World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 32 2633 2485 1033 954 103 5765

Xiumin Martin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Xiumin Martin between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Xiumin Martin published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2021. 8 of the 109 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2021. 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 5 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 1 publication
2005 2025

109 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Xiumin Martin: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 2
2006 4
2007 6
2008 8
2009 5
2010 5
2011 6
2012 2
2013 5
2014 7
2015 6
2016 2
2017 6
2018 1
2019 5
2020 6
2021 11
2022 6
2023 8
2024 7
2025 1
Total 109
Download as CSV

Xiumin Martin publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiumin Martin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 100–104 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 103 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104 103
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Xiumin Martin D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiumin Martin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171 32
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Manager sentiment and stock returns

    Fuwei Jiang;Joshua Lee;Xiumin Martin;Guofu Zhou

  • Executive Compensation and the Maturity Structure of Corporate Debt

    Paul Brockman;Xiumin Martin;Emre Unlu

  • Acquisition profitability and timely loss recognition

    Jere R. Francis;Xiumin Martin

  • Financial Development and the Cash Flow Sensitivity of Cash

    Inder K. Khurana;Xiumin Martin;Raynolde Pereira

  • Does Voluntary Disclosure Improve Stock Price Informativeness

    K. Stephen Haggard;Xiumin Martin;Raynolde Pereira

  • Voluntary disclosures around share repurchases

    Paul Brockman;Inder K. Khurana;Xiumin Martin

  • Firm Growth and Disclosure: An Empirical Analysis

    Inder K. Khurana;Raynolde Pereira;Xiumin Martin

  • On the fast track: Information acquisition costs and information production

    Deqiu Chen;Yujing Ma;Xiumin Martin;Roni Michaely

  • The Role of Firm-Specific Incentives and Country Factors in Explaining Voluntary IAS Adoptions: Evidence from Private Firms

    Jere R. Francis;Inder K. Khurana;Xiumin Martin;Raynolde Pereira

  • Do financial market developments influence accounting practices? Credit default swaps and borrowers׳ reporting conservatism

    Xiumin Martin;Sugata Roychowdhury

  • Insider Trading, Litigation Concerns, and Auditor Going-Concern Opinions

    Chen Chen;Xiumin Martin;Xin Wang

  • Accounting Conservatism and Creditor Recovery Rate

    John Donovan;Richard M. Frankel;Xiumin Martin

  • Target Firm-Specific Information and Acquisition Efficiency

    Xiumin Martin;Ron Shalev

  • Issues raised by studying DeFond and Zhang: : What should audit researchers do?

    John Donovan;Richard Frankel;Joshua Lee;Xiumin Martin

  • The Relative Importance of Firm Incentives versus Country Factors in the Demand for Assurance Services by Private Entities

    Jere R. Francis;Inder K. Khurana;Xiumin Martin;Raynolde Pereira

  • Acquisition Profitability and Timely Loss Recognition

    Jere R. Francis;Xiumin Martin

  • Clarity begins at home: Internal information asymmetry and external communication quality

    Chen Chen;Xiumin Martin;Sugata Roychowdhury;Xin Wang

  • Accounting Quality and Trade Credit

    Deqiu Chen;Ming Liu;Tao Ma;Xiumin Martin

  • Financial Development and the Cash Flow Sensitivity of Cash

    Inder K. Khurana;Xiumin Martin;Raynolde Pereira

  • Panacea, Pandora’s Box, or Placebo: Feedback in Bank Mortgage-Backed Security Holdings and Fair Value Accounting

    Gauri Bhat;Richard M. Frankel;Xiumin Martin

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard M. Frankel
Richard M. Frankel Washington University in St. Louis
Inder K. Khurana
Inder K. Khurana University of Missouri
Paul Brockman
Paul Brockman Lehigh University
Roni Michaely
Roni Michaely University of Hong Kong
Jere R. Francis
Jere R. Francis Maastricht University
Guofu Zhou
Guofu Zhou Washington University in St. Louis
Ran Duchin
Ran Duchin University of Washington
Robert M. Bushman
Robert M. Bushman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Anjan V. Thakor
Anjan V. Thakor Washington University in St. Louis
Stephen G. Ryan
Stephen G. Ryan New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Xiumin Martin