World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
H-index 15

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

Ranking & Metrics

Discipline name Position Best Scientists Publications D-Index
Psychology 497 52 62 14
Social Sciences and Humanities 952 12 16 5

Additional Metrics

Number of Best Scientists*: 78
Documents by Best Scientists*: 87
Top 100 Ranked Scientists*: 6
SCIMAGO H-index: 96
SCIMAGO SJR: 1.064
Impact Factor: 1.4

Overview

Top Research Topics at Journal of Behavioral Decision Making?

The primary areas of discussion in the journal are Social psychology, Cognitive psychology, Econometrics, Task (project management) and Cognition. The concepts on Social psychology presented in it can also apply to other research fields, including Outcome (game theory), Preference and Perception. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making features Econometrics research that overlaps with concepts in Statistics.

Framing (social sciences) works presented in the journal have a specific focus on Framing effect.

  • Social psychology (39.87%)
  • Cognitive psychology (12.71%)
  • Econometrics (10.38%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

  • Mental accounting matters (2118 citations)
  • The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits (1999 citations)
  • A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors (1766 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Journal of Behavioral Decision Making:

The most cited papers investigate studies in Social psychology, Econometrics, Task (project management), Risk perception and Cognition. While work presented in the published articles provide substantial information on Social psychology, it also covers topics in Regret and Perception. Issues in Cognition were discussed in the most cited articles, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Developmental psychology and Cognitive psychology.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

  • Social psychology
  • Law
  • Statistics

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

The objective of the journal is to combine knowledge in the areas of Cognitive psychology, Social psychology, Econometrics, Preference and Cognition. The research on Cognitive psychology tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Cognitive Reflection Test, Delay discounting, Temporal discounting, Task (project management) and Construal level theory. Issues in Social psychology were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Perception and Sensitivity (control systems).

The Econometrics works featured in the journal incorporate elements from Outcome (probability), Rare events and Bayesian probability, Bayesian inference. The studies in Preference featured incorporate elements of Mathematical economics, Attraction, Inclusion (education), Lay theories and Revealed preference. Issues in Cognition were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Heuristics and Competence (human resources).

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

  • Attitudes toward risk and uncertainty: The role of subjective knowledge and affect (4 citations)
  • Seeing the subjective as objective: People perceive the taste of those they disagree with as biased and wrong (4 citations)
  • Measuring cognitive reflection without maths: Development and validation of the verbal cognitive reflection test (3 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

The top authors publishing in Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Karl Halvor Teigen (19 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • David V. Budescu (16 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Irwin P. Levin (15 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Ilana Ritov (14 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
  • Andreas Glöckner (13 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Max Planck Society (60 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 3 more than at the previous edition,
  • Carnegie Mellon University (47 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • University of Pennsylvania (37 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (32 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
  • University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign (32 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 1.45% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 14.71% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 16.18% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 13.24% of all publications and 55.88% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

  • Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
  • Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
  • Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
  • Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
  • Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Career Prospects for Authors Published in the Journal

As an author, doing research and getting published in a renowned journal is just the start, navigating a successful career path is essential. One of the potential career paths is in academics as a school psychologist. This role requires an in-depth understanding of various psychology disciplines, including social psychology and cognitive psychology that are actively discussed in Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. Authors who published in this journal have demonstrated strong competence in these topics, thus, a career in school psychologist role can be a fitting next step. If you are considering this, you might be interested to learn how long does it take to become a school psychologist in new hampshire. Taking this path not only expands your knowledge but also lets you contribute towards the fostering of future minds. Being a school psychologist is rewarding and the process of becoming one, while rigorous, offers an enriching learning journey. If your research interests align with this career path, exploring the requirements would be beneficial. Understand that it's the same tenacity and dedication required in extensive research that will see you through this career choice.

Top Publications

  • Risk-taking increases under boredom

    Ayşenur Kılıç;Wijnand A.P. van Tilburg;Eric R. Igou

    (2020)
    84 Citations
  • Distinguishing three effects of time pressure on risk taking: Choice consistency, risk preference, and strategy selection

    Sebastian Olschewski;Sebastian Olschewski;Jörg Rieskamp

    (2021)
    36 Citations
  • Decision‐making competence and cognitive abilities: Which abilities matter?

    Kenny Skagerlund;Mattias Forsblad;Gustav Tinghög;Daniel Västfjäll

    (2021)
    33 Citations
  • How representations of number and numeracy predict decision paradoxes: A fuzzy-trace theory approach

    Valerie F. Reyna;Priscila G. Brust‐Renck

    (2020)
    27 Citations
  • Behavior in cheating paradigms is linked to overall approval rates of crowdworkers

    Christoph Schild;Christoph Schild;Lau Lilleholt;Ingo Zettler

    (2021)
    27 Citations
  • Preliminary evidence for differential effects of integral and incidental emotions on risk perception and behavioral intentions: A meta‐analysis of eight experiments

    Rebecca A. Ferrer;Erin M. Ellis

    (2021)
    26 Citations
  • Preference for human or algorithmic forecasting advice does not predict if and how it is used

    (2022)
    24 Citations
  • Valuation and Estimation from Experience

    Sebastian Olschewski;Sebastian Olschewski;Ben R. Newell;Yvonne Oberholzer;Benjamin Scheibehenne

    (2021)
    23 Citations
  • Preference or ability: Exploring the relations between risk preference, personality, and cognitive abilities

    Philip Millroth;Peter Juslin;Anders Winman;Håkan Nilsson

    (2020)
    20 Citations
  • Adult Age Differences in Monetary Decisions with Real and Hypothetical Reward

    Sebastian Horn;Alexandra M. Freund

    (2021)
    19 Citations

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in psychology, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career options. An online degree in human services offers a quicker pathway to careers focused on helping individuals and communities, making it a valuable choice for students seeking practical, impact-driven roles.

Transitioning careers is also common in this field. For example, professionals aiming to switch from education may find guidance on becoming a speech and language therapist in the article about teacher to speech and language therapist. This path highlights the versatility within psychology-related careers.

Accreditation is critical, especially in specialized fields like speech-language pathology. Students can find asha online slp programs that combine quality and speed, ensuring credentials meet professional standards without delaying career progression.

For those without a background in communication sciences, speech language pathology bridge programs online are designed to help complete necessary prerequisites and gain the required knowledge. These flexible options create accessible pathways into the profession.

Best Scientists Contributing to This Journal