World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Springer

48th edition of the International Workshop on Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science (WG)

Location: Tübingen , Germany

Submission deadline: 2/14/2022

Conference dates: 6/22/2022 - 6/24/2022

Research H-index
2

Ranking & Metrics

Discipline name Position Best Scientists Publications D-Index
Mathematics 26 2 2 2

Call for Papers

WG is mainly concerned with efficient algorithms of various types (e.g., sequential, parallel, distributed, randomized, parameterized) for problems on graphs and networks The goal is to present recent results and to identify and explore directions for future research. Submitted papers should describe original results in any aspects of graph theory related to computer science, including but not restricted to:

design and analysis of sequential, parallel, randomized, parameterized algorithms
distributed graph and network algorithms
structural graph theory with algorithmic or complexity applications
computational complexity of graph and network problems
graph grammars, graph rewriting systems and graph modeling
graph drawing and layouts
computational geometry
computational biology
graph mining
random graphs and models of the web and scale-free networks
support of the above concepts by suitable implementations and applications.

Overview

This page features a comprehensive ranking of scientific conferences in the field of Computer Science, meticulously developed by Research.com—one of the foremost authorities in science research across all major disciplines. Since 2014, Research.com has been providing trusted and reliable data on scientific contributions, earning a reputation for academic rigor and objectivity.

The current ranking utilizes a proprietary bibliometric score, uniquely crafted by Research.com, which reflects both the estimated h-index and the number of distinguished scientists who have participated in each conference over the past three years. This score serves as a robust indicator of a conference’s scientific impact and prestige within the computer science community.

Impact Score values presented here were gathered on 2024-11-27, ensuring that the evaluation remains up-to-date and relevant. The process of establishing this ranking was both systematic and exhaustive, involving the examination of over 2,742 conferences. These conferences were rigorously selected following a meticulous inspection of more than 148,739 scientific documents published within the past three years by 13,184 leading and respected scientists in the area of Computer Science. This depth of analysis exemplifies the complexity and diligence exercised by our expert team in curating this listing.

For an in-depth understanding of the methodology applied in calculating the ranking scores, we invite you to review our detailed explanation available on the Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

The top authors publishing at Workshop on Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Petr A. Golovach (7 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
  • Daniel Lokshtanov (5 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Pinar Heggernes (5 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition,
  • Pim van 't Hof (5 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition,
  • Daniël Paulusma (5 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at Workshop on Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science (based on the number of publications) are:

  • University of Bergen (18 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 5 more than at the previous edition,
  • Durham University (8 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
  • Technical University of Berlin (6 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
  • University of Cologne (5 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition,
  • University of Bordeaux (5 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2014 edition, 0.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 41.67% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 11.11% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 25.00% of all publications and 22.22% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

  • Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
  • Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
  • Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
  • Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
  • Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens doors to diverse career options, often enhanced by complementary degrees. For those interested in blending analytical skills with business acumen, pursuing the cheapest online marketing degree can offer valuable insights into market trends and data analysis, making graduates more competitive in the job market.

Additionally, professionals aiming to accelerate their managerial prospects might consider a 1 year MBA. This efficient program equips students with essential leadership and financial skills, complementing quantitative expertise from a mathematics background.

For those drawn toward organizational development and employee relations, the best online masters degree in human resource management programs provide strategic HR knowledge that can synergize well with analytical problem-solving abilities.

Lastly, students interested in healthcare analytics or nursing leadership may explore the cheapest ADN online programs. These affordable nursing pathways paired with mathematical skills prepare candidates for critical roles in data-driven healthcare environments.

Best Scientists who published in this Conference