World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
32
Citations
4311
World Ranking
3194
National Ranking
60

Uriel G. Rothblum publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Uriel G. Rothblum sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 178 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Uriel G. Rothblum D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Uriel G. Rothblum sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Uriel G. Rothblum was affiliated with the Technion - Israel Institute of Technology in Israel.

Throughout their career, Rothblum contributed to academic research without an available record of frequently collaborating co-authors or specific recent papers. The absence of listed publication venues and book publishers implies limited accessible bibliographic metadata.

No detailed data on main fields of study, subfields, or research topics has been recorded for Rothblum. Similarly, there is no available information on awards received during their academic tenure.

The profile of Rothblum is therefore based mainly on institutional association and acknowledges the historical context, recognizing that they are deceased.

Best Publications

  • Nonnegative ranks, decompositions, and factorizations of nonnegative matrices

    Joel E. Cohen;Uriel G. Rothblum;Uriel G. Rothblum

  • Stable Matchings, Optimal Assignments, and Linear Programming

    Alvin E. Roth;Uriel G. Rothblum;John H. Vande Vate

  • Characterization of stable matchings as extreme points of a polytope

    Uriel G. Rothblum;Uriel G. Rothblum

  • Nature plays with dice : terrorists do not: Allocating resources to counter strategic versus probabilistic risks

    Boaz Golany;Edward H. Kaplan;Abraham Marmur;Uriel G. Rothblum

  • Algebraic eigenspaces of nonnegative matrices

    Unknown

  • Technical Note—A Partitioning Problem with Additive Objective with an Application to Optimal Inventory Groupings for Joint Replenishment

    A. K. Chakravarty;J. B. Orlin;U. G. Rothblum

  • Consecutive Optimizers for a Partitioning Problem with Applications to Optimal Inventory Groupings for Joint Replenishment

    A. K. Chakravarty;J. B. Orlin;U. G. Rothblum

  • Accuracy Certificates for Computational Problems with Convex Structure

    Arkadi Nemirovski;Shmuel Onn;Uriel G. Rothblum

  • Optimal partitions having disjoint convex and conic hulls

    E. R. Barnes;A. J. Hoffman;Uriel G. Rothblum

  • A Polynomial Time Algorithm for Shaped Partition Problems

    Frank K. Hwang;Shmuel Onn;Uriel G. Rothblum

  • Scalings of matrices which have prespecified row sums and column sums via optimization

    Uriel G. Rothblum;Hans Schneider

  • Upper bounds on the maximum modulus of subdominant eigenvalues of nonnegative matrices

    Unknown

  • Line-sum-symmetric scalings of square nonnegative matrices

    B. Curtis Eaves;Alan J. Hoffman;Uriel G. Rothblum;Hans Schneider

  • Approximations to Solutions to Systems of Linear Inequalities

    Osman Guler;Alan J. Hoffman;Uriel G. Rothblum

  • An upper bound for the minimum rank of a graph

    Avi Berman;Shmuel Friedland;Leslie Hogben;Leslie Hogben;Uriel G. Rothblum

  • On the single resource capacity problem for multi-item inventory systems

    Meir J. Rosenblatt;Uriel G. Rothblum

  • Multiplicative Markov Decision Chains

    Unknown

  • Stable matchings and linear inequalities

    Hernán G. Abeledo;Uriel G. Rothblum;Uriel G. Rothblum

  • Growth Optimality for Branching Markov Decision Chains

    Unknown

  • A note on the computation of the CP-rank

    Abraham Berman;Uriel G. Rothblum

  • On complexity of matrix scaling

    Arkadi Nemirovski;Uriel Rothblum

  • Scaling Matrices to Prescribed Row and Column Maxima

    Uriel G. Rothblum;Hans Schneider;Michael H. Schneider

  • Convex integer maximization via Graver bases

    J.A. De Loera;R. Hemmecke;S. Onn;U.G. Rothblum

  • Inducing coordination in supply chains through linear reward schemes

    Boaz Golany;Uriel G. Rothblum

  • Partition-Optimization with Schur Convex Sum Objective Functions

    Frank K. Hwang;Uriel G. Rothblum

  • Two-sided matching: A study in game-theoretic modeling and analysis

    Uriel G Rothblum

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank K. Hwang
Frank K. Hwang National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Hans Schneider
Hans Schneider University of Wisconsin–Madison
Alan J. Hoffman
Alan J. Hoffman IBM (United States)
Joel E. Cohen
Joel E. Cohen Rockefeller University
Meir J. Rosenblatt
Meir J. Rosenblatt Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Stavros A. Zenios
Stavros A. Zenios University of Cyprus
Don Coppersmith
Don Coppersmith IBM (United States)
Ya'acov Ritov
Ya'acov Ritov University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Mathematics, expanding your skillset through related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. A popular choice is pursuing a data analytics masters programs, which combines mathematical theory with practical data interpretation skills highly sought after in industries like finance, healthcare, and technology.

Those looking to strengthen their business acumen alongside quantitative skills might explore the easiest mba program to get into. These programs offer a smooth transition for students from technical backgrounds into leadership roles.

Additionally, many professionals opt for an easy online mba to balance learning with work commitments. These programs provide flexibility while delivering critical knowledge in management, useful for mathematical scientists aiming to lead projects or departments.

For those seeking advanced executive education, exploring online dba programs can be a strategic move. A Doctorate in Business Administration enhances research and leadership skills, enabling mathematicians to influence policy and strategic decisions in business contexts.

Best Scientists Citing Uriel G. Rothblum