| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earth Science | 156 | 153 | 336 | 22 |
The journal is mainly concerned with subjects like Cretaceous, Paleontology, Genus, Cenomanian and Biostratigraphy. Cretaceous research presented is mostly focused on the subject of Aptian. The research on Paleontology tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Foraminifera and Fauna.
Foraminifera research presented falls under the umbrella topic of Benthic zone. The journal covered Genus studies as part of research efforts in Ecology and Botany. In particular, the Biostratigraphy works presented emphasize discussions on Biozone.
The research on Facies discussed in Cretaceous Research draws on the closely related field of Sedimentary depositional environment. Among the topics covered in it are Zoology and Burmese.
The published articles focus largely on the fields of Cretaceous, Paleontology, Cenomanian, Biostratigraphy and Aptian. The study of Cretaceous in the published articles encompasses disciplines such as Fauna, as well as fields such as Taxon, all of which overlap with one another. The Paleontology research presented in the published articles focuses mostly on Foraminifera and, on occasion, topics in Marl.
The journal covers a variety of subjects, including Cretaceous, Paleontology, Genus, Zoology and Anatomy. Cenomanian research are fields of study within Cretaceous but they also intertwine with concepts in Context (language use). The research on Paleontology featured in the journal combines topics in other fields like Neosuchia and Paralligatoridae.
The journal explores topics in Genus which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Orthoptera, Biogeography and Biting midge. Issues in Zoology were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Mesozoic and Snakefly. Topics in Anatomy explored in the journal were investigated in conjunction with research in Apex (mollusc), Postcrania and Holotype.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Cretaceous Research (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Cretaceous Research (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2022 edition, 0.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 80.00% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 0.00% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 10.00% of all publications and 10.00% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Mitsuru Arai;Mario Luis Assine
(2020)Andrew Davies;Benjamin Gréselle;Stephen J. Hunter;Graham Baines
(2020)Christophe Hendrickx;Emanuel Tschopp;Martín d. Ezcurra
(2020)Nicholas R. Longrich;Xabier Pereda Suberbiola;R. Alexander Pyron;Nour-Eddine Jalil
(2021)Douaa Fathy;Michael Wagreich;Theodoros Ntaflos;Mabrouk Sami
(2021)Vincent Perrichot;Bo Wang;Phillip Barden;Phillip Barden
(2020)W.C. Clyde;J.M. Krause;J.M. Krause;F. De Benedetti;J. Ramezani
(2021)Maria Rose Petrizzo;Brian T. Huber;Francesca Falzoni;Kenneth G. MacLeod
(2020)Elisabete Malafaia;Elisabete Malafaia;José Miguel Gasulla;Fernando Escaso;Iván Narváez
(2020)David M. Martill;Roy Smith;David M. Unwin;Alexander Kao
(2020)Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, including healthcare and environmental management. Many students consider expanding their expertise through online degrees that align with their interests and career goals. For those interested in healthcare leadership, pursuing a healthcare administration degree online offers a flexible route to advance skills in managing healthcare organizations while maintaining a focus on ecological health.
For students aiming to enter the healthcare field more directly, it's helpful to know that some easy nursing schools to get into provide accessible options without stringent entry requirements. Similarly, several nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi exams can reduce upfront testing barriers, making the path to nursing more straightforward.
Continuing education at an advanced level is also an option, as some of the cheapest online dnp program options enable students to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree affordably. These pathways often complement ecological and evolutionary studies by enhancing understanding of public health impacts from environmental changes.
In summary, integrating ecological knowledge with healthcare education via accessible online programs can provide a unique advantage in addressing complex environmental and health challenges.
