World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Will Featherstone

Will Featherstone

Will Featherstone publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Will Featherstone sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Will Featherstone D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Will Featherstone sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Will Featherstone is affiliated with Curtin University in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences and Engineering, with significant contributions to subfields including Aerospace Engineering, Oceanography, Atmospheric Science, Ocean Engineering, and Environmental Engineering.

The scientist's work covers various main topics, with notable emphasis on:

  • Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
  • Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
  • GNSS positioning and interference
  • Historical Geography and Cartography
  • Statistical and numerical algorithms
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry

Frequent publication venues for Will Featherstone include:

  • Survey Review
  • Journal of Surveying Engineering
  • Terrestrial Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences
  • Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Remote Sensing

Their recent published papers are as follows:

  • Disruptive influences of residual noise, network configuration and data gaps on InSAR-derived land motion rates using the SBAS technique, 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Applications of Satellite Radar Imagery for Hazard Monitoring: Insights from Australia, 2021, Remote Sensing
  • New gravimetric-only and hybrid geoid models of Taiwan for height modernisation, cross-island datum connection and airborne LiDAR mapping, 2020, Journal of Geodesy
  • Empirical comparison between stochastic and deterministic modifiers over the French Auvergne geoid computation test-bed, 2021, Survey Review
  • Land uplift linked to managed aquifer recharge in the Perth Basin, Australia, 2021, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

Will Featherstone has collaborated frequently with other researchers, including:

  • Ropesh Goyal
  • Onkar Dikshit
  • M. S. Filmer
  • Amy Parker
  • Nagarajan Balasubramanian

Best Publications

  • Comparison and validation of recent freely-available ASTER-GDEM ver1, SRTM ver4.1 and GEODATA DEM-9S ver3 digital elevation models over Australia

    Christian Hirt;Michael Filmer;Will Featherstone

  • A unified approach to the Clenshaw summation and the recursive computation of very high degree and order normalised associated Legendre functions

    S. A. Holmes;W. E. Featherstone

  • Geodetic determination of tectonic deformation in central Greece from 1900 to 1988

    H. Billiris;D. Paradissis;G. Veis;P. England

  • A coastal retracking system for satellite radar altimeter waveforms: Application to ERS‐2 around Australia

    X. Deng;Will Featherstone

  • Geodetic versus geophysical perspectives of the ‘gravity anomaly’

    R. I. Hackney;W. E. Featherstone

  • The AUSGeoid98 geoid model of Australia: data treatment, computations and comparisons with GPS-levelling data

    W.E. Featherstone;J.F. Kirby;A.H.W. Kearsley;J.R. Gilliland

  • STRATEGIES FOR THE ACCURATE DETERMINATION OF ORTHOMETRIC HEIGHTS FROM GPS

    W.E. Featherstone;Mike Dentith;J.F. Kirby

  • Estimation of Contamination of ERS-2 and POSEIDON Satellite Radar Altimetry Close to the Coasts of Australia

    X. Deng;W. E. Featherstone;Chein-way Hwang;P. A.M. Berry

  • Predicting sea level variations with artificial neural networks at Hillarys Boat Harbour, Western Australia

    Oleg Makarynskyy;D. Makarynska;Michael Kuhn;Will Featherstone

  • Determination of the Boundary Values for the Stokes-Helmert Problem

    P. Vaníček;J. Huang;P. Novák;S. Pagiatakis

  • Combining EGM2008 and SRTM/DTM2006.0 residual terrain model data to improve quasigeoid computations in mountainous areas devoid of gravity data

    Christian Hirt;Will Featherstone;U. Marti

  • Evaluation of the first GOCE static gravity field models using terrestrial gravity, vertical deflections and EGM2008 quasigeoid heights

    Christian Hirt;T. Gruber;Will Featherstone

  • GRACE‐derived ice‐mass variations over Greenland by accounting for leakage effects

    O. Baur;Michael Kuhn;Will Featherstone

  • A Meissl-modified Vaníček and Kleusberg kernel to reduce the truncation error in gravimetric geoid computations

    W. E. Featherstone;J. D. Evans;J. G. Olliver

  • Performance of three types of Stokes's kernel in the combined solution for the geoid

    P. Vanicek;Will Featherstone

  • A geodetic approach to gravity data reduction for geophysics

    W. E. Featherstone;M. C. Dentith

  • New views of the spherical Bouguer gravity anomaly

    P. Vanicek;R. Tenzer;Lars Erik Sjöberg;Z. Martinec

  • Height systems and vertical datums: A review in the Australian context

    Will Featherstone;Michael Kuhn

  • The rigorous determination of orthometric heights

    R. Tenzer;R. Tenzer;P. Vanicek;M. Santos;Will Featherstone

  • Closed-Form transformation between geodetic and ellipsoidal coordinates

    Will Featherstone;Sten Claessens

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Kuhn
Michael Kuhn Curtin University
Christian Hirt
Christian Hirt Technical University of Munich
Joseph L. Awange
Joseph L. Awange Curtin University
Petr Vaníček
Petr Vaníček University of New Brunswick
Shin-Chan Han
Shin-Chan Han The Ohio State University
Chris W. Hughes
Chris W. Hughes University of Liverpool
Cheinway Hwang
Cheinway Hwang National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Robert Tenzer
Robert Tenzer Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Richard Coleman
Richard Coleman University of Tasmania
Paul Tregoning
Paul Tregoning Australian National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens diverse pathways that extend beyond traditional geology roles. Many students explore related fields to enhance their career prospects, blending scientific expertise with practical skills. For instance, pursuing an online Spanish degree can be valuable for Earth Science professionals working in international environmental policy or global resource management, where bilingual communication is essential.

Veterans interested in transitioning to civilian roles often find that an online Spanish degrees for veterans offer flexibility and tailored support, complementing their Earth Science background with language skills that improve outreach and community engagement.

Additionally, creative approaches like earning a master of fine arts online can enrich careers by fostering new ways to visualize and communicate scientific concepts, making technical information more accessible and captivating to broader audiences.

Furthermore, those aiming for leadership roles may consider the best online master degree in human resource management to develop skills in team management and organizational development, which are highly relevant in managing scientific projects and environmental consultancy firms.

Best Scientists Citing Will Featherstone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles