International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA)

The scientific conference ranking presented on this page provides a comprehensive evaluation of conferences in the field of Engineering and Technology. Developed by Research.com, a premier resource offering trusted data on scientific contributions since 2014, this ranking is part of an ongoing commitment to support academic excellence across all major domains of research, including Engineering and Technology.

The conference positions within the ranking are determined using a proprietary bibliometric score formulated by Research.com. This score is meticulously calculated based on an estimated h-index in conjunction with the number of distinguished scientists who have participated in each conference over the past three years. The resulting Impact Score values were collected on 2024-11-27, ensuring that the data reflects the most current and relevant academic developments.

The process of compiling this ranking involved a rigorous review and analysis of over 2,262 conferences, each selected through a methodical and detailed inspection. This assessment encompassed the examination of more than 26,934 scientific documents authored and presented by a cohort of 9,385 recognized and influential scientists within the Engineering and Technology community during the previous three years.

This ranking reflects the substantial expertise and sophisticated analytical methods employed, thus providing the academic community with a credible and insightful reference for assessing research venues. For a comprehensive explanation of the methodology used to compute the ranking scores, please refer to our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (based on the number of publications) are:

• Sridha Sridharan (33 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• Clinton Fookes (28 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• Simon Denman (23 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• Yongsheng Gao (22 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• Mark R. Pickering (19 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (based on the number of publications) are:

• Queensland University of Technology (60 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
• Australian National University (48 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• University of New South Wales (46 papers) published 12 papers at the last edition, 6 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Queensland (42 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (41 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 5 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2018 edition, 3.42% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 38.94% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 9.73% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 23.01% of all publications and 28.32% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.