| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molecular Biology | 27 | 76 | 99 | 31 |
| Biology and Biochemistry | 57 | 349 | 374 | 53 |
Aging Cell facilitates discussions on Cell biology, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Senescence and Genetics. While the journal focused on Cell biology, it was also able to explore topics like Oxidative stress and Transcription factor. The work tackled in Aging Cell goes beyond the discipline of Oxidative stress as it also encompasses Reactive oxygen species.
Internal medicine studies presented include Skeletal muscle, Inflammation, Calorie restriction and Hormone. Presentations on Endocrinology include those discussing Insulin, Adipose tissue and Insulin resistance. Aging Cell explores topics in Senescence which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Cancer research, DNA damage, Downregulation and upregulation, Immunology and Telomere.
Genetics, which encompasses Longevity, Gene, Caenorhabditis elegans, Phenotype and Regulation of gene expression, is the main subject of Aging Cell. The in-depth study on Caenorhabditis elegans also explores topics in the intersecting field of Mutant. Research in the field of Biochemistry was used to conduct the presented Mitochondrion study.
The published papers are mainly concerned with subjects like Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Cell biology, Genetics and Longevity. The journal publications investigate Internal medicine research which frequently intersects with Signal transduction. Many of the studies tackled in the journal papers connect Cell biology with a similar field of study like Immunology.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Aging Cell (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Aging Cell (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 2.15% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 18.68% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 7.14% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 23.63% of all publications and 50.55% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Jiawei Chen;Quanlong Jiang;Xian Xia;Kangping Liu
(2020)Mikolaj Ogrodnik;Shane A. Evans;Edward Fielder;Stella Victorelli
(2021)Estela González-Gualda;Marta Pàez-Ribes;Beatriz Lozano-Torres;David Macias
(2020)Matthew J. Yousefzadeh;Matthew J. Yousefzadeh;Jing Zhao;Christina Bukata;Christina Bukata;Erin A. Wade;Erin A. Wade
(2020)Wen-Dai Bao;Xiao-Ting Zhou;Lan-Ting Zhou;Fudi Wang
(2020)Fabiola Marín-Aguilar;Ana V. Lechuga-Vieco;Elísabet Alcocer-Gómez;Beatriz Castejón-Vega
(2020)Bianca Marchetti;Cataldo Tirolo;Francesca L'Episcopo;Salvatore Caniglia
(2020)Axel Kowald;Axel Kowald;João F Passos;Thomas B L Kirkwood;Thomas B L Kirkwood
(2020)Ju‐Xian Song;Ju‐Xian Song;Sandeep Malampati;Yu Zeng;Yu Zeng;Siva Sundara Kumar Durairajan;Siva Sundara Kumar Durairajan
(2020)Studying Medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of related fields, including several promising online degree options that can complement or serve as alternatives to traditional medical careers. For example, biology majors have access to high paying jobs with a biology degree, which include roles in research, healthcare, and biotechnology. These paths offer flexibility and solid earning potential.
For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, medical billing and coding present growing career opportunities. Understanding the differences between ccs vs cpc certification is essential for choosing the right credential, as each impacts salary prospects and job responsibilities differently.
Exploring how much do medical coders make can help candidates evaluate the financial benefits of this profession. The demand for skilled medical coders remains strong due to the increasing complexity of healthcare documentation and insurance processes.
Moreover, the medical billing and coding job outlook suggests steady growth and stability, making it a viable alternative or complement to traditional medical careers.
