World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 56 11622 10467 3136 2564 189 11132

Xianzhi Meng publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Xianzhi Meng between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Xianzhi Meng published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 11.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2022. 53 of the 267 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2022. 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 46 publications 2023: 38 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 28 publications
2003 2025

267 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Xianzhi Meng: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 3
2004 2
2005 0
2006 3
2007 3
2008 1
2009 3
2010 1
2011 0
2012 2
2013 4
2014 5
2015 8
2016 6
2017 11
2018 14
2019 13
2020 25
2021 26
2022 46
2023 38
2024 25
2025 28
Total 267
Download as CSV

Xianzhi Meng publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xianzhi Meng sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 189 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344 189
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Xianzhi Meng D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xianzhi Meng sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051 56
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • The critical role of lignin in lignocellulosic biomass conversion and recent pretreatment strategies: A comprehensive review.

    Chang Geun Yoo;Xianzhi Meng;Yunqiao Pu;Arthur J. Ragauskas

  • Miscanthus: a fast-growing crop for biofuels and chemicals production

    Nicolas Brosse;Anthony Dufour;Xianzhi Meng;Qining Sun

  • Recent advances in understanding the role of cellulose accessibility in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates.

    Xianzhi Meng;Arthur Jonas Ragauskas

  • Determination of hydroxyl groups in biorefinery resources via quantitative 31P NMR spectroscopy

    Xianzhi Meng;Claudia Crestini;Haoxi Ben;Naijia Hao

  • Lignin-enzyme interaction: A roadblock for efficient enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics

    Caoxing Huang;Xiao Jiang;Xiaojun Shen;Jinguang Hu

  • Recent advances in understanding the pseudo-lignin formation in a lignocellulosic biorefinery

    Somnath D. Shinde;Xianzhi Meng;Rajeev Kumar;Rajeev Kumar;Arthur J. Ragauskas

  • The effect of alkaline pretreatment methods on cellulose structure and accessibility.

    Garima Bali;Xianzhi Meng;Jacob I. Deneff;Qining Sun

  • Effective biomass fractionation and lignin stabilization using a diol DES system

    Unknown

  • Insights into the effect of dilute acid, hot water or alkaline pretreatment on the cellulose accessible surface area and the overall porosity of Populus

    Xianzhi Meng;Tyrone Wells;Qining Sun;Fang Huang

  • Effects of organosolv and ammonia pretreatments on lignin properties and its inhibition for enzymatic hydrolysis

    Chang Geun Yoo;Mi Li;Xianzhi Meng;Yunqiao Pu

  • Effect of lignin content on changes occurring in poplar cellulose ultrastructure during dilute acid pretreatment

    Qining Sun;Marcus Foston;Xianzhi Meng;Daisuke Sawada

  • Diol pretreatment to fractionate a reactive lignin in lignocellulosic biomass biorefineries

    Chengyu Dong;Xianzhi Meng;Chi Shun Yeung;Ho Yin Tse

  • Determination of porosity of lignocellulosic biomass before and after pretreatment by using Simons' stain and NMR techniques.

    Xianzhi Meng;Marcus Foston;Johannes Leisen;Jaclyn DeMartini

  • An In-Depth Understanding of Biomass Recalcitrance Using Natural Poplar Variants as the Feedstock.

    Xianzhi Meng;Yunqiao Pu;Chang Geun Yoo;Mi Li

  • Investigation of a Lignin-Based Deep Eutectic Solvent Using p-Hydroxybenzoic Acid for Efficient Woody Biomass Conversion

    Yunxuan Wang;Xianzhi Meng;Keunhong Jeong;Shuya Li

  • The effect of liquid hot water pretreatment on the chemical–structural alteration and the reduced recalcitrance in poplar

    Mi Li;Shilin Cao;Shilin Cao;Xianzhi Meng;Michael Hans-Peter Studer;Michael Hans-Peter Studer;Michael Hans-Peter Studer

  • Synthesis, Characterization, and Utilization of a Lignin-Based Adsorbent for Effective Removal of Azo Dye from Aqueous Solution

    Xianzhi Meng;Brent Scheidemantle;Mi Li;Yun-yan Wang

  • NMR a critical tool to study the production of carbon fiber from lignin

    Marcus Foston;Grady A. Nunnery;Xianzhi Meng;Qining Sun

  • Chemical Transformations of Poplar Lignin during Cosolvent Enhanced Lignocellulosic Fractionation Process

    Xianzhi Meng;Aakash Parikh;Bhogeswararao Seemala;Rajeev Kumar

Frequent Co-Authors

Zhonghuai Xiang
Zhonghuai Xiang Southwest University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to a variety of professional paths. For those interested in healthcare and pharmaceuticals, understanding how to get into pharmaceutical sales can be a valuable step. This path combines scientific knowledge with communication skills to effectively promote medical products.

If you’re drawn to direct patient care and medication management, exploring how do you become a pharmacist offers insights into the education and licensing requirements needed to enter this respected profession.

Chemistry graduates can also pursue roles in forensic science, an exciting field that merges investigative work with scientific analysis. Learning about online forensic science courses provides flexible options for specialized education in this area.

For those interested in the medical examiner’s office, discovering more about autopsy tech careers outlines the skills and training needed to support forensic pathology through technical expertise.

Each of these pathways highlights the diverse opportunities available to Chemistry graduates, emphasizing the importance of targeted education and professional development in achieving career success.

Best Scientists Citing Xianzhi Meng

Recently Published Articles