| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 136 | 51 | 85 | 15 |
| Ecology and Evolution | 215 | 104 | 137 | 16 |
The scientific interests tackled in the journal are Botany, Ecology, Taxonomy (biology), Genus and Taxon. While it focused on Botany, it was also able to explore topics like Zoology and Anatomy. The Ecology works featured in Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society incorporate elements from Biological dispersal and Genetic diversity.
Most of the works presented in it deals with Taxon but it intersects with the subject of Subspecies. It is focused mainly on Pollination, particularly Pollinator.
The published articles explore disciplines such as Botany, Ecology, Genus, Taxonomy (biology) and Taxon. While Botany is the focus of the journal papers, it also provides insights into the studies of Zoology, Monophyly and Anatomy. The study on Ecology presented in the most cited publications is investigated in conjunction with research in Biological dispersal.
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society aims to foster the development of research in Botany, Evolutionary biology, Ecology, Phylogenetic tree and Orchidaceae. The Botany study featured in the journal draws parallels with the field of Ontogeny. Topics in Evolutionary biology explored in the journal were investigated in conjunction with research in Chloroplast DNA, Phylogenetics, Molecular phylogenetics, Morphology (biology) and Taxonomy (biology).
The research on Ecology tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Diversity (politics), Biological dispersal and Genetic diversity. It addresses concerns in Phylogenetic tree which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Fabaceae, Genus and Melastomataceae. While Genus is the focus of Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, it also provided insights into the studies of Rubiaceae, Monophyly and Fern.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 0.93% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 42.99% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 3.74% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 29.91% of all publications and 23.36% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Unknown
(2023)Tamara Villaverde;Tamara Villaverde;Tamara Villaverde;Pedro Jiménez-Mejías;Pedro Jiménez-Mejías;Modesto Luceño;Marcia J. Waterway
(2020)Unknown
(2022)Richard P Shefferson;Hans Jacquemyn;Tiiu Kull;Michael J Hutchings
(2020)Alexandre Antonelli;Alexandre Antonelli;Alexandre Antonelli
(2021)Zhi Fang Liu;Zhi Fang Liu;Zhi Fang Liu;Hui Ma;Xiu-Qin Ci;Xiu-Qin Ci;Lang Li;Lang Li
(2021)Vidiro Gei;Sandrine Isnard;Peter D Erskine;Guillaume Echevarria;Guillaume Echevarria
(2020)Michael Kessler;Stefan Abrahamczyk;Thorsten Krömer
(2020)Pursuing a degree in Plant Science and Agronomy in the USA opens up diverse online educational opportunities and career pathways. Many students consider advancing their expertise through complementary fields such as healthcare or environmental sciences, which often involve flexible online degree options.
For those interested in healthcare-related fields, exploring direct entry msn programs for non nurses online can be a valuable option. These programs allow learners without a nursing background to quickly enter advanced nursing practice, demonstrating how interdisciplinary knowledge enhances agronomy and plant science careers, especially in agricultural health and safety.
When comparing nursing degree options that build upon prior experience, resources like capella vs wgu rn to bsn highlight key differences in online RN to BSN programs. Such insights help professionals in related fields choose the right program for career growth, which can complement environmental and agricultural expertise.
For a specialized healthcare focus, becoming a functional medicine nurse practitioner offers a unique career avenue. Guidance on functional medicine np programs outlines the educational paths and skills needed to enter this growing niche, reflecting the increasing integration of wellness and sustainable agricultural practices.
Understanding financial outcomes is equally important. The analysis of dnp salary by state offers valuable data for prospective students assessing long-term career benefits. Such information supports strategic decisions when pursuing advanced degrees that intersect with plant science and agronomy.
