12th EETN Conference on Artificial Intelligence (SETN)

This ranking provides a comprehensive evaluation of scientific conferences in the field of Computer Science, offering reliable insights for researchers, academics, and professionals. Developed by Research.com—a leading authority in science research analytics across all major fields—this ranking benefits from Research.com’s longstanding commitment to delivering trusted data on scientific contributions since 2014.

Conference positions in this ranking are determined by a unique bibliometric score, meticulously designed and implemented by Research.com. This score reflects both the estimated h-index and the number of distinguished scientists who have participated in each conference within the past three years. The Impact Score values included herein were gathered on 2024-11-27, ensuring the latest and most accurate representation of scientific impact and engagement.

The ranking process involved a rigorous and multi-stage evaluation. More than 2,742 Computer Science conferences were carefully analyzed and ultimately included in the ranking, following a thorough appraisal and critical examination of over 148,739 scientific documents published over the previous three years. Contributions from a cohort of 13,184 leading and highly respected scientists in the area of Computer Science were considered, underscoring the depth and precision of this analytical undertaking.

To learn more about the detailed methodology and bibliometric techniques employed in compiling this ranking, please visit our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence (based on the number of publications) are:

• Ioannis Vlahavas (9 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• Anastasios Tefas (8 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
• Iosif Mporas (6 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• Dimitris Kalles (6 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• Nikos Fakotakis (6 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence (based on the number of publications) are:

• Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (24 papers) published 11 papers at the last edition, 5 more than at the previous edition,
• University of the Aegean (24 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• University of Patras (18 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• University of Ioannina (14 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
• National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (12 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2016 edition, 5.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 76.32% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 0.00% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 18.42% of all publications and 5.26% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.