World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
34
Citations
3254
World Ranking
2943
National Ranking
36

V. Mantic publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where V. Mantic sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 207 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

V. Mantic D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where V. Mantic sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Interface crack onset at a circular cylindrical inclusion under a remote transverse tension. Application of a coupled stress and energy criterion

    Unknown

  • Kinking of Transversal Interface Cracks Between Fiber and Matrix

    Unknown

  • A new formula for the C-matrix in the Somigliana identity

    Unknown

  • Finite Fracture Mechanics at elastic interfaces

    Pietro Cornetti;V. Mantic;Alberto Carpinteri

  • BEM analysis of crack onset and propagation along fiber–matrix interface under transverse tension using a linear elastic–brittle interface model

    Unknown

  • Fiber-size effects on the onset of fiber–matrix debonding under transverse tension: A comparison between cohesive zone and finite fracture mechanics models

    Israel Garcia;Marco Paggi;Vladislav Mantic

  • Weak formulation of axi-symmetric frictionless contact problems with boundary elements

    Unknown

  • A linear elastic-brittle interface model: application for the onset and propagation of a fibre-matrix interface crack under biaxial transverse loads

    Unknown

  • A micromechanical view of inter-fibre failure of composite materials under compression transverse to the fibres

    Unknown

  • A numerical study of transverse cracking in cross-ply laminates by 3D finite fracture mechanics

    I.G. García;B.J. Carter;A.R. Ingraffea;V. Mantič

  • Relation between SIF and ERR based measures of fracture mode mixity in interface cracks

    Unknown

  • On Invertibility of Elastic Single-Layer Potential Operator

    Unknown

  • Crack onset and growth at the fibre–matrix interface under a remote biaxial transverse load. Application of a coupled stress and energy criterion

    Unknown

  • Numerical characterisation of the fibre–matrix interface crack growth in composites under transverse compression

    Unknown

  • BEM solution of two-dimensional contact problems by weak application of contact conditions with non-conforming discretizations

    Unknown

  • Mode-I debonding of a double cantilever beam: A comparison between cohesive crack modeling and Finite Fracture Mechanics

    R. Dimitri;P. Cornetti;V. Mantič;M. Trullo

  • On solvability of a boundary integral equation of the first kind for Dirichlet boundary value problems in plane elasticity

    Unknown

  • Debonding at the fibre–matrix interface under remote transverse tension. One debond or two symmetric debonds?

    Unknown

  • Fundamental solutions for steady-state heat transfer in an exponentially graded anisotropic material

    J. R. Berger;P. A. Martin;V. Mantič;L. J. Gray

  • Analysis of a Crack in a Thin Adhesive Layer between Orthotropic Materials: An Application to Composite Interlaminar Fracture Toughness Test

    Unknown

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in branching out from Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, several related fields offer promising career opportunities. For example, programs like an accelerated bcba program provide a fast-track route into behavior analysis, a sector with growing demand.

When considering further education, it’s important to evaluate application strategies wisely. If you're exploring fields such as speech-language pathology, knowing how many slp grad schools should i apply to can help maximize your chances of acceptance without overwhelming yourself.

Moreover, finding accessible programs is crucial. Some students might prefer to explore easiest speech pathology programs to get into, which can offer more approachable admission requirements while still providing quality education.

Finally, financial planning plays a key role. Understanding the costs associated with online degrees is essential, as highlighted by details on online speech pathology degree tuition. Being aware of tuition and fees enables better budgeting and helps avoid surprises.