IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM WKSHPS)

This ranking presents a comprehensive list of scientific conferences in the field of Engineering and Technology, offering a reliable reference for researchers, academics, and professionals seeking to identify leading venues for the dissemination and discussion of cutting-edge research. The ranking is curated by Research.com, a preeminent platform recognized for providing trusted data and analysis on scientific achievements and contributions across all major disciplines, including Engineering and Technology, since 2014.

The ordering of conferences in this ranking is determined by a distinctive bibliometric score developed exclusively by Research.com. This metric is meticulously calculated using a combination of the estimated h-index and the number of distinguished scientists who have contributed to each conference over the past three years. By leveraging these robust indicators, the ranking delivers an accurate and data-driven evaluation of conference impact and scientific relevance.

Impact Score values reflected in this ranking were meticulously gathered as of 2024-11-27, ensuring the currency and reliability of the presented data. The underlying assessment involved a rigorous review process that examined an extensive pool of more than 2,262 conferences. This selection was achieved through an exhaustive inspection that incorporated the analysis of over 26,934 scientific documents published in the preceding three years by a cohort of 9,385 eminent and respected scholars within Engineering and Technology.

For further and detailed information about the methodology for computing the ranking scores, including the criteria and bibliometric techniques utilized, please consult our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (based on the number of publications) are:

• Victor C. M. Leung (7 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• Yang Xiao (6 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Naixue Xiong (5 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Hong Ji (5 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
• F. Richard Yu (5 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (based on the number of publications) are:

• Tsinghua University (20 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 4 less than at the previous edition,
• Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (17 papers) published 11 papers at the last edition, 9 more than at the previous edition,
• Bell Labs (15 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• Huawei (13 papers) published 7 papers at the last edition, 4 more than at the previous edition,
• Shanghai Jiao Tong University (13 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2017 edition, 2.99% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 18.97% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 10.77% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 17.44% of all publications and 52.82% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.