigan State University (5 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Edinburgh Napier University (5 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 30.30% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 34.78% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 13.04% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 21.74% of all publications and 30.43% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

  • Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
  • Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
  • Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
  • Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
  • Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Top Publications

  • How are smart city concepts and technologies perceived and utilized? A systematic geo-Twitter analysis of smart cities in Australia

    Tan Yigitcanlar;Ruth Nayomi Elizabeth Hewa Heliyagoda Kankanamge;Karen Vella

    (2021)
    161 Citations
  • Assembling Sustainable Smart City Transitions: An Interdisciplinary Theoretical Perspective

    Luca Mora;Mark Deakin;Xiaoling Zhang;Michael Batty

    (2021)
    59 Citations
  • Splintering Urbanism at 20 and the “Infrastructural Turn”

    (2022)
    58 Citations
  • Mapping Two Decades of Autonomous Vehicle Research: A Systematic Scientometric Analysis

    Asif Iqbal Mohammad Faisal;Tan Yigitcanlar;Kamruzzaman;Alexander Paz

    (2021)
    56 Citations
  • Mapping the Knowledge Domain of Smart City Development to Urban Sustainability: A Scientometric Study

    Zezhou Wu;Zezhou Wu;Mingyang Jiang;Heng Li;Xiaoling Zhang

    (2021)
    44 Citations
  • Building City Dashboards for Different Types of Users

    Gareth W. Young;Rob Kitchin;Jeneen Naji

    (2021)
    41 Citations
  • Pathways to the Making of Prosperous Smart Cities: An Exploratory Study on the Best Practice

    Kevin C. Desouza;Michael Hunter;Benoy Jacob;Tan Yigitcanlar

    (2020)
    34 Citations
  • Perceptions and Attitudes Towards the Deployment of Autonomous and Connected Vehicles: Insights from Las Vegas, Nevada

    Sarah Dennis;Alexander Paz;Tan Yigitcanlar

    (2021)
    30 Citations

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities, exploring online degree options can open diverse career pathways. Many programs focus on counseling and psychology, addressing crucial societal needs such as mental health and addiction recovery.

Choosing a program with the right accreditation is essential for quality education and licensure. For example, nasp accredited programs ensure rigorous training for those aiming to support children and adolescents in educational settings.

If you’re interested in helping individuals overcome substance abuse, consider addiction counseling degree online counseling options that prepare graduates for this growing field.

For those new to counseling, exploring accredited easiest counseling degree programs can be a strategic starting point without compromising education standards.

Lastly, quicker paths such as mft online programs provide a practical option for becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist, allowing you to enter the workforce sooner.

Best Scientists Contributing to This Journal