Cornea

Top Research Topics at Cornea?

Cornea mainly deals with areas of study such as Ophthalmology, Cornea, Surgery, Visual acuity and Pathology. Aside from research in Ophthalmology, it also discusses In patient studies. The Cornea study tackled is a key component of adjacent topics in the area of Keratitis.

The Keratitis research presented falls under the domain of Dermatology. Surgery research presented is mostly focused on the subject of Transplantation. In addition to Visual acuity research, the journal aims to explore topics under Astigmatism and Retrospective cohort study.

Cornea emphasizes research on Pathology, which includes concerns such as Epithelium.

• Ophthalmology (44.12%)
• Cornea (21.45%)
• Surgery (19.76%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• A Follow-up Study (1257 citations)
• Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. (799 citations)
• Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. (693 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Cornea:

The most cited publications mostly deal with topics like Ophthalmology, Surgery, Cornea, Visual acuity and Keratoconus. The journal publications aim to investigate interdisciplinary topics such as Ophthalmology and In patient. The studies on Cornea discussed at the most cited articles can also contribute to research in the domains of Confocal, Anatomy and Pathology.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

• Internal medicine
• Surgery
• Diabetes mellitus

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

The journal is mainly concerned with subjects like Ophthalmology, Visual acuity, Surgery, Descemet membrane and Cornea. Among the topics covered in the journal are Ophthalmology and In patient. Cornea connects the study in Visual acuity with the closely related area of Contact lens.

The journal concentrated on Surgery research, specifically Transplantation and Complication. In Cornea, Endothelial cell density and Biomedical engineering are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Descemet membrane research.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

• Absence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 RNA in Human Corneal Tissues. (18 citations)
• Improper Use of the Germicidal Range Ultraviolet Lamp for Household Disinfection Leading to Phototoxicity in COVID-19 Suspects. (18 citations)
• Acute Corneal Endothelial Graft Rejection With Coinciding COVID-19 Infection. (17 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Cornea (based on the number of publications) are:

• Kazuo Tsubota (119 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
• Mark J. Mannis (112 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Christopher J. Rapuano (90 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition,
• Elisabeth J. Cohen (77 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Namrata Sharma (70 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Cornea (based on the number of publications) are:

• Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (177 papers) published 15 papers at the last edition, 5 more than at the previous edition,
• All India Institute of Medical Sciences (111 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 3 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Miami (107 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 4 more than at the previous edition,
• Harvard University (105 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
• L V Prasad Eye Institute (103 papers) published 18 papers at the last edition, 10 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 15.68% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 19.87% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 10.58% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 18.59% of all publications and 50.96% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Career Prospects and Further Education for Ophthalmologists

For established researchers and practitioners in Ophthalmology and cornea studies, keeping current in the field isn't enough to maintain career momentum. Many consider furthering their education or exploring different fields to diversify their professional expertise. This decision can be influenced by several factors, including a desire for personal growth, professional advancement, or a transition in career focus. One exemplary opportunity for this growth is in the nursing sector, where quick advancements are being noticed in the last decade. Specifically, Nurse Practitioners (NPs) have emerged as a significant role in the healthcare industry by rendering crucial services in diagnostics, treatment and patient aftercare. This role encompasses responsibilities and tasks that overlap with those of ophthalmologists, making it an appealing option for those interested in expanding their career reach. In particular, if you are located in Massachusetts you may consider furthering your education by enrolling in a Nurse Practitioner program. You can consider one of the best np programs in Massachusetts to ensure a high-quality education. This venture not only enhances your knowledge and skills but also increases your marketability in an increasingly complex and interconnected medical world. In conclusion, while continuing to expand research and expertise in cornea studies and Ophthalmology, it is crucial to consider further education avenues. This consideration is especially important in a dynamic healthcare landscape where interdisciplinary skills and knowledge are becoming increasingly valuable.