World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 62 8689 2491 156 20365

Stanley L. Miller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stanley L. Miller between 1952 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stanley L. Miller published across 74 years, from 1952 to 2025, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 1996. 1 of the 174 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1952 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 1996. 1952: 1 publication 1953: 2 publications 1954: 0 publications 1955: 1 publication 1956: 0 publications 1957: 2 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 2 publications 1960: 3 publications 1961: 2 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 1 publication 1964: 2 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 3 publications 1969: 10 publications 1970: 6 publications 1971: 6 publications 1972: 7 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 5 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 5 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 9 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 14 publications 1996: 16 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1952 2025

174 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stanley L. Miller: publications per year, 1952 to 2025
Year Publications
1952 1
1953 2
1954 0
1955 1
1956 0
1957 2
1958 0
1959 2
1960 3
1961 2
1962 0
1963 1
1964 2
1965 0
1966 0
1967 1
1968 3
1969 10
1970 6
1971 6
1972 7
1973 2
1974 5
1975 0
1976 2
1977 2
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 2
1982 1
1983 5
1984 4
1985 2
1986 9
1987 6
1988 1
1989 4
1990 3
1991 5
1992 0
1993 4
1994 5
1995 14
1996 16
1997 3
1998 5
1999 5
2000 3
2001 3
2002 3
2003 1
2004 2
2005 1
2006 1
2007 2
2008 1
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 1
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 174
Download as CSV

Stanley L. Miller publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley L. Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 156 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218 156
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Stanley L. Miller D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley L. Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834 62
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1973 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences

Overview

Stanley L. Miller was affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their academic work was concentrated primarily in the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, as well as Epidemiology.

Their published research covered several topics, including:

  • Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Neonatal and Maternal Infections

Among the documented publications, one recent paper appeared in 2025:

  • "Navigating a stealthy invader: Insights from two different Streptococcus intermedius cases," published in the Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care

This paper was co-authored with E. Anders, a frequent collaborator. The Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care was also the primary publication venue for their work.

Stanley L. Miller's contributions to medicine were recognized with the award of Member of the National Academy of Sciences in 1973.

Best Publications

  • A Production of Amino Acids Under Possible Primitive Earth Conditions

    Stanley L. Miller

  • Organic Compound Synthesis on the Primitive Earth

    Stanley L. Miller;Harold C. Urey

  • Production of Some Organic Compounds under Possible Primitive Earth Conditions1

    Stanley L. Miller

  • The case for an ancestral genetic system involving simple analogues of the nucleotides.

    Gerald F. Joyce;Alan W. Schwartz;Stanley L. Miller;Leslie E. Orgel

  • The Origins of Life on the Earth

    Stanley L. Miller;Leslie E. Orgel

  • The origin and early evolution of life: prebiotic chemistry, the pre-RNA world, and time.

    Antonio Lazcano;Stanley L Miller

  • Rates of decomposition of ribose and other sugars: implications for chemical evolution

    Rosa Larralde;Michael P. Robertson;Stanley L. Miller

  • The stability of the RNA bases: implications for the origin of life.

    Matthew Levy;Stanley L. Miller

  • A reassessment of prebiotic organic synthesis in neutral planetary atmospheres.

    H. James Cleaves;John H. Chalmers;Antonio Lazcano;Stanley L. Miller

  • Peptide nucleic acids rather than RNA may have been the first genetic molecule

    Kevin E. Nelson;Matthew Levy;Stanley L. Miller

  • Reasons for the occurrence of the twenty coded protein amino acids

    Arthur L. Weber;Stanley L. Miller

  • Prebiotic synthesis in atmospheres containing CH4, CO, and CO2. I. Amino acids.

    Gordon Schlesinger;Stanley L. Miller

  • An efficient prebiotic synthesis of cytosine and uracil

    Michael P. Robertson;Stanley L. Miller

  • The chemical conditions on the parent body of the Murchison meteorite: some conclusions based on amino, hydroxy and dicarboxylic acids.

    E.T. Peltzer;J.L. Bada;G. Schlesinger;S.L. Miller

  • Energy yields for hydrogen cyanide and formaldehyde syntheses: the HCN and amino acid concentrations in the primitive ocean.

    Roscoe Stribling;Stanley L. Miller

  • Negative Pressure in the Interstitial Fluid of Animals

    P. F. Scholander;Alan R. Hargens;Stanley L. Miller

  • Carbon Dioxide Clathrate in the Martian Ice Cap

    Stanley L. Miller;William D. Smythe

  • Nonprotein amino acids from spark discharges and their comparison with the murchison meteorite amino acids.

    Yecheskel Wolman;William J. Haverland;Stanley L. Miller

  • The Cold Origin of Life: A. Implications Based On The Hydrolytic Stabilities Of Hydrogen Cyanide And Formamide

    Shin Miyakawa;H. James Cleaves;Stanley L. Miller

  • Prebiotic synthesis of hydrophobic and protein amino acids.

    David Ring;Yecheskel Wolman;Nadav Friedmann;Stanley L. Miller

  • The cold origin of life: B. Implications based on pyrimidines and purines produced from frozen ammonium cyanide solutions.

    Shin Miyakawa;H. James Cleaves;Stanley L. Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey L. Bada
Jeffrey L. Bada University of California, San Diego
Leslie E. Orgel
Leslie E. Orgel Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Harold C. Urey
Harold C. Urey University of California, San Diego
Gerald F. Joyce
Gerald F. Joyce Salk Institute for Biological Studies
William J. Borucki
William J. Borucki Ames Research Center
Jason P. Dworkin
Jason P. Dworkin Goddard Space Flight Center
Christopher P. McKay
Christopher P. McKay Ames Research Center
James F. Kasting
James F. Kasting Pennsylvania State University
Christopher H. House
Christopher H. House Pennsylvania State University
Edmond I. Eger
Edmond I. Eger University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Chemistry degree opens doors to a variety of specialized fields, including forensic science and forensic psychology. Many students are turning to flexible programs such as forensic science online degree options to combine their interest in chemistry with crime scene investigation techniques.

For those interested in the behavioral aspects of forensics, forensic psychology master's programs offer a valuable pathway. These programs explore the psychological factors behind criminal behavior, often building on a scientific foundation in chemistry and biology.

When considering such career paths, understanding potential earnings is crucial. The forensic scientist salary varies based on experience, location, and specialization, yet remains competitive among science-related professions.

Cost is another important factor for prospective students. Researching affordable education options, like those detailed in cost of criminal justice degree articles, helps in planning for tuition, fees, and other expenses associated with online and on-campus programs.

Best Scientists Citing Stanley L. Miller

Recently Published Articles